Guest guest Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 > > > On Behalf Of > Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:02 PM > > Re: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > > But if you are saying that Chinese used the > concept of vibration is some real theapetic way, then this is useful, but > should be explained. If you say is rooted in energy > vortices, then fine. But Vibration Orr energy vortice must be defined and > then showed how the Chinese actually used this concept. > >>>> > Jason > the only thing i can think of is sound used in qi gong therapies Yes I have heard this goes back quite far, but I get the impression that is not what Mike et al are talking about, or are they? -Jason > > > > Oakland, CA 94609 > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 , " " <@c...> wrote: > > I always find it convenient that when some idea that is not documented > anywhere is claimed to come from an oral tradition, or whatever. I don't > discount oral traditions, but am skeptical of concepts or usages that not > only sound odd, but are just not found anywhere else. But that is just me. I am with you, brother. Glad to see someone holding the mantle. fight the good fight. its all that remains to prevent the total degeneration of the actual tradition. We can't just discount oral traditions, but consider carefully whether the ancient chinese could have actually conceived an idea. As I understand it, concepts like energy and vortices are derived from modern physics and were completely unknown in any fashion to the ancients. ideas that sound similar must then be the product of modern minds looking backwards and extrapolating, rather than a true discovery of what the ancients thought (this applies to most of the mystical and jungian BS, as well). I would go even further and say that unless you at least read chinese and have read extensively, you may be a good herbalist, but you (like me) have no clue what was really on the minds of these ancient docs. That is why I always deferred to scholars and consensus in my teaching and practice. And to go even further, it may be unethical to practice even valid but idiosyncratic traditions when effective but perhaps more mundane approaches are much better documented. There will be a time when violating a reasonable standard of care in TCM will have legal ramifications. So don't be gulled by the arcane and unusual and if so, know that you do so at the peril of yourself and your patients. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 > > > On Behalf Of mike Bowser > Friday, September 30, 2005 6:29 AM > > Re: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > > Sound, color, even food all have frequency and have been associated with > the > Chinese five phases. This particular set of theories, I think, is more > closely related to physics due to these interconnections. > > On the treatment side you have the various cycles and even needle and moxa > usage. Yes, these have frequencies as well. The Infra-red given off by > moxa has been used in many types of therapies from IR saunas to healthcare > devices. I think we should have a more open mind about how things work in > this universe and not remain so conservative in thought. Mike, Just to let you know, I and probably most people on here, are from conservative. Trust me I am open to any method of healing that can get people better. I am open to integrating modern ideas of physics, western medicine, homeopathic medicine into our healing. But this is a big difference than saying the Chinese have been using these ideas for 2000 years. It is not about looking for a word, but how they conceptualized healing and the world, past and present. I see too many times people just MSUing, claiming it is some ancient tradition. Well maybe or maybe not, I would like to see some evidence when one makes such claims. I see great harm for the profession and even students understanding and learning CM by integrating such concepts (and words) haphazardly into the CM vocabulary and treatment modalities. Unless I missed some post, no evidence is present to date, just vagueness. So you say moxa and needle are all frequencies. Ok.. but to me this is just mumbo jumbo. What does it really mean? What does viewing a needle as a frequency mean? How does this inform your treatment? Again I doubt the Chinese had any concept of this, but I could be wrong. But like I said before if you are just saying everything in this universe has different frequencies (via modern physics) then fine, but I can not see how viewing things in this manner impacts on how this helps our healing. So it is not about being conservative or closed to such ideas, it is about representing some set of 'truth'. Because I don't buy that Chinese thought of healing with energy vortices and frequencies has nothing to do with conservatism. This is a CM herbalist discussion board. As real as auras may be, by saying that huang qi enters the yellow part of aura and can clean out any past life traums, is just not CM. Hey it may be true, but representing CM in this manner does us no good to further our profession. Same is said for energy vortices. Hey I am as open to the vibrational man as the next guy, but no one has defined anything. No has explained really what this means from a CM perspective. I am waiting for something more than just parroting (ripping off) concepts from modern physics. - If we only seek > an > absoloute word for this then we miss the bigger picture. There are > already > too many conservative zealots out there, lets not add anymore. It tends > to > get in the way of good practice. > > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > > > > > > " " <alonmarcus > > > > > >Re: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > >Thu, 29 Sep 2005 21:01:59 -0700 > > > >But if you are saying that Chinese used the > >concept of vibration is some real theapetic way, then this is useful, but > >should be explained. If you say is rooted in energy > >vortices, then fine. But Vibration Orr energy vortice must be defined > and > >then showed how the Chinese actually used this concept. > > >>>> > >Jason > >the only thing i can think of is sound used in qi gong therapies > > > > > > > >Oakland, CA 94609 > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 > > > On Behalf Of mike Bowser > Friday, September 30, 2005 6:43 AM > > RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > > Jason, > > It sounds like we need to go back to square one here. The universe is > made > up of vibrations and this is not a newagey idea but one that is grounded > in > modern physics. Just because you do not like it does not make it so. The > movement of energetic matter is observed in the concepts of yin and yang. > > Second, from this concept one can see that the ancient peoples did > recognize > the interconnections or mirror of the greater universe within the smaller > internal one as being the same. At least that concept was part of my > education, not too sure what everyone else received. As a scholar of CM, > I > would expect that you would have many more examples of this then me but I > can easily come up with more. > > In passing, I am curious why we tend to accept the inclusion of WM into > TCM > more so than we accept physics? I will tell you - Because western medicine is medicine. Has an immense amount of potential to heal. Physics are ideas on how our universe works. Does physics really have much more to offer the healing of our patients? Ha ha - Show me where. All I have heard are a couple a rip-off phrases from something like 'the dao of physics' - Which BTW is riddled with errors. You may like to explain your work to your patients with these new-age / physics terms and they may say " yeah man, right on " - and everyone is happy. But show me where your practice is directly changed by our understanding of quantum physics... Actually western medicine probably benefits way more from our modern understandings. That is enough, this is silly... - Physics has much more to offer us but > maybe > it is because we lack education or maybe we do not see the strong WM > influence already in TCM. Thanks for the chat. > > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > > Jaso > > > > " " > > > > > >RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > >Thu, 29 Sep 2005 21:54:55 -0600 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Behalf Of mike Bowser > > > Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:30 PM > > > > > > RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > > > > > > Jason, > > > > > > I am a little concerned and confused as to why the reluctance to see > >both > > > the connection and importance of vibrations in ancient theory. This > is > > > not > > > a sign of drug induced psychosis. > > > > > > They might not have stated the word exactly as we would have liked but > > > they > > > knew of it when it was lacking, stagnant or even how to use it in > > > treatment. > > > While the idea of a certain term might not be accurate, the hidden > >side > > > of > > > this is that they knew about it. Many things of the past were hidden > >for > > > a > > > reason and much knowledge came thru lineages related to families. > > > >I always find it convenient that when some idea that is not documented > >anywhere is claimed to come from an oral tradition, or whatever. I don't > >discount oral traditions, but am skeptical of concepts or usages that not > >only sound odd, but are just not found anywhere else. But that is just > me. > >I personally stick to the mounds and mounds and volumes and volumes of > >recorded information. But before I invest in some idea like the yang-wei > >corresponds to the aura or the foundation of CM are energy vortices or > >whatever, you are going to have to do a lot of convincing. You say > ancient > >theory relies on vibrations (or whatever) - What are you talking about? > >What does that mean? How do you define vibrations. Hey if you just mean > >everything in the universe is some vibration therefore everything is > >vibration, fine, but this IMO it is so vague and newagey I don't even > know > >what to do with it. You may want to start putting homeopathics at those > >specific vibrations on acu points or something, and that is all fine, but > >let us be clear this is not CM. But if you are saying that Chinese used > >the > >concept of vibration is some real theapetic way, then this is useful, but > >should be explained. If