Guest guest Posted February 26, 2006 Report Share Posted February 26, 2006 Alon, See: http://www.herbalgram.org/default.asp?c=sawpalmBPH The problem with most of these studies is that there is no pattern differentiation. Whether it be TCM or an 'alternative' differentiation measuring blood metabolites to determine where the metabolic problem lies. --george On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:45 PM, wrote: > what do people think of this especially with all the positive studies > > Randomized Trial Of Saw Palmetto Versus Placebo Published In New > England Journal Of Medicine Suggests No Benefit > http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=38298 > > > > > > Oakland, CA 94609 > > > - > > > Saturday, February 25, 2006 7:12 PM > Re: Re: Low-Fat Diet Myth Busted > > > Zev, > China studies have been the basis for the low fat ideas. > > > > > Oakland, CA 94609 > > > - > > > Saturday, February 25, 2006 6:46 PM > Re: Re: Low-Fat Diet Myth Busted > > > I agree on all counts. The bias in studies such as these is a > great > disservice to the general public. It is too bad that the China > study > got such poor media coverage, it was superior in every detail. > > > On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Mark Melchiorre wrote: > >> I would suggest reading the actual studies or perhaps at least >> knowing >> the bias of the individual reporting on them. >> >> One of the details I pick up from the studies is that a low-fat diet >> was never really acheived. > > > > Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, > including board approved continuing education classes, an annual > conference and a free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2006 Report Share Posted February 26, 2006 George thanks. good review Oakland, CA 94609 - George Mandler Sunday, February 26, 2006 3:03 AM Re: Saw Palmetto NEJM study Alon, See: http://www.herbalgram.org/default.asp?c=sawpalmBPH The problem with most of these studies is that there is no pattern differentiation. Whether it be TCM or an 'alternative' differentiation measuring blood metabolites to determine where the metabolic problem lies. --george On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:45 PM, wrote: > what do people think of this especially with all the positive studies > > Randomized Trial Of Saw Palmetto Versus Placebo Published In New > England Journal Of Medicine Suggests No Benefit > http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=38298 > > > > > > Oakland, CA 94609 > > > - > > > Saturday, February 25, 2006 7:12 PM > Re: Re: Low-Fat Diet Myth Busted > > > Zev, > China studies have been the basis for the low fat ideas. > > > > > Oakland, CA 94609 > > > - > > > Saturday, February 25, 2006 6:46 PM > Re: Re: Low-Fat Diet Myth Busted > > > I agree on all counts. The bias in studies such as these is a > great > disservice to the general public. It is too bad that the China > study > got such poor media coverage, it was superior in every detail. > > > On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Mark Melchiorre wrote: > >> I would suggest reading the actual studies or perhaps at least >> knowing >> the bias of the individual reporting on them. >> >> One of the details I pick up from the studies is that a low-fat diet >> was never really acheived. > > > > Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, > including board approved continuing education classes, an annual > conference and a free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine. > > > > > Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, including board approved continuing education classes, an annual conference and a free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.