Guest guest Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 Jing Lu, Waltham MA - Bob Flaws Monday, February 05, 2007 11:11 AM Cancer Referral List (Was Cancer Herbs) All, Ok, I have started a file on practitioners recommended for cancer refrrrals. So far, that list has the following names on it: Andrew Wu, SF area Michael Broffman, San Rafael, CA Issac Cohen, Berkeley, CA Yuan Wang, San Diego, CA Ming-ying Zhou, Boulder, CO I will keep these names in a separate Word file. When we get a bunch, I will then post that file back here on CHA. Come on group, this is something positive we can do. Please don't hesitate if you know anyone in your area who is actually qaulified to treat cancer patients. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 I have an addition for the cancer referral list. While at Bastyr in the early 90's, I studied with Tai Lahans who has chosen to specialize in TCM oncology & management of HIV/AIDS. I believe that she is currently teaching the oncology course at the Seattle Institute of Oriental Medicine, as well as operating her private practice in Seattle, WA (206) 726-0269. She is a knowledgeable & caring practitioner. There are several former patients that pop up on a google search of Tai's name, all extolling her virtues. I have found the information from her classes & writings a tremendous resource over the years. She has an oncology text that has been awaiting publication & can be found at Elsevier's website. Book info is: Integrating Conventional and in Cancer Care - A Clinical Guide By Tai Lahans, LAC, MTCM, MEd, Diplomate Chinese Herbal Medicine, NCCAOM, White Crane Clinic, Seattle, WA, USA Churchill Livingstone Title ISBN: 0443100632 ISBN-13: 9780443100635 Expected Release 06/29/2007 This new clinical resource clearly explains how to approach integrated care in a way that combines Chinese herbal medicine with Western medicine to enhance and improve medical care for patients with cancer – without undermining or negatively impacting patients' medical treatment. Each chapter covers a different type of cancer, first introducing the conventional medical understanding of that cancer including its etiology, diagnosis, and treatment according to staging and type. The chapter then covers that cancer from the perspective of Oriental medicine. Case studies illustrate the integration of treatment for each cancer type, raising important issues and considerations associated with specific cancers and treatments. Formulas are presented within the context of conventional treatment, intended to enhance the effectiveness of treatment and/or treat side effects without undermining the treatment's function. Each formula is followed by a discussion of how and why the herbs are used, including classical Chinese theory and relevant pharmaceutical studies. Staging and the age and performance status of various patients is used as a means by which to explain how formulas are changed. Case studies explore issues related to the integration of treatment for each type of cancer. For patients ( & practitioners) in the greater NW, she is a resource worth exploring. Jason Wright, MS, LAc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2007 Report Share Posted February 6, 2007 Thanks to those who have posted names and locations. Surely there must be more. Come on out there. Bob , " wrightatnycc " <wrightpoint wrote: > > I have an addition for the cancer referral list. While at Bastyr in > the early 90's, I studied with Tai Lahans who has chosen to > specialize in TCM oncology & management of HIV/AIDS. I believe that > she is currently teaching the oncology course at the Seattle > Institute of Oriental Medicine, as well as operating her private > practice in Seattle, WA (206) 726-0269. She is a knowledgeable & > caring practitioner. There are several former patients that pop up > on a google search of Tai's name, all extolling her virtues. I have > found the information from her classes & writings a tremendous > resource over the years. > > She has an oncology text that has been awaiting publication & can be > found at Elsevier's website. Book info is: > Integrating Conventional and in Cancer Care - A > Clinical Guide > By Tai Lahans, LAC, MTCM, MEd, Diplomate Chinese Herbal Medicine, > NCCAOM, White Crane Clinic, Seattle, WA, USA > Churchill Livingstone Title ISBN: 0443100632 ISBN-13: 9780443100635 > Expected Release 06/29/2007 > > This new clinical resource clearly explains how to approach > integrated care in a way that combines Chinese herbal medicine with > Western medicine to enhance and improve medical care for patients > with cancer – without undermining or negatively impacting patients' > medical treatment. Each chapter covers a different type of cancer, > first introducing the conventional medical understanding of that > cancer including its etiology, diagnosis, and treatment according to > staging and type. The chapter then covers that cancer from the > perspective of Oriental medicine. Case studies illustrate the > integration of treatment for each cancer type, raising important > issues and considerations associated with specific cancers and > treatments. > > Formulas are presented within the context of conventional treatment, > intended to enhance the effectiveness of treatment and/or treat side > effects without undermining the treatment's function. > Each formula is followed by a discussion of how and why the herbs > are used, including classical Chinese theory and relevant > pharmaceutical studies. > Staging and the age and performance status of various patients is > used as a means by which to explain how formulas are changed. > Case studies explore issues related to the integration of treatment > for each type of cancer. > > For patients ( & practitioners) in the greater NW, she is a resource > worth exploring. > Jason Wright, MS, LAc > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2007 Report Share Posted February 6, 2007 Bob, Feel free to post my name if you wish. But you may want to post criteria for being on the list in the first place. On Feb 6, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Bob Flaws wrote: > Thanks to those who have posted names and locations. Surely there must > be more. Come on out there. > > Bob > > , " wrightatnycc " > <wrightpoint wrote: > > > > I have an addition for the cancer referral list. While at Bastyr in > > the early 90's, I studied with Tai Lahans who has chosen to > > specialize in TCM oncology & management of HIV/AIDS. I believe that > > she is currently teaching the oncology course at the Seattle > > Institute of Oriental Medicine, as well as operating her private > > practice in Seattle, WA (206) 726-0269. She is a knowledgeable & > > caring practitioner. There are several former patients that pop up > > on a google search of Tai's name, all extolling her virtues. I have > > found the information from her classes & writings a tremendous > > resource over the years. > > > > She has an oncology text that has been awaiting publication & can be > > found at Elsevier's website. Book info is: > > Integrating Conventional and in Cancer Care - A > > Clinical Guide > > By Tai Lahans, LAC, MTCM, MEd, Diplomate Chinese Herbal Medicine, > > NCCAOM, White Crane Clinic, Seattle, WA, USA > > Churchill Livingstone Title ISBN: 0443100632 ISBN-13: 9780443100635 > > Expected Release 06/29/2007 > > > > This new clinical resource clearly explains how to approach > > integrated care in a way that combines Chinese herbal medicine with > > Western medicine to enhance and improve medical care for patients > > with cancer – without undermining or negatively impacting patients' > > medical treatment. Each chapter covers a different type of cancer, > > first