you say is rooted in energy > >vortices, then fine. But Vibration Orr energy vortice must be defined > and > >then showed how the Chinese actually used this concept. > >So if you feel like putting the effort in, I would like to see a solid > >argument on the connection and importance of vibrations in ancient theory. > >This, to be worthwhile, would have to have some source. That source > would > >have to be some words, so we can discuss such an issue. Granted it is > not > >clear exactly what is being said in classical texts, there is in general > >much debate. But the point is, there is debate, and people formulate > well > >laid out arguments based on the texts. At least to convince me of such > >ideas you will have to do more than vague mentions, or claim oral > >tradition. > >But that is just me. So if they knew of these concepts please educate me. > > > >- > > > Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, including > board approved continuing education classes, an annual conference and a > free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Mike, I am not trying to be disrespectful, because I appreciate your enthusiasm about physics. I've also read many books about physics, quantum reality, etc., but at the end of the day, physics is a very complex discipline and difficult venture indeed. It is equally complex, if not more so, as Chinese medicine if not more so, so in order to understand the interface of Chinese medicine and physics, we need to engage physicists with an open mind who also have a working understanding of Chinese medicine. Very difficult to find at this point. I've been looking for years. On Sep 30, 2005, at 5:43 AM, mike Bowser wrote: > Jason, > > It sounds like we need to go back to square one here. The universe > is made > up of vibrations and this is not a newagey idea but one that is > grounded in > modern physics. Just because you do not like it does not make it > so. The > movement of energetic matter is observed in the concepts of yin and > yang. > > Second, from this concept one can see that the ancient peoples did > recognize > the interconnections or mirror of the greater universe within the > smaller > internal one as being the same. At least that concept was part of my > education, not too sure what everyone else received. As a scholar > of CM, I > would expect that you would have many more examples of this then me > but I > can easily come up with more. > > In passing, I am curious why we tend to accept the inclusion of WM > into TCM > more so than we accept physics? Physics has much more to offer us > but maybe > it is because we lack education or maybe we do not see the strong WM > influence already in TCM. Thanks for the chat. > > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 > > > On Behalf Of > Friday, September 30, 2005 7:47 AM > > Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > > , " " <@c...> > wrote: > > > > > I always find it convenient that when some idea that is not documented > > anywhere is claimed to come from an oral tradition, or whatever. I > don't > > discount oral traditions, but am skeptical of concepts or usages that > not > > only sound odd, but are just not found anywhere else. But that is just > me. > > I am with you, brother. Glad to see someone holding the mantle. fight > the good fight. its > all that remains to prevent the total degeneration of the actual tradition. > We can't just > discount oral traditions, but consider carefully whether the ancient > chinese could have > actually conceived an idea. As I understand it, concepts like energy and > vortices are > derived from modern physics and were completely unknown in any fashion to > the ancients. > ideas that sound similar must then be the product of modern minds looking > backwards > and extrapolating, rather than a true discovery of what the ancients > thought (this applies > to most of the mystical and jungian BS, as well). I would go even further > and say that > unless you at least read chinese and have read extensively, you may be a > good herbalist, > but you (like me) have no clue what was really on the minds of these > ancient docs. That is > why I always deferred to scholars and consensus in my teaching and > practice. And to go > even further, it may be unethical to practice even valid but idiosyncratic > traditions when > effective but perhaps more mundane approaches are much better documented. Hear Hear... This is a great point! Most of the time when people are talking energy vortices etc. they actually have very limited CM knowledge. They grasp for peripheral straws instead of studying CM deeper and actually learn something that has been around for 1000 years. Of course they feel special because they are integrating 'modern physics'. Sounds good on paper. But many such treatment methods (from the unrooted, pseudo-science) has no basis in CM and probably BS all around. I think it is only responsible to CM and one's patients to thoroughly research what CM says past and present, know the theories inside and out, study & practice extensively for years, read Chinese etc, before making up or integrating in such theories. Spouting off on what the Chinese thought 2000 years takes a lot of kahunas. One should back up there claims. This is science, this is medicine. But when one branches out without a firm foundation of what is really said and practiced in CM, then there is a disconnect, and the medicine suffers on many levels. The turtle wins the race. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Fritjov Capra, of course I know about. He actually was critical of some aspects of Chinese medicine in one of his books, although he definitely is a supporter of it. The part in " Tao of Physics " I enjoyed the most was his description of Niels Bohr's coat of arms, which had the yin/yang symbol. I also have several books such as " DNA and the I Ching " , " Book of Changes and Traditional " that give some interesting parallels between physics and Chinese medicine. I also spent time visiting with Stuart Kauffman, author of " At Home in the Universe " , a complexity scientist, in Santa Fe a few years ago. He was very interested in Chinese medicine, but strongly discounted parallels between Yi Jing theory and complexity theory. All I am saying is that in order to take any of this physics/Chinese medicine interface seriously, we need people to do serious work, not just generalities. I think most people tend to draw conclusions too quickly when comparing physics to other disciplines, usually artistic ones. There is a healthy balance of embracing and skepticism that needs to be maintained. One extreme leads to close-mindedness, the other to blurring the boundaries between fields of knowledge. On Sep 30, 2005, at 3:36 PM, mike Bowser wrote: > Zev, > > Two names come to mind. The first is that of Fritjof Capra " Tao of > Physics " > and other is Yin Lo " Biophysics Basis for Acupuncture and Health " . > I have > had contact with Dr. Lo and seems to be very willing to share his > ideas with > the profession. I think he is a faculty with AUCM out of L A. > > I think that it might be a good idea to recommend coursework for > future OM > graduates to have taken. > > > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 M'boy, I've got enough to do to last me the next two years. Can't take on anything else right now. On Sep 30, 2005, at 4:14 PM, mike Bowser wrote: > Zev, > > So what areas of research are you proposing and how would you go > about it? > > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Z'ev, and Mike, The work done by WK WANG and his research team might be interesting to you. WANG got his PhD in Biophysics from Johns Hopkins and spent almost 20 years researching pulse. These are pretty serious research with resonance model behind it. I am attaching some of the abstracts here. Enjoy! Mike L. ............................................... IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Jan;51(1):193-5. Related Articles, Links Comment in: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Jan;51(1):196-7. The natural frequencies of the arterial system and their relation to the heart rate. Lin Wang YY, Jan MY, Shyu CS, Chiang CA, Wang WK. Department of Physics, National Taiwan Normal University, no. 88, Sec. 4, Ting-Chou Rd., Taipei 116, Taiwan. yuhying We assume the major function of the arterial system is transporting energy via its transverse vibration to facilitate the blood flowing all the way down to the microcirculation. A highly efficient system is related to maintaining a large pressure pulse along the artery for a given ventricular power. The arterial system is described as a composition of many infinitesimal Windkessels. The strong tethering in the longitudinal direction connects all the Windkessels together and makes them vibrate in coupled modes. It was assumed that at rest condition, the arterial system is in a steady distributed oscillatory state, which is the superposition of many harmonic modes of the transverse vibration in the arterial wall and the adherent blood. Every vibration mode has its own characteristic frequency, which depends on the geometry, the mass density, the elasticity, and the tethering of the arterial system. If the heart rate is near the fundamental natural frequency, the system is in a good resonance condition, we call this " frequency matching. " In this condition, the pulsatile pressure wave is maximized. A pressure wave equation derived previously was used to predict this fundamental frequency. The theoretical result gave that heart rate is proportional to the average high-frequency phase velocity of the pressure wave and the inverse of the animal body length dimension. The area compliance related to the efficiency of the circulatory system is also mentioned. ------ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1 Pt 1):36-43. Related Articles, Links Influencing the heart rate of rats with weak external mechanical stimulation. Hsiu H, Jan MY, Wang YY, Wang WK. Department of Electric Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. The ventricular-arterial coupling is assumed to minimize the expenditure of cardiac energy. From the conjecture of the resonance theory, the arterial system transmits pressure waves and resonates with the heartbeat, therefore, the arterial system is similar to a mechanical resonator. Theoretically, the heart rate can be paced with weak external mechanical stimulation and corresponding