Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Nobel Prize 501 Years Late

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

From my blog: don't mean to talk down to the herbalists on the CHA

list, but this was written for a larger audience:

 

_____________

 

Australians Win Nobel Prize, but Chinese Were First

 

Gancao.net sends out a big congratulations to researchers Robin

Warren and Barry Marshall who rocked the gastro-intestinal world when

they identified H-pylori as a bacteria that plays a key role in many

stomach and intestinal ulcers.

 

Thanks to their work that challenged the conventional wisdom of the

day, ulcers that show positive for this bacteria are routinely

treated with antibiotics while the stress induced type are treated

with different drugs.

 

This is all well and good, but I just wanted to point out that TCM

treats ulcers in a variety of ways as well. Among the most common

syndromes we find is what we call " Liver attacking Stomach " which is

the stress-induced kind of ulcer, and the " Stomach Fire " type which

is treated with formulas that include Huang Lian.

 

Stomach Fire or heat can look like a bacterial infection now that we

have this term for it. The herb that addresses this particular

condition is called Huang Lian or " Coptis " (Rz. Coptidis). Guess

what? This herb has antibiotic tendencies.

 

The formula that address Stomach Fire type ulcers includes a healthy

dosage of Huang Lian. The formula is called Zhu Jin Wan and comes

from a book called Dan Xi Xin Fa or " Teachings of Dan Xi " This book

was written in 1481 thus beating the nobel prize winning Australians

by a mere 501 years.

 

This reminds me of the American myth that our continent was

discovered by Christopher Columbus rather than Leif Erikson and his

vikings or even the Asians who probably walked into North American

via a land bridge off the coast of Alaska eons before.

 

_____________

 

--

 

Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Oct 3, 2005, at 4:43 PM, wrote:

> The formula is called Zhu Jin Wan and comes 

> from a book called Dan Xi Xin Fa or " Teachings of Dan Xi " This book 

> was written in 1481 thus beating the nobel prize winning Australians 

> by a mere 501 years.

--

Al,

 

Don't you think we can do even better? Ban xia xie xin tang was

recorded circa 200ad in the Shang Han Lun. Although the disease of

stomach ulcer was not described at the time, the clinical symptom

picture for bxxxt would fit many cases with this diagnosis.

 

Rory

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rorry

Remember that classically Ban xia xie xin tang is not used for pain, although

this has changed now

alon

 

Rory Kerr <rorykerr wrote:

On Oct 3, 2005, at 4:43 PM, wrote:

> The formula is called Zhu Jin Wan and comes

> from a book called Dan Xi Xin Fa or " Teachings of Dan Xi " This book

> was written in 1481 thus beating the nobel prize winning Australians

> by a mere 501 years.

--

Al,

 

Don't you think we can do even better? Ban xia xie xin tang was

recorded circa 200ad in the Shang Han Lun. Although the disease of

stomach ulcer was not described at the time, the clinical symptom

picture for bxxxt would fit many cases with this diagnosis.

 

Rory

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Oct 3, 2005, at 8:38 PM, Alon Marcus wrote:

> Remember that classically Ban xia xie xin tang is not used for pain,

> although this has changed no

--

 

Right, but pain isn't necessarily a symptom of peptic ulcer.

 

Rory

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pain isn't necessarily a symptom of peptic ulcer.

>>>>>>>

Not necessary but extreemly common, much more common fullness without pain. At

the same time i have used the formula many times for peptic ulcers when modified

 

alon

 

Rory Kerr <rorykerr wrote:

On Oct 3, 2005, at 8:38 PM, Alon Marcus wrote:

> Remember that classically Ban xia xie xin tang is not used for pain,

> although this has changed no

--

 

Right, but pain isn't necessarily a symptom of peptic ulcer.

 

Rory

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Oct 4, 2005, at 1:59 PM, Alon Marcus wrote:

> pain isn't necessarily a symptom of peptic ulcer.

> >>>>>>>

> Not necessary but extreemly common, much more common fullness without

> pain. At the same time i have used the formula many times for peptic

> ulcers when modified

--

 

Right.

 

Anyway, I think the basic claim is reasonable.

 

Rory

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...