introducing the conventional medical understanding of that > > cancer including its etiology, diagnosis, and treatment according to > > staging and type. The chapter then covers that cancer from the > > perspective of Oriental medicine. Case studies illustrate the > > integration of treatment for each cancer type, raising important > > issues and considerations associated with specific cancers and > > treatments. > > > > Formulas are presented within the context of conventional treatment, > > intended to enhance the effectiveness of treatment and/or treat side > > effects without undermining the treatment's function. > > Each formula is followed by a discussion of how and why the herbs > > are used, including classical Chinese theory and relevant > > pharmaceutical studies. > > Staging and the age and performance status of various patients is > > used as a means by which to explain how formulas are changed. > > Case studies explore issues related to the integration of treatment > > for each type of cancer. > > > > For patients ( & practitioners) in the greater NW, she is a resource > > worth exploring. > > Jason Wright, MS, LAc > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2007 Report Share Posted February 7, 2007 Bob, thanks again for the posts and getting us moving again. I would suggest any one interested in or who has cancer patients get the book, Restored Harmony: An Evidence Based Approach for Integrating Traditional into Complementary Cancer Care by Stephen Hagar as a consumer level book for cancer patients. I think those of us that have stayed near the schools where we trained would recommend our teachers. Certainly Huabing Wen in my case and as Yehuda would agree, Ji Zhang in Los Angeles are just two more than capable practitioners. As you alluded to, patients often find us rather than us seeking them. Of course, if one is advertising some kind of speciality that has one has little training in then you are being un-ethical if not just dangerous. Most of my cancer patients have come to me because I am me, they were friends or friends of friends or somehow trusted me and wouldn't have gone to someone else. Of course, I always sought out advice from " old doctors " on difficult cases of all stripes. Actually I've had a fair amount of post graduate training including some time in a oncology department in Beijing so I feel I can raise the devils advocate arguement. I would never claim to be a cancer specialist but I am not going to turn away from the challenge. Now hear me out. Do I feel comfortable or capable taking a patient through all the processes? Yes and no. I say that because most of the struggle of the cancer patients that I have seen are being pulled in various directions. I've lost patients in the vital months who have gone for purging - detoxifying in Mexico. Just as the one I saw recently who was being pulled into macrobiotics - (and has resisted it, I've now heard). Perhaps he has been lost to another practitioner who has more enthusiasm for a cure, but in my mind, a lot less knowledge. (Here in LA I can mention one or two supposed cancer specialists who everybody else basically see as frauds.) Those first visits from the patients can set the stage for how the patient can see the possibilities and limitations of the medicine. I've also co-treated with supposed expert Chinese doctors who give up out of fear or lack of knowledge or sensitivity when the decision of surgery has been set. I'm sure it is not the case with our own " expert list " but actually the " integrated " backgrounds are often a detriment for many of our colleagues. Outside of the hospital setting they can get lost. Although we have to be educated and realistic we also have to comprehend what our patients are asking from us. And that often is to work our magic. And part of that magic is to point them in the right direction to the best practitioner but also to guide them through the processes that they might not get from a less trusted practitioner. I think I am saying all of this because although I am glad to see the number of cancer specialists around the country, I don't think we should be saying to less experienced practitioners that they shouldn't see patients who have cancer. Certainly even an experienced veteran like Z'ev sends the patients out to a trusted expert. The less experienced practitioner must know always their own limitations. But none of us should turn away patients and be fearful at confronting the unknown. We should fulfill our basic responsibility to help other people and sometimes that means keeping a patient close and sometimes it means sending them to others. Most often it is a mixture of the two. anyway.... doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2007 Report Share Posted February 7, 2007 Z'ev, Send me your contact info. Bob , " " <zrosenbe wrote: > > Bob, > Feel free to post my name if you wish. But you may want to post > criteria for being on the list in the first place. > > > On Feb 6, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Bob Flaws wrote: > > > Thanks to those who have posted names and locations. Surely there must > > be more. Come on out there. > > > > Bob > > > > , " wrightatnycc " > > <wrightpoint@> wrote: > > > > > > I have an addition for the cancer referral list. While at Bastyr in > > > the early 90's, I studied with Tai Lahans who has chosen to > > > specialize in TCM oncology & management of HIV/AIDS. I believe that > > > she is currently teaching the oncology course at the Seattle > > > Institute of Oriental Medicine, as well as operating her private > > > practice in Seattle, WA (206) 726-0269. She is a knowledgeable & > > > caring practitioner. There are several former patients that pop up > > > on a google search of Tai's name, all extolling her virtues. I have > > > found the information from her classes & writings a tremendous > > > resource over the years. > > > > > > She has an oncology text that has been awaiting publication & can be > > > found at Elsevier's website. Book info is: > > > Integrating Conventional and in Cancer Care - A > > > Clinical Guide > > > By Tai Lahans, LAC, MTCM, MEd, Diplomate Chinese Herbal Medicine, > > > NCCAOM, White Crane Clinic, Seattle, WA, USA > > > Churchill Livingstone Title ISBN: 0443100632 ISBN-13: 9780443100635 > > > Expected Release 06/29/2007 > > > > > > This new clinical resource clearly explains how to approach > > > integrated care in a way that combines Chinese herbal medicine with > > > Western medicine to enhance and improve medical care for patients > > > with cancer – without undermining or negatively impacting patients' > > > medical treatment. Each chapter covers a different type of cancer, > > > first introducing the conventional medical understanding of that > > > cancer including its etiology, diagnosis, and treatment according to > > > staging and type. The chapter then covers that cancer from the > > > perspective of Oriental medicine. Case studies illustrate the > > > integration of treatment for each cancer type, raising important > > > issues and considerations associated with specific cancers and > > > treatments. > > > > > > Formulas are presented within the context of conventional treatment, > > > intended to enhance the effectiveness of treatment and/or treat side > > > effects without undermining the treatment's function. > > > Each formula is followed by a discussion of how and why the herbs > > > are used, including classical Chinese theory and relevant > > > pharmaceutical studies. > > > Staging and the age and performance status of various patients is > > > used as a means by which to explain how formulas are changed. > > > Case studies explore issues related to the