Guest guest Posted December 31, 2006 Report Share Posted December 31, 2006 http://acupuncturetoday.com/mpacms/at/article.php?id=31448 I think Lisa Rohleder makes alot of assumptions in the article that are just not true. 1. working class people prefer their practitioners to dress and behave like they do; research shows most people of all types prefer their doctors to dress and act like the elitest professionals they are. 2. there is a huge market of working class folks out there just itching to get acupuncture. she has probably tapped a market in a notoriously liberal and progressive town that happens to be home to a rare breed (a sizable number of highly educated left-wing working class folks). it is not generally true that such a population exists in all major cities. I lived in portland for 13 years. I also lived in san diego for 5. like two different worlds. its great to serve poor people, but the fact remains that the vast majority of americans are middle-class and DO have health insurance. Her argument does not explain why so many of these folks choose not to use acupuncture services. A dirty little fact is that most chinese themselves also choose not to use acupuncture, even though is basically free in China. 3. that this model is the solution to the lack of success so many experience in the field. Lisa is clearly hardworking, enterprising and dedicated to her ideals. She has tapped a niche market. good for her. but having worked and been treated in a number of group settings (ITM's old IEP, Portland's PAAC, and a PCOM clinic that has just started up when I left town), I am pretty sure of a couple of things. I don't like either treating or being treated in such an environment. this is not an elitest position. it is a practical one. first of all, it is basically a perversion of HIPAA rules to put people in such a position that because they are poor, they will have to waive their privacy rights. I am sure everyone does this willingly, but they shouldn't have to. People should not kid themselves. Patients get treated in this way because they have no choice, not because most of them would prefer this to a private consultation. I am sure those who have figured out how to tap an untapped market are happy that they are actually able to earn a decent living. But the fact is that there are not an unlimited amount of potential acupuncture patients in any socioeconomic class. If there were, then usage rates amongst those can afford to pay would have increased between 1990 and 2005, rather than stayed flat about 15 of the population. the only way Lisa's argument can be seen as a panacea is if the largest segment of the population were working poor and this group was only not going for services cause they couldn't afford to pay. Chinese Herbs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2006 Report Share Posted December 31, 2006 I've always felt uncomfortable with her model. Perhaps if she had named it Affordable Acupuncture or Everyday Acupuncture I would feel better. Of course, people often balk at the $65 to 150 that colleagues charge. I've started charging probably the lowest rates in my area. It's my thought that people can more easily afford a lower rate several times a month than a slightly higher rate once a month. Perhaps I should start a movement of Artists Class Acupuncture. Although she has a lot of political reasoning, this is a brilliant marketing and branding device. And I'm not sure, like that this is the answer for a number of acupuncturists. In LA we have the very low-cost schools and through the schools, several public health facilities that are basically free. Yes, they are filled up with patients but I agree that the patients in many cases would prefer to have more private care. This is fine if you have neck pain or whatever that could benefit from 5 treatments a week but like it or not we fill a gatekeeper role to more serious conditions and large amounts of unhappiness and frustrations. I saw last year in China a lot of people still getting acupuncture in this kind of public setting. But as people now pay a little for treatments I see more and more privacy creeping in. In the internal medicine wards, there was almost as much privacy as here. Instead of a large room with people crowding around, there are cubicles where assessments are made. I've never used a flat relatively low-price as a marketing device. It's not something I feel proud about. I just got tired of trying to scope out what a person could really pay. And then feeling uncomfortable whith so many different rates, shaving money off here and there and charging more for the person who comes in next with what should be the same care. In Los Angeles my friend said the way to success would be to spruce up my Spanish and change my street sign to Acupunctura. So there are other solutions than the Working Class label. doug , < wrote: > > > http://acupuncturetoday.com/mpacms/at/article.php?id=31448 > > > I think Lisa Rohleder makes alot of assumptions in the article that > are just not true. > > 1. working class people prefer their practitioners to dress and > behave like they do; research shows most people of all types prefer > their doctors to dress and act like the elitest professionals they are. > > 2. there is a huge market of working class folks out there just > itching to get acupuncture. she has probably tapped a market in a > notoriously liberal and progressive town that happens to be home to a > rare breed (a sizable number of highly educated left-wing working > class folks). it is not generally true that such a population exists > in all major cities. I lived in portland for 13 years. I also lived > in san diego for 5. like two different worlds. its great to serve > poor people, but the fact remains that the vast majority of americans > are middle-class and DO have health