blood pressure changes can be observed. A waterbed was activated to generate 0.5-mmHg pressure vibrations as a stimulus and the rate was set to deviate 5% from the control heart rate. Among 13 studies on seven rats, the linear regression between X (stimulation frequency--control heart rate) and Y (actual changes of the heart rate) is Y = 0.992X = 0.062 (Hz) with a correlation coefficient of 0.97 (Y = X implies complete steering). The intercorrelation coefficient between the change in mean blood pressure and the heart rate was 0.79. The study showed that this weak mechanical stimulation influences the heart rate, and the blood pressure changes according to the heart rate. Cardiovascular optimization and the resonance theory may explain the way one may regulate the heart rate and the blood pressure of humans noninvasively in the future. ---- Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2003 Feb;24(2):145-51. Related Articles, Links Evaluation of herbal formulas by pulse analysis method. Wang WK, Hsu TL, Bau JG, Wang-Lin YY. Biophysics Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, China. AIM: To distinguish the component difference between two similar herbal formulas by pulse analysis method. Many Chinese herbs were found to have specific effects on the Fourier components of the blood pressure pulse; it might infer a specific blood redistribution process on the body and reflect the health conditions of specific organs or tissues. The pulse effect of an herbal formula was similar to the linear combination of all its herbal compositions. METHODS: Two different versions of the herbal formula Liu-Wei-Dihuang were fed to the Wistar rats as a single blind test. The blood pressure pulses on the rat tail artery were recorded and then transformed to the frequency domain by Fourier analyzer. RESULTS: Formula A, Bai-Wei-Dihuang, with two more herbs Cortex Cinnamomi and Radix Aconiti added to Liu-Wei-Dihuang, increased the harmonic proportion of the 1st harmonic (C1) but decreased C4, C5. Formula B is composed in the same way but without Rhizoma Batatatis and Poria cocos; it increased the DC of the pulse spectrum (C0), but decreased C2, C3, C4, C5, C6. CONCLUSION: The component adjustment of an herbal formula could be distinctly and quantitatively detected by pulse analysis method. ------- Am J Chin Med. 2000;28(2):279-89. Related Articles, Links Influence of spleen meridian herbs on the harmonic spectrum of the arterial pulse. Wang WK, Bau JG, Hsu TL, Wang YY. Biophysics Lab, Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan. Pulse analysis is a powerful method in Chinese medicine. We suggest that the effect of herbal medicine is to redistribute the blood to organs and meridians. In this report, by injecting extracts into rats and then analyzing the blood pressure wave measured at the caudate arteries, we studied eight important spleen meridian related herbs: They were Semen Lablab, Fructus Amomi Globosi, Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae, Rhizoma Atractylodis, Tuber Pinelliae, Radix Codonopsitis, Pericarpium Aurantii and Rhizoma Polygonati. All eight herbs increased the intensity of the 3rd harmonic (C3) of the pressure pulse which is correlated to the spleen and spleen meridian, as described in traditional Chinese medical literature. All of them also increased the 2nd harmonic (which is correlated to the kidney and the kidney meridian) as well as decreased the heart load (DC term of pressure wave, C0). Tuber Pinelliae, Radix Codonopsitis, Pericarpium Aurantii and Rhizoma Polygonati decreased the 1st harmonic (correlated to the liver meridian) significantly, while Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae only decreased C1 slightly. Except for Semen Lablab, all the others decreased the intensity of the 5th (stomach meridian) and the 7th harmonics. The effects of kidney herbs: Cortex Eucommiae and Radix Achyranthis were also shown for comparison. -------- IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2000 May-Jun;19(3):106-11. Related Articles, Links The importance of pulsatile microcirculation in relation to hypertension. Jan MY, Hsiu H, Hsu TL, Wang YY, Wang WK. Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University. ------ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000 Mar;47(3):313-8. Related Articles, Links Effect of length on the fundamental resonance frequency of arterial models having radial dilatation. Wang YY, Lia WC, Hsiu H, Jan MY, Wang WK. Department of Physics, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, R.O.C. wkwang The pressure wave moving along an elastic artery filled with blood was examined as a moving Windkessel having a natural oscillation angular frequency nu 0 and a damping coefficient b. The radial directional motion for an element of the wall segment and the adherent fluid was considered. This equation was solved with conditions at both ends of an artery of length L. An external impulse force was applied at one end and a static pressure Po at the other. Analytic solution allowed only certain oscillation modes of resonance frequencies fn, where fn2 = a + cnL-2 with [formula: see text] and V infinity is the high frequency phase velocity. The relationship between f0 and L was examined experimentally for tubes constructed of latex, rubber, or dissected aorta. The effect of raising the static pressure P0 or increasing the tension in the tube was consistent with the prediction. The hypertension that accompanies an augmentation in arterial wall and the association between the heart rate and the mean blood pressure were discussed. -------- IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1999 Jan-Feb;18(1):73-5. Related Articles, Links Pulse analysis of patients with severe liver problems. Studying pulse spectrums to determine the effects on other organs. Lu WA, Wang YY, Wang WK. Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University. Publication Types: Clinical Trial ------- Am J Chin Med. 1998;26(1):73-82. Related Articles, Links Liu-wei-dihuang: a study by pulse analysis. Wang WK, Hsu TL, Wang YY. Biophysics Laboratory, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. Pulse analysis method was used in studying the traditional Chinese formula Liu-Wei-Dihuang as well as five of its main components (Rehmannia glutinosa, Cornus officinalis, Paeonia Suffruticosa, Poria cocos and Alisma plantogo-aquatica var oriental). Based on our recently developed resonance theory, we tried to elucidate the mechanism and mutual reactions of these meridian related herbs. Hot water herbal extracts were injected intraperitoneally into rats and the pressure pulse spectrum at the caudate artery was measured. The results of this study indicated that Liu-Wei-Dihuang mildly increased blood flow to meridians with lower resonance frequency: namely the liver C1, the kidney C2 and the spleen C3; but decreased blood flow to the higher resonance frequency organs and meridians: the lung C4, the stomach C5, the gall bladder C6, and the bladder C7. It also decreased the heart load C0. All of the five herb components increased blood flow to the kidney C2 and the spleen C3; but their effects on the high frequency organs varied. Alisma plantogo-aquatica var. oriental decreased the C0, C5, C6, C7; Poria cocos decreased C1, C4, C5, C6; Rehmannia glutinosa, Paeonia Suffruticosa decreased C0, C4, C5, C6, C7; Cornus officinalis increased C4 but decreased C0, C5, C6, C7. ------- Am J Chin Med. 1997;25(3-4):357-66. Related Articles, Links Pulse spectrum study on the effect of sie-zie-tang and Radix aconiti. Wang WK, Hsu TL, Chiang Y, Wang YY. Biophysics Laboratory, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. Extracts of the traditional Chinese formula Sie-Zie-Tang as well as one of its main components, Radix Aconiti were injected into rats intraperitoneally to observe pressure wave spectrum changes at the caudate artery. We found that Radix Aconiti decreased the C0 (DC term of the pulse), C5 and C6 (the harmonic proportions of the 5th and the 6th harmonic), but increased C2 and C3 (the harmonic proportions of the second and the third harmonic) significantly. For Sie-Zie-Tang, the increases of C2, C3, and C4 were accompanied by the decreasing of C0. The decreases of C5, C6 were small and not significant. The additional ingredients in the formula reduce toxic side effects (arrhythmia or heart failure caused by faster and stronger heart beat) due to Radix Aconiti. For human subjects, low dose Sie-Zie-Tang tends to normalize the Fourier components of the pressure wave. Orally taking the formula elevates the harmonic proportion of the harmonic that is lower than normal, but suppresses the higher one. Our results provides a possible mechanism for heart meridian related herbs. It strengthens heart beats, and normalizes energy distribution to different meridians. The study on Sie-Zie-Tang reveals another formula construction to reduce toxic side effects. Publication Types: Clinical Trial -------- IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1997 Jan-Feb;16(1):51-6. Related Articles, Links Pressure wave propagation in arteries. A model with radial dilatation for simulating the behavior of a real artery. Wang YY, Chang CC, Chen JC, Hsiu H, Wang WK. Dept. of Physics, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei. -------- The importance of pulsatile microcirculation in relation to hypertension Ming-Yie Jan Hsin Hsiu Tse-Lin Hsu Yuh-Ying Lin Wang Wei-Kung Wang Dept. of Electr. Eng., Nat. Taiwan Univ., Taipei ; This paper appears in: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE Publication May/Jun 2000 On page(s): 106-111 Volume: 19, Issue: 3 ISSN: 0739-5175 References Cited: 26 CODEN: IEMBDE -- Abstract: The aim of the study presented was to prove that increased pulsatile blood pressure (PBP) increases perfusion in peripheral vascular beds (PVBs). We used a laser Doppler flowmeter (LDF) to measure surface renal cortical flux (RCF) and a pressure-tip transducer catheter to measure abdominal aortic blood pressure (AABP). Besides demonstrating the relationship between RCF and AABP by linear regressive analysis with an averaged periodogram (AP), we also used time-domain pulse averaging to clarify the pulsatile AABP and RCF. Furthermore, we define a flux-to-pressure-area ratio (FPAR) to evaluate the efficiency by which the pulsatile AABP drives RCF ----------- The natural frequencies of the arterial system and their relation to the heart rate