integration of treatment > > > for each type of cancer. > > > > > > For patients ( & practitioners) in the greater NW, she is a resource > > > worth exploring. > > > Jason Wright, MS, LAc > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2007 Report Share Posted February 7, 2007 Doug, Can you send me the contact information for the Chinese doctors you mentioned? I'd like this list to be a s user-friendly as possible. Bob , " " wrote: > > Bob, thanks again for the posts and getting us moving again. > > I would suggest any one interested in or who has cancer patients get the book, Restored > Harmony: An Evidence Based Approach for Integrating Traditional into > Complementary Cancer Care by Stephen Hagar as a consumer level book for cancer > patients. > > I think those of us that have stayed near the schools where we trained would recommend > our teachers. Certainly Huabing Wen in my case and as Yehuda would agree, Ji Zhang in > Los Angeles are just two more than capable practitioners. > > As you alluded to, patients often find us rather than us seeking them. Of course, if one is > advertising some kind of speciality that has one has little training in then you are being > un-ethical if not just dangerous. Most of my cancer patients have come to me because I > am me, they were friends or friends of friends or somehow trusted me and wouldn't have > gone to someone else. Of course, I always sought out advice from " old doctors " on difficult > cases of all stripes. Actually I've had a fair amount of post graduate training including > some time in a oncology department in Beijing so I feel I can raise the devils advocate > arguement. I would never claim to be a cancer specialist but I am not going to turn away > from the challenge. Now hear me out. > > Do I feel comfortable or capable taking a patient through all the processes? Yes and no. I > say that because most of the struggle of the cancer patients that I have seen are being > pulled in various directions. I've lost patients in the vital months who have gone for > purging - detoxifying in Mexico. Just as the one I saw recently who was being pulled into > macrobiotics - (and has resisted it, I've now heard). > Perhaps he has been lost to another practitioner who has more enthusiasm for a cure, but > in my mind, a lot less knowledge. (Here in LA I can mention one or two supposed cancer > specialists who everybody else basically see as frauds.) Those first visits from the patients > can set the stage for how the patient can see the possibilities and limitations of the > medicine. > > I've also co-treated with supposed expert Chinese doctors who give up out of fear or lack > of knowledge or sensitivity when the decision of surgery has been set. I'm sure it is not the > case with our own " expert list " but actually the " integrated " backgrounds are often a > detriment for many of our colleagues. Outside of the hospital setting they can get lost. > Although we have to be educated and realistic we also have to comprehend what our > patients are asking from us. And that often is to work our magic. And part of that magic is > to point them in the right direction to the best practitioner but also to guide them through > the processes that they might not get from a less trusted practitioner. > > I think I am saying all of this because although I am glad to see the number of cancer > specialists around the country, I don't think we should be saying to less experienced > practitioners that they shouldn't see patients who have cancer. Certainly even an > experienced veteran like Z'ev sends the patients out to a trusted expert. The less > experienced practitioner must know always their own limitations. But none of us should > turn away patients and be fearful at confronting the unknown. We should fulfill our basic > responsibility to help other people and sometimes that means keeping a patient close and > sometimes it means sending them to others. Most often it is a mixture of the two. > > anyway.... > doug > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2007 Report Share Posted February 7, 2007 Z'ev, In terms of criteria for inclusion on this list, I'm comfortable with the opinions and experiences of members of this forum. To try to create something more than that is beyond my limited knowledge. If the group wants to discuss such criteria, that might be useful, but I don't want to be the arbiter. So far, I've included the name of anyone recommended. While that may not be perfect, it's more than we have now. Bob , " " <zrosenbe wrote: > > Bob, > Feel free to post my name if you wish. But you may want to post > criteria for being on the list in the first place. > > > On Feb 6, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Bob Flaws wrote: > > > Thanks to those who have posted names and locations. Surely there must > > be more. Come on out there. > > > > Bob > > > > , " wrightatnycc " > > <wrightpoint@> wrote: > > > > > > I have an addition for the cancer referral list. While at Bastyr in > > > the early 90's, I studied with Tai Lahans who has chosen to > > > specialize in TCM oncology & management of HIV/AIDS. I believe that > > > she is currently teaching the oncology course at the Seattle > > > Institute of Oriental Medicine, as well as operating her private > > > practice in Seattle, WA (206) 726-0269. She is a knowledgeable & > > > caring practitioner. There are several former patients that pop up > > > on a google search of Tai's name, all extolling her virtues. I have > > > found the information from her classes & writings a tremendous > > > resource over the years. > > > > > > She has an oncology text that has been awaiting publication & can be > > > found at Elsevier's website. Book info is: > > > Integrating Conventional and in Cancer Care - A > > > Clinical Guide > > > By Tai Lahans, LAC, MTCM, MEd, Diplomate Chinese Herbal Medicine, > > > NCCAOM, White Crane Clinic, Seattle, WA, USA > > > Churchill Livingstone Title ISBN: 0443100632 ISBN-13: 9780443100635 > > > Expected Release 06/29/2007 > > > > > > This new clinical resource clearly explains how to approach > > > integrated care in a way that combines Chinese herbal medicine with > > > Western medicine to enhance and improve medical care for patients > > > with cancer – without undermining or negatively impacting patients' > > > medical treatment. Each chapter covers a different type of cancer, > > > first introducing the conventional medical understanding of that > > > cancer including its etiology, diagnosis, and treatment according to > > > staging and type. The chapter then covers that cancer from the > > > perspective of Oriental medicine. Case studies illustrate the > > > integration of treatment for each cancer type, raising important > > > issues and considerations associated with specific cancers and > > > treatments. > > > > > > Formulas are presented within the context of conventional treatment, > > > intended to enhance the effectiveness of treatment and/or treat side > > > effects without undermining the treatment's function. > > > Each formula is followed by a discussion of how and why the herbs > > > are used, including classical Chinese theory and relevant > > > pharmaceutical studies. > > > Staging and the age and performance status of various patients is > > > used as a means by which to explain how formulas are changed. > > > Case studies explore issues related to the integration of treatment > > > for each type of cancer. > > > > > > For patients ( & practitioners) in the greater NW, she is a resource > > > worth exploring. > > > Jason Wright, MS, LAc > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2007 Report Share Posted February 7, 2007 This Dr. was one of my professors