insurance. Her argument does not > explain why so many of these folks choose not to use acupuncture > services. A dirty little fact is that most chinese themselves also > choose not to use acupuncture, even though is basically free in China. > > 3. that this model is the solution to the lack of success so many > experience in the field. Lisa is clearly hardworking, enterprising > and dedicated to her ideals. She has tapped a niche market. good for > her. but having worked and been treated in a number of group settings > (ITM's old IEP, Portland's PAAC, and a PCOM clinic that has just > started up when I left town), I am pretty sure of a couple of things. > I don't like either treating or being treated in such an environment. > this is not an elitest position. it is a practical one. first of all, > it is basically a perversion of HIPAA rules to put people in such a > position that because they are poor, they will have to waive their > privacy rights. I am sure everyone does this willingly, but they > shouldn't have to. People should not kid themselves. Patients get > treated in this way because they have no choice, not because most of > them would prefer this to a private consultation. I am sure those who > have figured out how to tap an untapped market are happy that they > are actually able to earn a decent living. But the fact is that there > are not an unlimited amount of potential acupuncture patients in any > socioeconomic class. If there were, then usage rates amongst those > can afford to pay would have increased between 1990 and 2005, rather > than stayed flat about 15 of the population. the only way Lisa's > argument can be seen as a panacea is if the largest segment of the > population were working poor and this group was only not going for > services cause they couldn't afford to pay. > > > > Chinese Herbs > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2006 Report Share Posted December 31, 2006 And it seems Portland has it's own public facility for acupuncture. Perhaps you worked here in Portland, Todd http://www.outsidein.org/acupuncture.htm The Chinese Medical Clinic is staffed by volunteer licensed acupuncturists as well as interns supervised by experienced doctors from the Oregon College of Oriental Medicine and the National College of Naturopathic Medicine's Chinese Medical Department. We offer excellent professional medical care for a wide variety of complaints. The atmosphere is friendly and soothing. Services are offered by appointment only, and an effort is made to allow patients to see the same practitioner repeatedly, though this is not always possible. The cost is based on a sliding scale, and the herbs and medications are always free of charge. A wide variety of modalities are offered at the Chinese medicine clinic including: Acupuncture (using one-time-use sterile disposable needles) Acupressure Moxabustion Tui na Gua sha Cupping Liniments Herbal Pills Herbal Powders Bulk Herbs for Teas Limited Massage ____________ , < wrote: > > > http://acupuncturetoday.com/mpacms/at/article.php?id=31448 > > > I think Lisa Rohleder makes alot of assumptions in the article that > are just not true. > > 1. working class people prefer their practitioners to dress and > behave like they do; research shows most people of all types prefer > their doctors to dress and act like the elitest professionals they are. > > 2. there is a huge market of working class folks out there just > itching to get acupuncture. she has probably tapped a market in a > notoriously liberal and progressive town that happens to be home to a > rare breed (a sizable number of highly educated left-wing working > class folks). it is not generally true that such a population exists > in all major cities. I lived in portland for 13 years. I also lived > in san diego for 5. like two different worlds. its great to serve > poor people, but the fact remains that the vast majority of americans > are middle-class and DO have health insurance. Her argument does not > explain why so many of these folks choose not to use acupuncture > services. A dirty little fact is that most chinese themselves also > choose not to use acupuncture, even though is basically free in China. > > 3. that this model is the solution to the lack of success so many > experience in the field. Lisa is clearly hardworking, enterprising > and dedicated to her ideals. She has tapped a niche market. good for > her. but having worked and been treated in a number of group settings > (ITM's old IEP, Portland's PAAC, and a PCOM clinic that has just > started up when I left town), I am pretty sure of a couple of things. > I don't like either treating or being treated in such an environment. > this is not an elitest position. it is a practical one. first of all, > it is basically a perversion of HIPAA rules to put people in such a > position that because they are poor, they will have to waive their > privacy rights. I am sure everyone does this willingly, but they > shouldn't have to. People should not kid themselves. Patients get > treated in this way because they have no choice, not because most of > them would prefer this to a private consultation. I am sure those who > have figured out how to tap an untapped market are happy that they > are actually able to earn a decent living. But the fact is that there > are not an unlimited amount of potential acupuncture patients in any > socioeconomic class. If there were, then usage rates amongst those > can afford to pay would have increased between 1990 and 2005, rather > than stayed flat about 15 of the population. the only way Lisa's > argument can be seen as a panacea is if the largest segment of the > population were working poor and this group was only not going for > services cause they couldn't afford to pay. > > > > Chinese Herbs > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.