Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 I, too, would be interested in knowing where these conclusions came from. About a year ago, I posted a request on this list for any references to controlled clinical research that compared the results of allopathic-style use of Chinese herbal formulas to individually tailored formulas based on the bian-zheng patterns. No one could give me any references at that time. If such conclusions came from Chinese research, I would want to examine the experimental design, as most Chinese research is very poorly done and allows a high degree of subjectivity to creep in. Roger > " " >RE: Re: learning styles and self-study > >> >> >> On Behalf Of >> 2. research shows both allopathic and standardized formulas for patterns >> to work at least >> as well as completely individualized ones. There is evidence to support >> all three methods >> as equally effective. > >Can you back this up? I cannot think of that many studies that have >compared all three... hhmm IBS study... well the individualized style won >(long-term)... I want to hear more before I except such generalized >statements... > >And should your word 'patterns' be 'diseases'? > >- > ---Roger Wicke, PhD, TCM Clinical Herbalist contact: www.rmhiherbal.org/contact/ Rocky Mountain Herbal Institute, Hot Springs, Montana USA Clinical herbology training programs - www.rmhiherbal.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.