Guest guest Posted December 15, 2006 Report Share Posted December 15, 2006 All, The publisher numbers are key. Once way or another, regarless if sold on-line or at discount, in bookstores or anywhere else, books come from their publishers (provided they are not infringed). So, if the publishers are seeing declines that outlie any prior trend, it is close to certain that there is a new factor producing the new trend. Jason's theory that the numbers are bogus because the sales declines are from on-line discounting, etc., could be true if the substantive numbers came only from the downstream levels (e.g: distribuor and bookstores)or if the market were as limited as he sees it. Even then, however, the decline would be so far from established trends as to be suspicious. The only reason to put a number on the losses was to establish for the FBI that the infringement was not some penny ante student prank. No one has intended or claimed to have produced a definitive damage number. However, even if you only take Elsevier's estimate, it is not peanuts and surely worthy of prosecution. Furthermore, without taking the next year of my life off to communicate with the dozens and dozens of publishers infringed (remember those biomedical texts?) the obvious approach was to talk directly to the publishers most involved in CM work and get the situation into the hands of law enforcement as quickly and professionally as possible. If you read my piece to the FBI closely, the bookstore numbers fall under the category of " Tracing the Source, " we were looking for trends in the distribution pattern that would indicate some geographical information that might be of use in isolating a source. I will say that it is, in my opinion, moving from east to west and has influenced some places more than others. This, in fact, is reasonable evidence (coupled as it is with physical evidence), of a student-to-student transmission. Now that people are aware that there may be consequences, I hope the virus-like transmission doesn't reach as far as it might otherwise go. If it is in fact not reaching the west coast, I'm pleased. In the long run as more evidence is compiled, we will certainly see that some of my suppositions are wrong. It may be that there were no orders from here or there because there was no new class, or that a store closed, etc. Obviously, I do not have the resources or skills of an FBI agent and the best information will come from an investigation by law enforcement. We fully considered the likelyhood that the arrest of students who own or distribute the pirate DVD would create ill will. The " I'm a poor student " and " the publishers are ripping-us-off " meme's are certainly out there. However, the decision to pursue this matter came to this -- regardless of intention, regardless of numbers, regardless of what anyone thinks of one author, publisher or another, a profession that cannot protect its intellectual property will not survive. Personally, as a member of the book trade, someone who has earned money in the book business for close to 40 years, I felt that allowing this to pass unreported would be a dereliction of my ethical responsibilities. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.