Yuh-Ying Lin Wang Ming-Yie Jan Ching-Show Shyu Chi-Ang Chiang Wei-Kung Wang Dept. of Phys., Nat. Taiwan Normal Univ., Taipei, Taiwan; This paper appears in: Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Publication Jan. 2004 On page(s): 193- 195 Volume: 51, Issue: 1 ISSN: 0018-9294 -- Abstract: We assume the major function of the arterial system is transporting energy via its transverse vibration to facilitate the blood flowing all the way down to the microcirculation. A highly efficient system is related to maintaining a large pressure pulse along the artery for a given ventricular power. The arterial system is described as a composition of many infinitesimal Windkessels. The strong tethering in the longitudinal direction connects all the Windkessels together and makes them vibrate in coupled modes. It was assumed that at rest condition, the arterial system is in a steady distributed oscillatory state, which is the superposition of many harmonic modes of the transverse vibration in the arterial wall and the adherent blood. Every vibration mode has its own characteristic frequency, which depends on the geometry, the mass density, the elasticity, and the tethering of the arterial system. If the heart rate is near the fundamental natural frequency, the system is in a good resonance condition, we call this " frequency matching " . In this condition, the pulsatile pressure wave is maximized. A pressure wave equation derived previously was used to predict this fundamental frequency. The theoretical result gave that heart rate is proportional to the average high-frequency phase velocity of the pressure wave and the inverse of the animal body length dimension. The area compliance related to the efficiency of the circulatory system is also mentioned. <zrosenbe wrote: M'boy, I've got enough to do to last me the next two years. Can't take on anything else right now. On Sep 30, 2005, at 4:14 PM, mike Bowser wrote: > Zev, > > So what areas of research are you proposing and how would you go > about it? > > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > for Good Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Fascinating stuff Mike, thanks for translating it for us! On Sep 30, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Mike Liaw wrote: > Z'ev, and Mike, > > The work done by WK WANG and his research team might be interesting > to you. > WANG got his PhD in Biophysics from Johns Hopkins and spent almost > 20 years researching pulse. > > These are pretty serious research with resonance model behind it. > I am attaching some of the abstracts here. > > Enjoy! > > Mike L. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 > > > On Behalf Of mike Bowser > Friday, September 30, 2005 5:44 PM > > RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > > Jason, > > It seems that you are very reluctant to accept that physics has anything > to > do with modern or ancient reality. Have you taken any college physics > courses? Yes, quite a bit... You are completely missing the point. I am purely talking about what CM is and how the Chinese viewed reality and medicine. That is it. Physics will always explain any reality because that is what it does. But physics theories always change, and in 100 years, many of today's theories will probably be outdated. To latch on to some modern concept and link that to ancient china is foolhardy. Remember many of Einstein's theories have been shown to be inadequate / even sometimes now considered wrong. > > It seems logical to make the connection with many examples that I have > drawn > and so I think the issue may be more related to difficulty with acceptance > than proof. Mike, you have not proved anything. You have only made very general sweeping buzz word kitchy statements. I am waiting for something substantial. > True enough, but where is your claim to the sociological understanding of > these people? You mention above that we need to know what these people > > thought but you cannot prove to know even this. Books are good but they > > tell you little without a complete cultural background. I have not made any claims, I have only asked for you to substantiate yours. You are the one making the claims. But I will tell you what, books are clearly the most accessible window into knowing what these people thought. I will never claim to know exactly what they thought. But when you read texts like the neijing you get a good idea of many of their views; there are many things that you can say for pretty much certain - there are some things that you will never know. But it does give you some leg to stand on. And some starting point into figuring out the way they conceptualizes reality. Why do you think people like Unschuld have spent over 12+ years working on a translation... hhmmmmm.... It is the best and almost only window we have. I am not saying everything must fit nicely into some book, but so far you have not given any evidence that counters what I have read (in Chinese- past and present) and been taught by my Chinese professors. IMO, it sounds like you just have these assumptions based on your feeling on how you believe modern physics views reality... I am pretty sure that the Chinese 2000 years ago where on a completely different wave-link than our modern scientists. But that is just my guess... Furthermore, Where do you think you get a cultural background? Books, archeology etc... All very scientific. You have supplied no source, just your idea on how things are. This to me is BS. Do you have a specific oral tradition that you belong to? Maybe we could explore this avenue...? But really you haven't even shown how these ideas inform your practice / treatments; again you have only spoke in vague buzz words. It is just all too convenient to use 'modern physics' as your defense / source. This I do not buy. It only says to me you have no leg to stand on when it comes to presenting what the Chinese thought (or at least some idea) based on some evidence, archeology, texts, or something. Quoting over-simplified modern physics catch phrases and somehow assuming that a) this is some truth, but b) this is the basis of CM, is bad science. You also demonstrate your complete lack of understanding of Chinese language to think that all these characters are just pictures and you can interpret them anyway you want. You should study some basic Chinese before making such statements. As far as people like Jeffery yuen. As much respect as I have for the guy, half the time I (and many others) cannot figure out what he is saying. We have been over his notes multiple times trying to figure out how it all translates into treatments etc.- it is almost impossible. Furthermore, he misquotes the classic texts all the time, saying things that are just wrong, yet he claims that he is channeling the masters.. whatever... But I am sure he is a great practitioner. I am sure he has something good to say, but in comparison I would prefer to listen to someone like Guo Hui Liu who is securely grounded in the tradition of CM. That is a problem with oral tradition. Finally, CM has a long history of written record, and its transmission is not dependent on oral tradition. When you supply something of substance backing up your assumptions about CM's foundational matrix then I will respond, otherwise I am done. This is leading no where. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 > > > On Behalf Of mike Bowser > Friday, September 30, 2005 7:29 PM > > RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > > Jason, > > I happen to agree with your statement that, " Physics will always explain > any > reality because that is what it does. " That is similar to what I have > been > saying all along on this thread. The next question is how to make note of > them and investigate them. Thanks for agreeing. Ok. we agree??? Let me be clear, my quote is on the sarcastic side. It doesn't mean that physic's explanation is true. And it surely doesn't have anything to do with the way a traditional culture viewed reality. It is just one way to view reality (their way) and this lens, that they view reality through, is in constant flux... But you are right, we do need to figure out how to investigate this stuff. There is use in understanding it, but it is not easy. But I am pretty confident that there are other ways to view reality that are equally as valid. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Folks, Here I have been letting Mike take the heat for something I started, but he jumped in on it all by himself. Now I understand Jason, Alon, Todd et al. are trying to protect the credibility of CM from willy-nilly woo-woo-ness. I understand that one must be circumspect about how one uses words, especially with you guys. But basing your arguments on whether the ancient Chinese thought something or not is beside the point. Isaac Asimov once anonymously attended a college class that was teaching one of his short stories. The teacher was going on about how this and that was alluded to by the story, and Asimov piped up and said that that wasn't the author's intention, and he knew so because he wrote it. The teacher looked him square in the face and said, " Just because you wrote it, what makes you think you know everything there is to know about it? " To say the Chinese didn't know what a vortex was is strange. It's just an area of " energy " or " qi " or whatever-the-hell-you-wanta-call-it. Many people spend a lot of time studying what the founding fathers of the United States intended with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and what-have-you, and this is an extremely valuable thing to do. But at the end of the day, we must live with the country we intend, not what they intended. They're not here--they're dead, just like the ancient Chinese. Maybe we could contact them all through that guy on TV who talks to dead relatives. The real question is not what they thought, but what you and I think that matters now. Otherwise Chinese medicine is just a dead faith, not a living tradition. Personally, I'm all for keeping CM basically the way it is, or should be--the kind of way Bob Flaws teaches it and along that vein. Realistic. You and I would probably agree on the courses practitioners should be attending at seminars, which are the hard-core CM ones, not the woo-woo crap that seems to predominate these days. But because Einstein didn't agree with action at a distance doesn't make him right. He was disagreeing with fact, not