Guest guest Posted July 17, 2005 Report Share Posted July 17, 2005 > It is certainly clear after all these years that any energy devoted to this topic on my part is > quite futile. Professions that continually infight about structural matters long settled > worldwide in every other technical field are likely doomed to obsolescence. That is road > down which we are heading with this and any number of other debates on this list that > seem to begin with the relativistic premise that any approach is as good as any other. Ah, the hippy days of TCM. As you know from Ken Wilber's work and Spiral Dynamic theory it's not about how hard or well or logically you form your points, it ultimately comes down to the level of consciousness of the person that receives it. If they are at at the " green meme " , anything that you say about one way being better than another is automatically interpreted as being nastily hierarchical and marginalising, even if it is actually more encompassing of how reality actually is. It isn't about spelling out your arguments clearer necessarily (though it is important that you continue to do so), it is about getting more people to evolve their consciousness so that they can even see where you are coming from. Don't know how to do that over an internet forum... perhaps you could start a www.integralnaked.org style website with mp3 interviews downloaded with major player in TCM talking about their points of view? -Li Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.