while at FITCM. Ruan Jin Zhao 3100 South Tamiami Trail Sarasota, FL 34239 Phone: 941-365-8008 Fax: 941-954-8888 E-mail: rjzhao I just attended a weekend workshop with him on cancer treatment. The workshop was sponsored by Honso. http://honsousa.com/Prof%20Seminar_Orlando%20workshop%2007.htm Does anyone's malpractice insurance company asks whether you treat cancer patients? Mine does.. Fernando Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2007 Report Share Posted February 7, 2007 My insurance does ask, which is why I commented in an earlier e-mail that I dont' treat cancer head-on. Certainly, I have helped quite a number of cancer patients by either early diagnosis, or helping them coping with chemo/radiation therapies, or paliative care when they are heading to the final days. On a different note, while we are focusing on treatment and practitioner's qualification, I think CM practitioner has a lot to offer in terms of early detection, leading to the early diagnosis of cancer. I think this should be emphasized too. Mike L. fbernall <fbernall wrote: This Dr. was one of my professors while at FITCM. Ruan Jin Zhao 3100 South Tamiami Trail Sarasota, FL 34239 Phone: 941-365-8008 Fax: 941-954-8888 E-mail: rjzhao I just attended a weekend workshop with him on cancer treatment. The workshop was sponsored by Honso. http://honsousa.com/Prof%20Seminar_Orlando%20workshop%2007.htm Does anyone's malpractice insurance company asks whether you treat cancer patients? Mine does.. Fernando Cheap Talk? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2007 Report Share Posted February 7, 2007 One of my professors at AOMA taught a terrific workshop on cancer treatment: Dr. He Yuxin 8303 Shoal Creek Blvd. Austin, TX 78757 512.419.7355 Mike Liaw <mikeliaw wrote: My insurance does ask, which is why I commented in an earlier e-mail that I dont' treat cancer head-on. Certainly, I have helped quite a number of cancer patients by either early diagnosis, or helping them coping with chemo/radiation therapies, or paliative care when they are heading to the final days. On a different note, while we are focusing on treatment and practitioner's qualification, I think CM practitioner has a lot to offer in terms of early detection, leading to the early diagnosis of cancer. I think this should be emphasized too. Mike L. fbernall <fbernall wrote: This Dr. was one of my professors while at FITCM. Ruan Jin Zhao 3100 South Tamiami Trail Sarasota, FL 34239 Phone: 941-365-8008 Fax: 941-954-8888 E-mail: rjzhao I just attended a weekend workshop with him on cancer treatment. The workshop was sponsored by Honso. http://honsousa.com/Prof%20Seminar_Orlando%20workshop%2007.htm Does anyone's malpractice insurance company asks whether you treat cancer patients? Mine does.. Fernando Cheap Talk? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2007 Report Share Posted February 7, 2007 Bob- There is a Dr. Zhengang Guo here in Chicago who is a medical oncologist and a TCM herbalist. His contact info is below. In Chicago: 2131 S. Archer Ave. Suite B Chicago IL 60616 In Westmont: 665 Pasquinelli, Unit 203 Westmont, IL 60559 -Steve On Feb 7, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Bob Flaws wrote: > Doug, > > Can you send me the contact information for the Chinese doctors you > mentioned? I'd like this list to be a s user-friendly as possible. > > Bob > > , " " > wrote: > > > > Bob, thanks again for the posts and getting us moving again. > > > > I would suggest any one interested in or who has cancer patients get > the book, Restored > > Harmony: An Evidence Based Approach for Integrating Traditional > into > > Complementary Cancer Care by Stephen Hagar as a consumer level book > for cancer > > patients. > > > > I think those of us that have stayed near the schools where we > trained would recommend > > our teachers. Certainly Huabing Wen in my case and as Yehuda would > agree, Ji Zhang in > > Los Angeles are just two more than capable practitioners. > > > > As you alluded to, patients often find us rather than us seeking > them. Of course, if one is > > advertising some kind of speciality that has one has little training > in then you are being > > un-ethical if not just dangerous. Most of my cancer patients have > come to me because I > > am me, they were friends or friends of friends or somehow trusted me > and wouldn't have > > gone to someone else. Of course, I always sought out advice from > " old doctors " on difficult > > cases of all stripes. Actually I've had a fair amount of post > graduate training including > > some time in a oncology department in Beijing so I feel I can raise > the devils advocate > > arguement. I would never claim to be a cancer specialist but I am > not going to turn away > > from the challenge. Now hear me out. > > > > Do I feel comfortable or capable taking a patient through all the > processes? Yes and no. I > > say that because most of the struggle of the cancer patients that I > have seen are being > > pulled in various directions. I've lost patients in the vital months > who have gone for > > purging - detoxifying in Mexico. Just as the one I saw recently who > was being pulled into > > macrobiotics - (and has resisted it, I've now heard). > > Perhaps he has been lost to another practitioner who has more > enthusiasm for a cure, but > > in my mind, a lot less knowledge. (Here in LA I can mention one or > two supposed cancer > > specialists who everybody else basically see as frauds.) Those first > visits from the patients > > can set the stage for how the patient can see the possibilities and > limitations of the > > medicine. > > > > I've also co-treated with supposed expert Chinese doctors who give > up out of fear or lack > > of knowledge or sensitivity when the decision of surgery has been > set. I'm sure it is not the > > case with our own " expert list " but actually the " integrated " > backgrounds are often a > > detriment for many of our colleagues. Outside of the hospital > setting they can get lost. > > Although we have to be educated and realistic we also have to > comprehend what our > > patients are asking from us. And that often is to work our magic. > And part of that magic is > > to point them in the right direction to the best practitioner but > also to guide them through > > the processes that they might not get from a less trusted > practitioner. > > > > I think I am saying all of this because although I am glad to see > the number of cancer > > specialists around the country, I don't think we should be saying to > less experienced > > practitioners that they shouldn't see patients who have cancer. > Certainly even an > > experienced veteran like Z'ev sends the patients out to a trusted > expert. The less > > experienced practitioner must know always their own limitations. But > none of us should > > turn away patients and be fearful at confronting the unknown. We > should fulfill our basic > > responsibility to help other people and sometimes that means keeping > a patient close and > > sometimes it means sending them to others. Most often it is a > mixture of the two. > > > > anyway.... > > doug > > > > Stephen Bonzak, L.Ac., Dipl. C.H. sbonzak 773-470-6994 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2007 Report Share Posted February 7, 2007 I wanted to share my experience about using CM for cancer. Recently my wife was dx w/ breast cancer and the tx recommendation was mastectomy. I immediately did an index medicus and found much good research about herbs w/ cancer cytotoxic effects and anti proliferations effects. I also contacted numerous people doing clinical research w/ herbs along w/ several people on the cancer list. Everyone I sp w/ was very clear in stating