theory. In the atomic theory sense, everything in the physical universe is an energy field, a vibrating hotbed of frequencies and forces and God knows what. And if the ancient Chinese didn't say that, so what? Joseph mike Bowser <naturaldoc1 wrote: Jason, I happen to agree with your statement that, " Physics will always explain any reality because that is what it does. " That is similar to what I have been saying all along on this thread. The next question is how to make note of them and investigate them. Thanks for agreeing. Mike W. Bowser, L Ac Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, including board approved continuing education classes, an annual conference and a free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Joseph... very, very well said. Perhaps we can move on. doug , Joseph Garner <jhgarner_1> wrote: > Folks, > Here I have been letting Mike take the heat for something I started, but he jumped in on it all by himself. Now I understand Jason, Alon, Todd et al. are trying to protect the credibility of CM from willy-nilly woo-woo-ness. I understand that one must be circumspect about how one uses words, especially with you guys. But basing your arguments on whether the ancient Chinese thought something or not is beside the point. > > Isaac Asimov once anonymously attended a college class that was teaching one of his short stories. The teacher was going on about how this and that was alluded to by the story, and Asimov piped up and said that that wasn't the author's intention, and he knew so because he wrote it. The teacher looked him square in the face and said, " Just because you wrote it, what makes you think you know everything there is to know about it? " > > To say the Chinese didn't know what a vortex was is strange. It's just an area of " energy " or " qi " or whatever-the-hell-you-wanta-call-it. Many people spend a lot of time studying what the founding fathers of the United States intended with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and what-have-you, and this is an extremely valuable thing to do. But at the end of the day, we must live with the country we intend, not what they intended. They're not here--they're dead, just like the ancient Chinese. Maybe we could contact them all through that guy on TV who talks to dead relatives. The real question is not what they thought, but what you and I think that matters now. Otherwise Chinese medicine is just a dead faith, not a living tradition. > > Personally, I'm all for keeping CM basically the way it is, or should be--the kind of way Bob Flaws teaches it and along that vein. Realistic. You and I would probably agree on the courses practitioners should be attending at seminars, which are the hard-core CM ones, not the woo-woo crap that seems to predominate these days. But because Einstein didn't agree with action at a distance doesn't make him right. He was disagreeing with fact, not theory. In the atomic theory sense, everything in the physical universe is an energy field, a vibrating hotbed of frequencies and forces and God knows what. And if the ancient Chinese didn't say that, so what? > Joseph > > mike Bowser <naturaldoc1@h...> wrote: > Jason, > > I happen to agree with your statement that, " Physics will always explain any > reality because that is what it does. " That is similar to what I have been > saying all along on this thread. The next question is how to make note of > them and investigate them. Thanks for agreeing. > > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > > > > > Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, including board approved continuing education classes, an annual conference and a free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Z'ev, Actually, I didn't do the translation I simply did the copy and paste. Mike L. --- <zrosenbe wrote: > Fascinating stuff Mike, thanks for translating it > for us! > > > On Sep 30, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Mike Liaw wrote: > > > Z'ev, and Mike, > > > > The work done by WK WANG and his research team > might be interesting > > to you. > > WANG got his PhD in Biophysics from Johns Hopkins > and spent almost > > 20 years researching pulse. > > > > These are pretty serious research with resonance > model behind it. > > I am attaching some of the abstracts here. > > > > Enjoy! > > > > Mike L. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 > > > On Behalf Of Joseph Garner > Friday, September 30, 2005 7:53 PM > > RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > > Folks, > Here I have been letting Mike take the heat for something I started, but > he jumped in on it all by himself. Now I understand Jason, Alon, Todd et > al. are trying to protect the credibility of CM from willy-nilly woo-woo- > ness. I understand that one must be circumspect about how one uses words, > especially with you guys. But basing your arguments on whether the ancient > Chinese thought something or not is beside the point. > > Isaac Asimov once anonymously attended a college class that was teaching > one of his short stories. The teacher was going on about how this and that > was alluded to by the story, and Asimov piped up and said that that wasn't > the author's intention, and he knew so because he wrote it. The teacher > looked him square in the face and said, " Just because you wrote it, what > makes you think you know everything there is to know about it? " > > To say the Chinese didn't know what a vortex was is strange. It's just an > area of " energy " or " qi " or whatever-the-hell-you-wanta-call-it. Many > people spend a lot of time studying what the founding fathers of the > United States intended with the Declaration of Independence and the > Constitution and what-have-you, and this is an extremely valuable thing to > do. But at the end of the day, we must live with the country we intend, > not what they intended. They're not here--they're dead, just like the > ancient Chinese. Maybe we could contact them all through that guy on TV > who talks to dead relatives. The real question is not what they thought, > but what you and I think that matters now. Otherwise Chinese medicine is > just a dead faith, not a living tradition. > > Personally, I'm all for keeping CM basically the way it is, or should be-- > the kind of way Bob Flaws teaches it and along that vein. Realistic. You > and I would probably agree on the courses practitioners should be > attending at seminars, which are the hard-core CM ones, not the woo-woo > crap that seems to predominate these days. But because Einstein didn't > agree with action at a distance doesn't make him right. He was disagreeing > with fact, not theory. In the atomic theory sense, everything in the > physical universe is an energy field, a vibrating hotbed of frequencies > and forces and God knows what. And if the ancient Chinese didn't say that, > so what? > Joseph I agree whole-heartily, I agree that everything can be viewed as freq, energy, or whatever depending on one's view. I could care less if the Chinese had such concepts, that is not the point. My beef is only the act of overlaying this onto CM and acting like that is clearly what is going on from their viewpoint. But I think you get that and I say lets move on... - > > mike Bowser <naturaldoc1 wrote: > Jason, > > I happen to agree with your statement that, " Physics will always explain > any > reality because that is what it does. " That is similar to what I have > been > saying all along on this thread. The next question is how to make note of > them and investigate them. Thanks for agreeing. > > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > > > > > Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, including > board approved continuing education classes, an annual conference and a > free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Mike, Here it is again. Mike L. ........................ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Jan;51(1):193-5. Related Articles, Links Comment in: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Jan;51(1):196-7. The natural frequencies of the arterial system and their relation to the heart rate. Lin Wang YY, Jan MY, Shyu CS, Chiang CA, Wang WK. Department of Physics, National Taiwan Normal University, no. 88, Sec. 4, Ting-Chou Rd., Taipei 116, Taiwan. yuhying We assume the major function of the arterial system is transporting energy via its transverse vibration to facilitate the blood flowing all the way down to the microcirculation. A highly efficient system is related to maintaining a large pressure pulse along the artery for a given ventricular power. The arterial system is described as a composition of many infinitesimal Windkessels. The strong tethering in the longitudinal direction connects all the Windkessels together and makes them vibrate in coupled modes. It was assumed that at rest condition, the arterial system is in a steady distributed oscillatory state, which is the superposition of many harmonic modes of the transverse vibration in the arterial wall and the adherent blood. Every vibration mode has its own characteristic frequency, which depends on the geometry, the mass density, the elasticity, and the tethering of the arterial system. If the heart rate is near the fundamental natural frequency, the system is in a good resonance condition, we call this " frequency matching. " In this condition, the pulsatile pressure wave is maximized. A pressure wave equation derived previously was used to predict this fundamental frequency. The theoretical result gave that heart rate is proportional to the average high-frequency phase velocity of the pressure wave and the inverse of the animal body length dimension. The area compliance related to the efficiency of the circulatory system is also mentioned. ------ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1 Pt 1):36-43. Related Articles, Links Influencing the heart rate of rats with weak external mechanical stimulation. Hsiu H, Jan MY, Wang YY, Wang WK. Department of Electric Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. The ventricular-arterial coupling is assumed to minimize the expenditure of cardiac energy. From the conjecture of the resonance theory, the arterial system transmits pressure waves and resonates with the heartbeat, therefore, the arterial system is similar to a mechanical resonator. Theoretically, the heart rate can be paced with weak external mechanical stimulation and corresponding blood pressure changes can be observed. A waterbed was activated to generate 0.5-mmHg pressure vibrations as a stimulus and the rate was set to deviate 5% from the control heart rate. Among 13 studies on seven rats, the linear regression between X (stimulation frequency--control heart rate) and Y (actual changes of the heart rate) is Y = 0.992X = 0.062 (Hz) with a correlation coefficient of 0.97 (Y = X implies complete steering). The intercorrelation coefficient between the change in mean blood pressure and the heart rate was 0.79. The study showed that this weak mechanical stimulation influences the heart rate, and the blood pressure changes according to the heart rate. Cardiovascular optimization and the resonance theory may explain the way one may regulate the heart rate and the blood pressure of humans noninvasively in the future. ---- Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2003 Feb;24(2):145-51. Related Articles, Links Evaluation of herbal formulas by pulse analysis method. Wang WK, Hsu TL, Bau JG, Wang-Lin YY. Biophysics Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, China. AIM: To distinguish the component difference between two similar herbal formulas by pulse analysis method. Many Chinese herbs were found to have specific effects on the Fourier components of the blood pressure pulse; it might infer a specific blood redistribution process on the body and reflect the health conditions of specific organs or tissues. The pulse effect of an herbal formula was similar to the linear combination of all its herbal compositions. METHODS: Two different versions of the herbal formula Liu-Wei-Dihuang were fed to the Wistar rats as a single blind test. The blood pressure pulses on the rat tail artery were recorded and then transformed to the frequency domain by Fourier analyzer. RESULTS: Formula A, Bai-Wei-Dihuang, with two more herbs Cortex Cinnamomi and Radix Aconiti added to Liu-Wei-Dihuang, increased the harmonic proportion of the 1st harmonic (C1) but decreased C4, C5. Formula B is composed in the same way but without Rhizoma Batatatis and Poria cocos; it increased the DC of the pulse spectrum (C0), but decreased C2, C3, C4, C5, C6. CONCLUSION: The component adjustment of an herbal formula could be distinctly and quantitatively detected by pulse analysis method. ------- Am J Chin Med. 2000;28(2):279-89. Related Articles, Links Influence of spleen meridian herbs on the harmonic spectrum of the arterial pulse. Wang WK, Bau JG, Hsu TL, Wang YY. Biophysics Lab, Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan. Pulse analysis is a powerful method in Chinese medicine. We suggest that the effect of herbal medicine is to redistribute the blood to organs and meridians. In this report, by injecting extracts into rats and then analyzing the blood pressure wave measured at the caudate arteries, we studied eight important spleen meridian related herbs: They were Semen Lablab, Fructus Amomi Globosi, Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae, Rhizoma Atractylodis, Tuber Pinelliae, Radix Codonopsitis, Pericarpium Aurantii and Rhizoma Polygonati. All eight herbs increased the intensity of the 3rd harmonic (C3) of the pressure pulse which is correlated to the spleen and spleen meridian, as described in traditional Chinese medical literature. All of them also increased the 2nd harmonic (which is correlated to the kidney and the kidney meridian) as well as decreased the heart load (DC term of pressure wave, C0). Tuber Pinelliae, Radix Codonopsitis, Pericarpium Aurantii and Rhizoma Polygonati decreased the 1st harmonic (correlated to the liver meridian) significantly, while Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae only decreased C1 slightly. Except for Semen Lablab, all the others decreased the intensity of the 5th (stomach meridian) and the 7th harmonics. The effects of kidney herbs: Cortex Eucommiae and Radix Achyranthis were also shown for comparison. -------- IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2000 May-Jun;19(3):106-11. Related Articles, Links The importance of pulsatile microcirculation in relation to hypertension. Jan MY, Hsiu H, Hsu TL, Wang YY, Wang WK. Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University. ------ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000 Mar;47(3):313-8. Related Articles, Links Effect of length on the fundamental resonance frequency of arterial models having radial dilatation. Wang YY, Lia WC, Hsiu H, Jan MY, Wang WK. Department of Physics, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, R.O.C. wkwang The pressure wave moving along an elastic artery filled with blood was examined as a moving Windkessel having a natural oscillation angular frequency nu 0 and a damping coefficient b. The radial directional motion for an element of the wall segment and the adherent fluid was considered. This equation was solved with conditions at both ends of an artery of length L. An external impulse force was applied at one end and a static pressure Po at the other. Analytic solution allowed only certain oscillation modes of resonance frequencies fn, where fn2 = a + cnL-2 with [formula: see text] and V infinity is the high frequency phase velocity. The relationship between f0 and L was examined experimentally for tubes constructed of latex, rubber, or dissected aorta. The effect of raising the static pressure P0 or increasing the tension in the tube was consistent with the prediction. The hypertension that accompanies an augmentation in arterial wall and the association between the heart rate and the mean blood pressure were discussed. -------- IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1999 Jan-Feb;18(1):73-5. Related Articles, Links Pulse analysis of patients with severe liver problems. Studying pulse spectrums to determine the effects on other organs. Lu WA, Wang YY, Wang WK. Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University. Publication Types: Clinical Trial ------- Am J Chin Med. 1998;26(1):73-82. Related Articles, Links Liu-wei-dihuang: a study by pulse analysis. Wang WK, Hsu TL, Wang YY. Biophysics Laboratory, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. Pulse analysis method was used in studying the traditional Chinese formula Liu-Wei-Dihuang as well as five of its main components (Rehmannia glutinosa, Cornus officinalis, Paeonia Suffruticosa, Poria cocos and Alisma plantogo-aquatica var oriental). Based on our recently developed resonance theory, we tried to elucidate the mechanism and mutual reactions of these meridian related herbs. Hot water herbal extracts were injected intraperitoneally into rats and the pressure pulse spectrum at the caudate artery was measured. The results of this study indicated that Liu-Wei-Dihuang mildly increased blood flow to meridians with lower resonance frequency: namely the liver C1, the kidney C2 and the spleen C3; but decreased blood flow to the higher resonance frequency organs and meridians: the lung C4, the stomach C5, the gall bladder C6, and the bladder C7. It also decreased the heart load C0. All of the five herb components increased blood flow to the kidney C2 and the spleen C3; but their effects on the high frequency organs varied. Alisma plantogo-aquatica var. oriental decreased the C0, C5, C6, C7; Poria cocos decreased C1, C4, C5, C6; Rehmannia glutinosa, Paeonia Suffruticosa decreased C0, C4, C5, C6, C7; Cornus officinalis increased C4 but decreased C0, C5, C6, C7. ------- Am J Chin Med. 1997;25(3-4):357-66. Related Articles, Links Pulse spectrum study on the effect of sie-zie-tang and Radix aconiti. Wang WK, Hsu TL, Chiang Y, Wang YY. Biophysics Laboratory, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. Extracts of the traditional Chinese formula Sie-Zie-Tang as well as one of its main components, Radix Aconiti were injected into rats intraperitoneally to observe pressure wave spectrum changes at the caudate artery. We found that Radix Aconiti decreased the C0 (DC term of the pulse), C5 and C6 (the harmonic proportions of the 5th and the 6th harmonic), but increased C2 and C3 (the harmonic proportions of the second and the third harmonic) significantly. For Sie-Zie-Tang, the increases of C2, C3, and C4 were accompanied by the decreasing of C0. The decreases of C5, C6 were small and not significant. The additional ingredients in the formula reduce toxic side effects (arrhythmia or heart failure caused by faster and stronger heart beat) due to Radix Aconiti. For human subjects, low dose Sie-Zie-Tang tends to normalize the Fourier components of the pressure wave. Orally taking the formula elevates the harmonic proportion of the harmonic that is lower than normal, but suppresses the higher one. Our results provides a possible mechanism for heart meridian related herbs. It strengthens heart beats, and normalizes energy distribution to different meridians. The study on Sie-Zie-Tang reveals another formula construction to reduce toxic side effects. Publication Types: Clinical Trial -------- IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1997 Jan-Feb;16(1):51-6. Related Articles, Links Pressure wave propagation in arteries. A model with radial dilatation for simulating the behavior of a real artery. Wang YY, Chang CC, Chen JC, Hsiu H, Wang WK. Dept. of Physics, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei. -------- The importance of pulsatile microcirculation in relation to hypertension Ming-Yie Jan Hsin Hsiu Tse-Lin Hsu Yuh-Ying Lin Wang Wei-Kung Wang Dept. of Electr. Eng., Nat. Taiwan Univ., Taipei ; This paper appears in: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE Publication May/Jun 2000 On page(s): 106-111 Volume: 19, Issue: 3 ISSN: 0739-5175 References Cited: 26 CODEN: IEMBDE -- Abstract: The aim of the study presented was to prove that increased pulsatile blood pressure (PBP) increases perfusion in peripheral vascular beds (PVBs). We used a laser Doppler flowmeter (LDF) to measure surface renal cortical flux (RCF) and a pressure-tip transducer catheter to measure abdominal aortic blood pressure (AABP). Besides demonstrating the relationship between RCF and AABP by linear regressive analysis with an averaged periodogram (AP), we also used time-domain pulse averaging to clarify the pulsatile AABP and RCF. Furthermore, we define a flux-to-pressure-area ratio (FPAR) to evaluate the efficiency by which the pulsatile AABP drives RCF ----------- The natural frequencies of the arterial system and their relation to the heart rate Yuh-Ying