that CM is not a primary method of tx for cancer. The primary modes remain surgery, chemo and radiation. All of the people I sp w/ who are working w/ oncologist are using herbs to strengthen the qi, blood or immune system prior or post surgery. Primarly b/c they had no postive result using herbs to reduce or elimate tumors. This may be the limitations of our medicine. I think it is good to build a list of professional contacts who are working in this field, however it is also important to recognize what we can and cannot treat. CM remains an adjunct therapy in this context. Warren Cargal > > Stephen Bonzak <stephenbonzak > 2007/02/07 Wed PM 05:39:15 EST > > Re: Re: Cancer Referral List (Was Cancer Herbs) > > Bob- > > There is a Dr. Zhengang Guo here in Chicago who is a medical oncologist > and a TCM herbalist. His contact info is below. > > In Chicago: > > 2131 S. Archer Ave. Suite B > Chicago IL 60616 > > In Westmont: > > 665 Pasquinelli, Unit 203 > Westmont, IL 60559 > > -Steve > > On Feb 7, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Bob Flaws wrote: > > > Doug, > > > > Can you send me the contact information for the Chinese doctors you > > mentioned? I'd like this list to be a s user-friendly as possible. > > > > Bob > > > > , " " > > wrote: > > > > > > Bob, thanks again for the posts and getting us moving again. > > > > > > I would suggest any one interested in or who has cancer patients get > > the book, Restored > > > Harmony: An Evidence Based Approach for Integrating Traditional > > into > > > Complementary Cancer Care by Stephen Hagar as a consumer level book > > for cancer > > > patients. > > > > > > I think those of us that have stayed near the schools where we > > trained would recommend > > > our teachers. Certainly Huabing Wen in my case and as Yehuda would > > agree, Ji Zhang in > > > Los Angeles are just two more than capable practitioners. > > > > > > As you alluded to, patients often find us rather than us seeking > > them. Of course, if one is > > > advertising some kind of speciality that has one has little training > > in then you are being > > > un-ethical if not just dangerous. Most of my cancer patients have > > come to me because I > > > am me, they were friends or friends of friends or somehow trusted me > > and wouldn't have > > > gone to someone else. Of course, I always sought out advice from > > " old doctors " on difficult > > > cases of all stripes. Actually I've had a fair amount of post > > graduate training including > > > some time in a oncology department in Beijing so I feel I can raise > > the devils advocate > > > arguement. I would never claim to be a cancer specialist but I am > > not going to turn away > > > from the challenge. Now hear me out. > > > > > > Do I feel comfortable or capable taking a patient through all the > > processes? Yes and no. I > > > say that because most of the struggle of the cancer patients that I > > have seen are being > > > pulled in various directions. I've lost patients in the vital months > > who have gone for > > > purging - detoxifying in Mexico. Just as the one I saw recently who > > was being pulled into > > > macrobiotics - (and has resisted it, I've now heard). > > > Perhaps he has been lost to another practitioner who has more > > enthusiasm for a cure, but > > > in my mind, a lot less knowledge. (Here in LA I can mention one or > > two supposed cancer > > > specialists who everybody else basically see as frauds.) Those first > > visits from the patients > > > can set the stage for how the patient can see the possibilities and > > limitations of the > > > medicine. > > > > > > I've also co-treated with supposed expert Chinese doctors who give > > up out of fear or lack > > > of knowledge or sensitivity when the decision of surgery has been > > set. I'm sure it is not the > > > case with our own " expert list " but actually the " integrated " > > backgrounds are often a > > > detriment for many of our colleagues. Outside of the hospital > > setting they can get lost. > > > Although we have to be educated and realistic we also have to > > comprehend what our > > > patients are asking from us. And that often is to work our magic. > > And part of that magic is > > > to point them in the right direction to the best practitioner but > > also to guide them through > > > the processes that they might not get from a less trusted > > practitioner. > > > > > > I think I am saying all of this because although I am glad to see > > the number of cancer > > > specialists around the country, I don't think we should be saying to > > less experienced > > > practitioners that they shouldn't see patients who have cancer. > > Certainly even an > > > experienced veteran like Z'ev sends the patients out to a trusted > > expert. The less > > > experienced practitioner must know always their own limitations. But > > none of us should > > > turn away patients and be fearful at confronting the unknown. We > > should fulfill our basic > > > responsibility to help other people and sometimes that means keeping > > a patient close and > > > sometimes it means sending them to others. Most often it is a > > mixture of the two. > > > > > > anyway.... > > > doug > > > > > > > > Stephen Bonzak, L.Ac., Dipl. C.H. > sbonzak > 773-470-6994 > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2007 Report Share Posted February 8, 2007 Warren, sorry to hear about your wife's diagnosis. In response to your post and others I would say that we would be (immoral) fools to suggest to patients that they only do CM. I think everyone is clear about that. We may be an adjunct therapy but I believe we are a vital one. Better than most if not all out there. WM's therapies are not always a cure as we know. We can help them achieve better success. In response to Alon, last time in Beijing I saw patients who had come from all corners of the country to see the proverbial big doctor in the Capital City. These people were not taking CM lightly. They had probably spent everything they had to get there for a few minutes of these doctors time and prescriptions. So I wouldn't be dismissive of what means to the Chinese. What I was told there was that many times, and it is the best to be hoped for, was that when surgery was done the tumor sites were found to be necrotic. I have found that in my limited experience when the patients had aggresively taken herbs and operations were made, the tumors have been smaller than expected. Perhaps that is what meant by knowing what you can treat. We can't promise anything but I still think we achieve results that no other therapy can. And certainly patients with cancer need all the help they can get. doug , <wcargal9 wrote: > > I wanted to share my experience about using CM for cancer. Recently my wife was dx w/ breast cancer and the tx recommendation was mastectomy. I immediately did an index medicus and found much good research about herbs w/ cancer cytotoxic effects and anti proliferations effects. > > I also contacted numerous people doing clinical research w/ herbs along w/ several people on the cancer list. Everyone I sp w/ was very clear in stating that CM is not a primary method of tx for cancer. The primary modes remain surgery, chemo and radiation. All of the people I sp w/ who are working w/ oncologist are using herbs to strengthen the qi, blood or immune system prior or post surgery. Primarly b/c they had no postive result using herbs to reduce or elimate tumors. > > This may be the limitations of our medicine. I think it is good to build a list of professional contacts who are working in this field, however it is also important to recognize what we can and cannot treat. CM remains an adjunct therapy in this context. > > Warren Cargal > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2007 Report Share Posted February 8, 2007 Doug The first pt i have ever treated in privet practice had lymphoma and was told she would die in 6 months. With CM and occasional mild chemo we kept her alive for 10 years. Don't take me wrong, i am not saying there is no place for CM in oncology, rather that in Asia it is secondary to WM - Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:25 AM Re: Cancer Referral List (Was Cancer Herbs) Warren, sorry to hear about your wife's diagnosis. In response to your post and others I would say that we would be (immoral) fools to suggest to patients that they only do CM. I think everyone is clear about that. We may be an adjunct therapy but I believe we are a vital one. Better than most if not all out there. WM's therapies are not always a cure as we know. We can help them achieve better success. In response to Alon, last time in Beijing I saw patients who had come from all corners of the country to see the proverbial big doctor in the Capital City. These people were not taking CM lightly. They had probably spent everything they had to get there for a few minutes of these doctors time and prescriptions. So I wouldn't be dismissive of what means to the Chinese. What I was told there was that many times, and it is the best to be hoped for, was that when surgery was done the tumor sites were found to be necrotic. I have found that in my limited experience when the patients had aggresively taken herbs and operations were made, the tumors have been smaller than expected. Perhaps that is what meant by knowing what you can treat. We can't promise anything but I still think we achieve results that no other therapy can. And certainly patients with cancer need all the help they can get. doug , <wcargal9 wrote: > > I wanted to share my experience about using CM for cancer. Recently my wife was dx w/ breast cancer and the tx recommendation was mastectomy. I immediately did an index medicus and found much good research about herbs w/ cancer cytotoxic effects and anti proliferations effects. > > I also contacted numerous people doing clinical research w/ herbs along w/ several people on the cancer list. Everyone I sp w/ was very clear in stating that CM is not a primary method of tx for cancer. The primary modes remain surgery, chemo and radiation. All of the people I sp w/ who are working w/ oncologist are using herbs to strengthen the qi, blood or immune system prior or post surgery. Primarly b/c they had no postive result using herbs to reduce or elimate tumors. > > This may be the limitations of our medicine. I think it is good to build a list of professional contacts who are working in this field, however it is also important to recognize what we can and cannot treat. CM remains an adjunct therapy in this context. > > Warren Cargal > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 All, So are we finished with our referral list? If so, I can post what I have to date. Hard to believe no one else on this list knows of any practitioners they would refer their cancer patients to. I only have 10 or so names. Bob , " Alon Marcus " <alonmarcus wrote: > > Doug > The first pt i have ever treated in privet practice had lymphoma and was told she would die in 6 months. With CM and occasional mild chemo we kept her alive for 10 years. Don't take me wrong, i am not saying there is no place for CM in oncology, rather that in Asia it is secondary to WM > > > > > > > > - > > > Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:25 AM > Re: Cancer Referral List (Was Cancer Herbs) > > > Warren, sorry to hear about your wife's diagnosis. > In response to your post and others I would say that we would be (immoral) fools to > suggest to patients that they only do CM. I think everyone is clear about that. > We may be an adjunct therapy but I believe we are a vital one. Better than most if not all > out there. WM's therapies are not always a cure as we know. We can help them achieve > better success. > In response to Alon, last time in Beijing I saw patients who had come from all corners of > the country to see the proverbial big doctor in the Capital City. These people were not > taking CM lightly. They had probably spent everything they had to get there for a few > minutes of these doctors time and prescriptions. So I wouldn't be dismissive of what > means to the Chinese. > > What I was told there was that many times, and it is the best to be hoped for, was that > when surgery was done the tumor sites were found to be necrotic. I have found that in my > limited experience when the patients had aggresively taken herbs and operations were > made, the tumors have been smaller than expected. > Perhaps that is what meant by knowing what you can treat. We can't promise anything but > I still think we achieve results that no other therapy can. And certainly patients with cancer > need all the help they can get. > > doug > > , <wcargal9@> wrote: > > > > I wanted to share my experience about using CM for cancer. Recently my wife was dx w/ > breast cancer and the tx recommendation was mastectomy. I immediately did an index > medicus and found much good research about herbs w/ cancer cytotoxic effects and anti > proliferations effects. > > > > I also contacted numerous people doing clinical research w/ herbs along w/ several > people on the cancer list. Everyone I sp w/ was very clear in stating that CM is not a > primary method of tx for cancer. The primary modes remain surgery, chemo and radiation. > All of the people I sp w/ who are working w/ oncologist are using herbs to strengthen the > qi, blood or immune system prior or post surgery. Primarly b/c they had no postive result > using herbs to reduce or elimate tumors. > > > > This may be the limitations of our medicine. I think it is good to build a list of > professional contacts who are working in this field, however it is also important to > recognize what we can and cannot treat. CM remains an adjunct therapy in this context. > > > > Warren Cargal > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 I am going to ask Adam Margolis, who has worked for several years in a cancer hospital in Milwaukee, to contact you with address and details. On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:17 AM, Bob Flaws wrote: > All, > > So are we finished with our referral list? If so, I can post what I > have to date. Hard to believe no one else on this list knows of any > practitioners they would refer their cancer patients to. I only have > 10 or so names. > > Bob > > , " Alon Marcus " > <alonmarcus wrote: > > > > Doug > > The first pt i have ever treated in privet practice had lymphoma and > was told she would die in 6 months. With CM and occasional mild chemo > we kept her alive for 10 years. Don't take me wrong, i am not saying > there is no place for CM in oncology, rather that in Asia it is > secondary to WM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:25 AM > > Re: Cancer Referral List (Was Cancer Herbs) > > > > > > Warren, sorry to hear about your wife's diagnosis. > > In response to your post and others I would say that we would be > (immoral) fools to > > suggest to patients that they only do CM. I think everyone is > clear about that. > > We may be an adjunct therapy but I believe we are a vital one. > Better than most if not all > > out there. WM's therapies are not always a cure as we know. We can > help them achieve > > better success. > > In response to Alon, last time in Beijing I saw patients who had > come from all corners of > > the country to see the proverbial big doctor in the Capital City. > These people were not > > taking CM lightly. They had probably spent