Lin Wang Ming-Yie Jan Ching-Show Shyu Chi-Ang Chiang Wei-Kung Wang Dept. of Phys., Nat. Taiwan Normal Univ., Taipei, Taiwan; This paper appears in: Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Publication Jan. 2004 On page(s): 193- 195 Volume: 51, Issue: 1 ISSN: 0018-9294 -- Abstract: We assume the major function of the arterial system is transporting energy via its transverse vibration to facilitate the blood flowing all the way down to the microcirculation. A highly efficient system is related to maintaining a large pressure pulse along the artery for a given ventricular power. The arterial system is described as a composition of many infinitesimal Windkessels. The strong tethering in the longitudinal direction connects all the Windkessels together and makes them vibrate in coupled modes. It was assumed that at rest condition, the arterial system is in a steady distributed oscillatory state, which is the superposition of many harmonic modes of the transverse vibration in the arterial wall and the adherent blood. Every vibration mode has its own characteristic frequency, which depends on the geometry, the mass density, the elasticity, and the tethering of the arterial system. If the heart rate is near the fundamental natural frequency, the system is in a good resonance condition, we call this " frequency matching " . In this condition, the pulsatile pressure wave is maximized. A pressure wave equation derived previously was used to predict this fundamental frequency. The theoretical result gave that heart rate is proportional to the average high-frequency phase velocity of the pressure wave and the inverse of the animal body length dimension. The area compliance related to the efficiency of the circulatory system is also mentioned. --- mike Bowser <naturaldoc1 wrote: > Mike, > > Could you send me a copy of this it did not come > thru? > > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > > > Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Pressure wave propagation in arteries. A model with radial dilatation for simulating the behavior of a real artery. >>>>>>> Mike Do you have excess to the validation studies on the technologies they are using to assess these. I would like to examine it Thanks Oakland, CA 94609 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Personally, I'm all for keeping CM basically the way it is, or should be--the kind of way Bob Flaws teaches it and along that vein. >>>> Joseph I am just for clarity. I have no problem when we postulate modern ideas onto CM. But it must be stated as that. We cannot say it is CM. I am also one that believes we must do just that in order to develop and improve.CM can certainly use improvements. To do that we must be clear about what we know from historical CM and what we postulating, and then hopefully actually test any new or developed idea. Now with the advantages of understanding study designs we can actually do that better than at any time in the history of CM Oakland, CA 94609 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 , " " <zrosenbe@s...> wrote: It is equally > complex, if not more so, as Chinese medicine if not more so, so in > order to understand the interface of Chinese medicine and physics, we > need to engage physicists with an open mind who also have a working > understanding of Chinese medicine. Very difficult to find at this > point. I've been looking for years. > Z'ev and others, if you have the time take a look at Fons Wils' life work: http://www.ontheorigin.com/ He is a respected Belgian avant-garde physicist (nuclear physics, also studied general medicine) who came up with the theory of non-matter. This non-matter is able to explain several of the problems modern physics still have, and is partly extrapolated from Einstein's works. He has spent the last ten years of his life developing his theory: " Now, in the spring of 2004, I believe that I have gained sufficient insights to present – at last – a mathematically workable model that, as far as I'm concerned, forms the preliminary stages to new insights in physics. This model is based on a refined variant of my original hypothesis. This model demonstrates that understanding Nothingness is necessary to reveal the reason for the existence of the laws of physics. It tells why at a certain point Nothingness gave birth to time and matter. It also demonstrates that there is an intimate and transcendent correlation that affects matter from the moment of the origin of atoms. Molecules, life and consciousness owe their existence to this immaterial factor, which although unnoticeable for our scientific observation, is present in every form of development. " His theories can be used as an explanation for how homeopathy and acupuncture work as a form of energetic medicine. They can also be used to explain some paranormal findings and Rupert Sheldrake's morphogenetic fields. Sheldrake and Wils have been lecturing together recently. His work is very complex (at least to me) but it does offer insight in Daoist theories, Wu Wei, Yin-Yang interaction and the birth of the ten thousand things,... Wils has been teaching at Belgian's Jing Ming college for a few years now, offering students a modern explanation of the ancient Daoist concepts that still form the basis of the practice of Chinese medicine. A short version of his theory can be read here: http://www.ontheorigin.com/modules/xfsection/article.php?articleid=16 For the complete version of his work, go here: http://www.ontheorigin.com/modules/xfsection/article.php?articleid=26 Regards, Tom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 Alon, I don't have access to it but I know what's reported have gone thru rigorous modeling-theoretical derivation-prediction-experiment/verify process, as I know the quality of researches being done in the department where I graduated from. [ Certain credibility has to be established before one's paper can get on to IEEE journals. ] Mike L. <alonmarcus wrote: Pressure wave propagation in arteries. A model with radial dilatation for simulating the behavior of a real artery. >>>>>>> Mike Do you have excess to the validation studies on the technologies they are using to assess these. I would like to examine it Thanks Oakland, CA 94609 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 > > > On Behalf Of mike Bowser > Saturday, October 01, 2005 7:22 AM > > RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > > Jason, > > Whether you and I like it or not, people will make comparisons. We learn > at > an early age to do this and it follows us thru life. > > The big issue is how to study CM in a way that continues to be living and > dynamic. I have been writing a text to try to use the various western > sciences to help explain biological principles found in OM. It is a large > task but one that I feel will help students learn to reframe their > thinking > so that classical ideas remain usable. > > I am doing this because today's students seem to have a lot of problems > with > creating an integrated understanding in their own minds and abandon > classical principles because of clinical or other reasons. Clinical > reality > is not always the same as traditional writings. Agreed, so you are finding traditional writings that support all of this? I would like to see... _Jason > > By the way, I did not take your quote as sarcastic. As an aside, do see > that from this others can also have differring interpretations? > > > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > > > > > > " " > > > > > >RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > >Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:39:33 -0600 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Behalf Of mike Bowser > > > Friday, September 30, 2005 7:29 PM > > > > > > RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > > > > > > Jason, > > > > > > I happen to agree with your statement that, " Physics will always > explain > > > any > > > reality because that is what it does. " That is similar to what I have > > > been > > > saying all along on this thread. The next question is how to make > note > >of > > > them and investigate them. Thanks for agreeing. > > > >Ok. we agree??? Let me be clear, my quote is on the sarcastic side. It > >doesn't mean that physic's explanation is true. And it surely doesn't > have > >anything to do with the way a traditional culture viewed reality. It is > >just one way to view reality (their way) and this lens, that they view > >reality through, is in constant flux... But you are right, we do need to > >figure out how to investigate this stuff. There is use in understanding > it, > >but it is not easy. But I am pretty confident that there are other ways > to > >view reality that are equally as valid. > > > >- > > > > > Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, including > board approved continuing education classes, an annual conference and a > free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 Alon, I agree. If I got out of line at all with my semantics, I apologize. And I agree with Doug, let's move on. Let's talk about something we can use to improve our Chinese herbal medicine. Joseph <alonmarcus wrote: Personally, I'm all for keeping CM basically the way it is, or should be--the kind of way Bob Flaws teaches it and along that vein. >>>> Joseph I am just for clarity. I have no problem when we postulate modern ideas onto CM. But it must be stated as that. We cannot say it is CM. I am also one that believes we must do just that in order to develop and improve.CM can certainly use improvements. To do that we must be clear about what we know from historical CM and what we postulating, and then hopefully actually test any new or developed idea. Now with the advantages of understanding study designs we can actually do that better than at any time in the history of CM Oakland, CA 94609 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 Mike, I very much agree with what you say. Alon and Jason and Todd have their points to make also. I do not think we are very far apart in attitude, but we do have somewhat different perspectives. For better or worse, I find my life taking me into the direction of integrating this medicine with the Western model. I'm not always comfortable with this, but I try to make the best of it. I wish I had more Western medical training before instead of getting it on the job. I also wish I had more classical Chinese training. I wish I could read Han