everything they had to > get there for a few > > minutes of these doctors time and prescriptions. So I wouldn't be > dismissive of what > > means to the Chinese. > > > > What I was told there was that many times, and it is the best to > be hoped for, was that > > when surgery was done the tumor sites were found to be necrotic. I > have found that in my > > limited experience when the patients had aggresively taken herbs > and operations were > > made, the tumors have been smaller than expected. > > Perhaps that is what meant by knowing what you can treat. We can't > promise anything but > > I still think we achieve results that no other therapy can. And > certainly patients with cancer > > need all the help they can get. > > > > doug > > > > , <wcargal9@> wrote: > > > > > > I wanted to share my experience about using CM for cancer. > Recently my wife was dx w/ > > breast cancer and the tx recommendation was mastectomy. I > immediately did an index > > medicus and found much good research about herbs w/ cancer > cytotoxic effects and anti > > proliferations effects. > > > > > > I also contacted numerous people doing clinical research w/ > herbs along w/ several > > people on the cancer list. Everyone I sp w/ was very clear in > stating that CM is not a > > primary method of tx for cancer. The primary modes remain surgery, > chemo and radiation. > > All of the people I sp w/ who are working w/ oncologist are using > herbs to strengthen the > > qi, blood or immune system prior or post surgery. Primarly b/c > they had no postive result > > using herbs to reduce or elimate tumors. > > > > > > This may be the limitations of our medicine. I think it is good > to build a list of > > professional contacts who are working in this field, however it is > also important to > > recognize what we can and cannot treat. CM remains an adjunct > therapy in this context. > > > > > > Warren Cargal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 Bob, I have referred cancer patients in LA to: Neal Miller, L.Ac 13733 Ventura Blvd Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 (818)789-2468 Yehuda Bob Flaws <pemachophel2001 wrote: All, So are we finished with our referral list? If so, I can post what I have to date. Hard to believe no one else on this list knows of any practitioners they would refer their cancer patients to. I only have 10 or so names. Bob , " Alon Marcus " <alonmarcus wrote: > > Doug > The first pt i have ever treated in privet practice had lymphoma and was told she would die in 6 months. With CM and occasional mild chemo we kept her alive for 10 years. Don't take me wrong, i am not saying there is no place for CM in oncology, rather that in Asia it is secondary to WM > > > > > > > > - > > > Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:25 AM > Re: Cancer Referral List (Was Cancer Herbs) > > > Warren, sorry to hear about your wife's diagnosis. > In response to your post and others I would say that we would be (immoral) fools to > suggest to patients that they only do CM. I think everyone is clear about that. > We may be an adjunct therapy but I believe we are a vital one. Better than most if not all > out there. WM's therapies are not always a cure as we know. We can help them achieve > better success. > In response to Alon, last time in Beijing I saw patients who had come from all corners of > the country to see the proverbial big doctor in the Capital City. These people were not > taking CM lightly. They had probably spent everything they had to get there for a few > minutes of these doctors time and prescriptions. So I wouldn't be dismissive of what > means to the Chinese. > > What I was told there was that many times, and it is the best to be hoped for, was that > when surgery was done the tumor sites were found to be necrotic. I have found that in my > limited experience when the patients had aggresively taken herbs and operations were > made, the tumors have been smaller than expected. > Perhaps that is what meant by knowing what you can treat. We can't promise anything but > I still think we achieve results that no other therapy can. And certainly patients with cancer > need all the help they can get. > > doug > > , <wcargal9@> wrote: > > > > I wanted to share my experience about using CM for cancer. Recently my wife was dx w/ > breast cancer and the tx recommendation was mastectomy. I immediately did an index > medicus and found much good research about herbs w/ cancer cytotoxic effects and anti > proliferations effects. > > > > I also contacted numerous people doing clinical research w/ herbs along w/ several > people on the cancer list. Everyone I sp w/ was very clear in stating that CM is not a > primary method of tx for cancer. The primary modes remain surgery, chemo and radiation. > All of the people I sp w/ who are working w/ oncologist are using herbs to strengthen the > qi, blood or immune system prior or post surgery. Primarly b/c they had no postive result > using herbs to reduce or elimate tumors. > > > > This may be the limitations of our medicine. I think it is good to build a list of > professional contacts who are working in this field, however it is also important to > recognize what we can and cannot treat. CM remains an adjunct therapy in this context. > > > > Warren Cargal > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 I'd recommend: Tao Xie, LAc, MD (China) Suite 6-7 299 Newport Avenue Quincy, MA 02170 Phone: 617-479-9001 -Mike > All, > > So are we finished with our referral list? If so, I can post what I > have to date. Hard to believe no one else on this list knows of any > practitioners they would refer their cancer patients to. I only have > 10 or so names. > > Bob > > , " Alon Marcus " > <alonmarcus wrote: >> >> Doug >> The first pt i have ever treated in privet practice had lymphoma and > was told she would die in 6 months. With CM and occasional mild chemo > we kept her alive for 10 years. Don't take me wrong, i am not saying > there is no place for CM in oncology, rather that in Asia it is > secondary to WM >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> >> Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:25 AM >> Re: Cancer Referral List (Was Cancer Herbs) >> >> >> Warren, sorry to hear about your wife's diagnosis. >> In response to your post and others I would say that we would be > (immoral) fools to >> suggest to patients that they only do CM. I think everyone is > clear about that. >> We may be an adjunct therapy but I believe we are a vital one. > Better than most if not all >> out there. WM's therapies are not always a cure as we know. We can > help them achieve >> better success. >> In response to Alon, last time in Beijing I saw patients who had > come from all corners of >> the country to see the proverbial big doctor in the Capital City. > These people were not >> taking CM lightly. They had probably spent everything they had to > get there for a few >> minutes of these doctors time and prescriptions. So I wouldn't be > dismissive of what >> means to the Chinese. >> >> What I was told there was that many times, and it is the best to > be hoped for, was that >> when surgery was done the tumor sites were found to be necrotic. I > have found that in my >> limited experience when the patients had aggresively taken herbs > and operations were >> made, the tumors have been smaller than expected. >> Perhaps that is what meant by knowing what you can treat. We can't > promise anything but >> I still think we achieve results that no other therapy can. And > certainly patients with cancer >> need all the help they can get. >> >> doug >> >> , <wcargal9@> wrote: >> > >> > I wanted to share my experience about using CM for cancer. > Recently my wife was dx w/ >> breast cancer and the tx recommendation was mastectomy. I > immediately did an index >> medicus and found much good research about herbs w/ cancer > cytotoxic effects and anti >> proliferations effects. >> > >> > I also contacted numerous people doing clinical research w/ > herbs along w/ several >> people on the cancer list. Everyone I sp w/ was very clear in > stating that CM is not a >> primary method of tx for cancer. The primary modes remain surgery, > chemo and radiation. >> All of the people I sp w/ who are working w/ oncologist are using > herbs to strengthen the >> qi, blood or immune system prior or post surgery. Primarly b/c > they had no postive result >> using herbs to reduce or elimate tumors. >> > >> > This may be the limitations of our medicine. I think it is good > to build a list of >> professional contacts who are working in this field, however it is > also important to >> recognize what we can and cannot treat. CM remains an adjunct > therapy in this context. >> > >> > Warren Cargal >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 Jason, thanks for adding Tai's name. as i reviewing this thread, i realized her name wasn't here. she was one of my instructors at bastyr, just after you were there. her name is a worthy addition to this referral list. Lynn wrightatnycc <wrightpoint Monday, February 5, 2007 11:53:52 AM Re: Cancer Referral List (Was Cancer Herbs) I have an addition for the cancer referral list. While at Bastyr in the early 90's, I studied with Tai Lahans who has chosen to specialize in TCM oncology & management of HIV/AIDS. I believe that she is currently teaching the oncology course at the Seattle Institute of Oriental Medicine, as well as operating her private practice in Seattle, WA (206) 726-0269. She is a knowledgeable & caring practitioner. There are several former patients that pop up on a google search of Tai's name, all extolling her virtues. I have found the information from her classes & writings a tremendous resource over the years. She has an oncology text that has been awaiting publication & can be found at Elsevier's website. Book info is: Integrating Conventional and in Cancer Care - A Clinical Guide By Tai Lahans, LAC, MTCM, MEd, Diplomate Chinese Herbal Medicine, NCCAOM, White Crane Clinic, Seattle, WA, USA Churchill Livingstone Title ISBN: 0443100632 ISBN-13: 9780443100635 Expected Release 06/29/2007 This new clinical resource clearly explains how to approach integrated care in a way that combines Chinese herbal medicine with Western medicine to enhance and improve medical care for patients with cancer – without undermining or negatively impacting patients' medical treatment. Each chapter covers a different type of cancer, first introducing the conventional medical understanding of that cancer including its etiology, diagnosis, and treatment according to staging and type. The chapter then covers that cancer from the perspective of Oriental medicine. Case studies illustrate the integration of treatment for each cancer type, raising important issues and considerations associated with specific cancers and treatments. Formulas are presented within the context of conventional treatment, intended to enhance the effectiveness of treatment and/or treat side effects without undermining the treatment's function. Each formula is followed by a discussion of how and why the herbs are used, including classical Chinese theory and relevant pharmaceutical studies. Staging and the age and performance status of various patients is used as a means by which to explain how formulas are changed. Case studies explore issues related to the integration of treatment for each type of cancer. For patients ( & practitioners) in the greater NW, she is a resource worth exploring. Jason Wright, MS, LAc ______________________________\ ____ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by " Green Rating " at Autos' Green Center. http://autos./green_center/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2007 Report Share Posted February 10, 2007 I'm surprised no one has mentioned Weidong Lu at NESA. I couldn't find his contact info though. Maybe someone else knows it. ~Jason Weidong Lu , MB, MPH, LicAc: Chair, Chinese Herbal Medicine Department, Research Faculty Dr. Lu is a research faculty member at NESA, chairman of NESA's Chinese Herbal Medicine Department, and a researcher and staff acupuncturist at Dana Farber Cancer Institute's Zakim Center. Dr. Lu received his medical degree (MB) from Zhejiang College of Traditional in 1983 and his MPH from the Harvard School of Public Health. As part of the NESA Acupuncture Research Collaborative, he is a co-leader on the clinical trial entitled TCM Acupuncture for Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia. He is also co-investigator of a NIH-funded trial evaluating the effects of acupuncture on quality of life in late-stage cancer patients, and has served as a consultant to Harvard Medical School 's Osher Institute for numerous studies. NIH Biosketch. , " Bob Flaws " <pemachophel2001 wrote: > > All, > > So are we finished with our referral list? If so, I can post what I > have to date. Hard to believe no one else on this list knows of any > practitioners they would refer their cancer patients to. I only have > 10 or so names. > > Bob > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2007 Report Share Posted February 11, 2007 I believe he still works out of the NESA clinic, New England School of Acupuncture Clinic 124 Watertown Street, Watertown MA 02472 617-926-4271 Par - jasonnesa Saturday, February 10, 2007 7:20 PM Re: Cancer Referral List (Was Cancer Herbs) I'm surprised no one has mentioned Weidong Lu at NESA. I couldn't find his contact info though. Maybe someone else knows it. ~Jason Weidong Lu , MB, MPH, LicAc: Chair, Chinese Herbal Medicine Department, Research Faculty Dr. Lu is a research faculty member at NESA, chairman of NESA's Chinese Herbal Medicine Department, and a researcher and staff acupuncturist at Dana Farber Cancer Institute's Zakim Center. Dr. Lu received his medical degree (MB) from Zhejiang College of Traditional in 1983 and his MPH from the Harvard School of Public Health. As part of the NESA Acupuncture Research Collaborative, he is a co-leader on the clinical trial entitled TCM Acupuncture for Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia. He is also co-investigator of a NIH-funded trial evaluating the effects of acupuncture on quality of life in late-stage cancer patients, and has served as a consultant to Harvard Medical School 's Osher Institute for numerous studies. NIH Biosketch. , " Bob Flaws " <pemachophel2001 wrote: > > All, > > So are we finished with our referral list? If so, I can post what I > have to date. Hard to believe no one else on this list knows of any > practitioners they would refer their cancer patients to. I only have > 10 or so names. > > Bob > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2007 Report Share Posted February 11, 2007 This is Dr. Wen's info. Yehudo, do you have Dr. Zhang's info? Huabing Wen Acupuncturist Office 441 S Beverly Drive Suite 8 Beverly Hills, California 90212 Contact Information phone: (310) 360-7556 fax: (310) 360-7560 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2007 Report Share Posted February 11, 2007 Dr. Ji Zhang 2035 Westwood Blvd. Suite #209. (626)422-7323 jiacupuncture or jiherbs wrote: This is Dr. Wen's info. Yehudo, do you have Dr. Zhang's info? Huabing Wen Acupuncturist Office 441 S Beverly Drive Suite 8 Beverly Hills, California 90212 Contact Information phone: (310) 360-7556 fax: (310) 360-7560 http://traditionaljewishmedicine.com/ Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.