dynasty Chinese, and I plan to remedy both those deficiencies. One day at a time. For now, as far as Chinese is concerned, I think the main thing those of us who don't read much Chinese are missing out on is the latest developments in the field in China. Frankly, I'd rather be able to keep up with that than be able to read the classics first hand, though I certainly want to be able to do both. Joseph mike Bowser <naturaldoc1 wrote: Jason, My point in all of this was that there is an apparent connection, in my mind anyway, with these two things from differring historical times. I do not think that I am the only one who sees many of these connections either. In addition, if we remain as a limited static profession with no development then we are indeed " dead " . From various readings over the years it is apparent that CM was influenced and constantly changing and including new ideas from other places (so why can't we?). That makes it alive. I want this to remain and living, changing profession with high level educated practitioners. I do happen to think that if the profession is to survive then we need to make some inclusions of classes that will allow the next generation of practitioners to discuss CM with the scientific vernacular of the times, which I think is physics (quantum). We have seen a number of studies and articles on this post that are enlightening (pulse and physics). Let me just state that I do not oppose learning CM from its historical roots and actually think we need to re-write the school curricula to weed out the " TCM " and promote classica learning. But in the end, we are also healthcare providers and need to understand science and such as well. I do get a little concerned when this argument tends to come up as the practitioners from Asia are usually dually trained (WM and CM) and we complain about it bitterly. In the end, comparisons are a part of life and inevitable. Take care. Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > " " > > >RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology >Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:18:25 -0600 > > > > > > > > > On Behalf Of Joseph Garner > > Friday, September 30, 2005 7:53 PM > > > > RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology > > > > Folks, > > Here I have been letting Mike take the heat for something I started, but > > he jumped in on it all by himself. Now I understand Jason, Alon, Todd et > > al. are trying to protect the credibility of CM from willy-nilly >woo-woo- > > ness. I understand that one must be circumspect about how one uses >words, > > especially with you guys. But basing your arguments on whether the >ancient > > Chinese thought something or not is beside the point. > > > > Isaac Asimov once anonymously attended a college class that was teaching > > one of his short stories. The teacher was going on about how this and >that > > was alluded to by the story, and Asimov piped up and said that that >wasn't > > the author's intention, and he knew so because he wrote it. The teacher > > looked him square in the face and said, " Just because you wrote it, what > > makes you think you know everything there is to know about it? " > > > > To say the Chinese didn't know what a vortex was is strange. It's just >an > > area of " energy " or " qi " or whatever-the-hell-you-wanta-call-it. Many > > people spend a lot of time studying what the founding fathers of the > > United States intended with the Declaration of Independence and the > > Constitution and what-have-you, and this is an extremely valuable thing >to > > do. But at the end of the day, we must live with the country we intend, > > not what they intended. They're not here--they're dead, just like the > > ancient Chinese. Maybe we could contact them all through that guy on TV > > who talks to dead relatives. The real question is not what they thought, > > but what you and I think that matters now. Otherwise Chinese medicine is > > just a dead faith, not a living tradition. > > > > Personally, I'm all for keeping CM basically the way it is, or should >be-- > > the kind of way Bob Flaws teaches it and along that vein. Realistic. You > > and I would probably agree on the courses practitioners should be > > attending at seminars, which are the hard-core CM ones, not the woo-woo > > crap that seems to predominate these days. But because Einstein didn't > > agree with action at a distance doesn't make him right. He was >disagreeing > > with fact, not theory. In the atomic theory sense, everything in the > > physical universe is an energy field, a vibrating hotbed of frequencies > > and forces and God knows what. And if the ancient Chinese didn't say >that, > > so what? > > Joseph > >I agree whole-heartily, I agree that everything can be viewed as freq, >energy, or whatever depending on one's view. I could care less if the >Chinese had such concepts, that is not the point. My beef is only the act >of >overlaying this onto CM and acting like that is clearly what is going on >from their viewpoint. But I think you get that and I say lets move on... > >- > > > > > mike Bowser <naturaldoc1 wrote: > > Jason, > > > > I happen to agree with your statement that, " Physics will always explain > > any > > reality because that is what it does. " That is similar to what I have > > been > > saying all along on this thread. The next question is how to make note >of > > them and investigate them. Thanks for agreeing. > > > > Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > > > > > > > > > > Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, including > > board approved continuing education classes, an annual conference and a > > free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 Mike, People speak of what " the ancient Chinese " said as if they were all standing around with arms linked, thinking the same thoughts and speaking the same words at the same time. I'm sure the ancient Chinese disagreed on things as much as the modern Chinese do, as much as we do. No doubt they were studiously looking up what their ancient ancestors had to say on matters. I imagine some day thousands of years from now people will be looking up what we had to say on things. Everyone is just as real as everyone else and just as eligible to opine based on their experiences. And ultimately we are all on our own to make sense of it all. The best we can do with our medicine is to operate on consensus as much as we can build it. Modern science does not trust ancient authorities in the least and operates on supposedly reproducible experimental evidence, but that is hardly reliable either, given the Heisenberg principle and the fact that no experiment can cover all possibilities and ramifications: witness the wonder drugs that get pulled off the market with disturbing regularity. And these represent the state of the art in modern scientific validation methods. You know what my ultimate authority is? My gut. Joseph mike Bowser <naturaldoc1 wrote: Joseph, Nicely written. I am curious then as to what is CM. From this barrage of opinions it should be somewhat obvious that there is a great deal of disparity and contradiction. Much can be said about CM as well depending upon what time period and country you look at. We have the daunting challenge to make this one single medicine, not sure we can or even should try. This does tend to create challenging conversations on this post though, doesn't it? Mike W. Bowser, L Ac >Joseph Garner <jhgarner_1 > > >RE: Re: The Shang Han Lun and Homotoxicology >Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:53:14 -0700 (PDT) > >Folks, >Here I have been letting Mike take the heat for something I started, but he >jumped in on it all by himself. Now I understand Jason, Alon, Todd et al. >are trying to protect the credibility of CM from willy-nilly woo-woo-ness. >I understand that one must be circumspect about how one uses words, >especially with you guys. But basing your arguments on whether the ancient >Chinese thought something or not is beside the point. > >Isaac Asimov once anonymously attended a college class that was teaching >one of his short stories. The teacher was going on about how this and that >was alluded to by the story, and Asimov piped up and said that that wasn't >the author's intention, and he knew so because he wrote it. The teacher >looked him square in the face and said, " Just because you wrote it, what >makes you think you know everything there is to know about it? " > >To say the Chinese didn't know what a vortex was is strange. It's just an >area of " energy " or " qi " or whatever-the-hell-you-wanta-call-it. Many >people spend a lot of time studying what the founding fathers of the United >States intended with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution >and what-have-you, and this is an extremely valuable thing to do. But at >the end of the day, we must live with the country we intend, not what they >intended. They're not here--they're dead, just like the ancient Chinese. >Maybe we could contact them all through that guy on TV who talks to dead >relatives. The real question is not what they thought, but what you and I >think that matters now. Otherwise Chinese medicine is just a dead faith, >not a living tradition. > >Personally, I'm all for keeping CM basically the way it is, or should >be--the kind of way Bob Flaws teaches it and along that vein. Realistic. >You and I would probably agree on the courses practitioners should be >attending at seminars, which are the hard-core CM ones, not the woo-woo >crap that seems to predominate these days. But because Einstein didn't >agree with action at a distance doesn't make him right. He was disagreeing >with fact, not theory. In the atomic theory sense, everything in the >physical universe is an energy field, a vibrating hotbed of frequencies and >forces and God knows what. And if the ancient Chinese didn't say that, so >what? >Joseph > >mike Bowser <naturaldoc1 wrote: >Jason, > >I happen to agree with your statement that, " Physics will always explain >any >reality because that is what it does. " That is similar to what I have been >saying all along on this thread. The next question is how to make note of >them and investigate them. Thanks for agreeing. > >Mike W. Bowser, L Ac > > > > >Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, including >board approved continuing education classes, an annual conference and a >free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.