Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Granule dosage question

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I'd be interested in hearing more experiences between the use of

granules and teas. For instance the upper dosage of Minor Bupleurum in

him Che Yeung comes to about 72 to 80 grams a day -- depending on how

many grams of jujube dates one uses. Using a 5 to 1 dry extract

granule preparation this would mean that a patient take about 16 grams

of granules each day, divided into two or three doses.

 

Sorry but I haven't measured out the weight amount of a teaspoon of

granules but this formula only involves 7 herbs. Compare this to a

total of 141 grams for tian wang bu xin dan which would mean that in

granules a patient would need to take 28 grams a day to equal the raw

herb dose.

 

(of course one would leave out the cinnabar).

 

This is a great difference both in the concentration of herbs taken

and the expense.

 

Now how does this even begin to compare with the dosage of the 8

little pills of the patent tian wang.

 

My general approach is to have a patient take a teaspoon of most

granules two or three times daily, swallowed down with water.

 

Measured by this standard, cancer formulas can aspire to the

gargantuan both in the amount of herbs and grnuales that would be

indicated.

 

I'm forced to consider why I may not always achieve the kind of

metabolic changes reflected in symptomology ad other signs such as

tongue using such low non-standard doses.

 

I then consider the fact that Kanpo uses about a third of the dosage

of TCM formulas and treats the classical formulas almost as if they

were homeopathic versions of the same with wider uses and indications

than TCM.

 

So I'm interested in:

 

1. How does one measure and prepare a TCM herbal formula using granules.

2. Comments about the efficacy of dosage variances between TCM raw

herb, Kanpo and granules.

3. How much of the granules of a specific formula does one need to

prescribe to achieve the results of the TCM formulation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only my

experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a

formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper limit of

my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their stomach

and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell them

that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and generally

they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are less

ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much more

potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind spot,

but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each

dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the concentrations).

So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each patient.

I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages

aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light needling.

It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain that a

formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages.

 

doug

 

 

, " Michael Tierra "

<mtierra wrote:

>

> I'd be interested in hearing more experiences between the use of

> granules and teas. For instance the upper dosage of Minor Bupleurum in

> him Che Yeung comes to about 72 to 80 grams a day -- depending on how

> many grams of jujube dates one uses. Using a 5 to 1 dry extract

> granule preparation this would mean that a patient take about 16 grams

> of granules each day, divided into two or three doses.

>

> Sorry but I haven't measured out the weight amount of a teaspoon of

> granules but this formula only involves 7 herbs. Compare this to a

> total of 141 grams for tian wang bu xin dan which would mean that in

> granules a patient would need to take 28 grams a day to equal the raw

> herb dose.

>

> (of course one would leave out the cinnabar).

>

> This is a great difference both in the concentration of herbs taken

> and the expense.

>

> Now how does this even begin to compare with the dosage of the 8

> little pills of the patent tian wang.

>

> My general approach is to have a patient take a teaspoon of most

> granules two or three times daily, swallowed down with water.

>

> Measured by this standard, cancer formulas can aspire to the

> gargantuan both in the amount of herbs and grnuales that would be

> indicated.

>

> I'm forced to consider why I may not always achieve the kind of

> metabolic changes reflected in symptomology ad other signs such as

> tongue using such low non-standard doses.

>

> I then consider the fact that Kanpo uses about a third of the dosage

> of TCM formulas and treats the classical formulas almost as if they

> were homeopathic versions of the same with wider uses and indications

> than TCM.

>

> So I'm interested in:

>

> 1. How does one measure and prepare a TCM herbal formula using granules.

> 2. Comments about the efficacy of dosage variances between TCM raw

> herb, Kanpo and granules.

> 3. How much of the granules of a specific formula does one need to

> prescribe to achieve the results of the TCM formulation.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Agreed.

 

 

 

-Jason

 

 

 

_____

 

 

On Behalf Of

but I'd still maintain that a

formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' -- I've seen it

a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind up pushing

a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and hoping that

i'm not causing further imbalance.

 

What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many formulas but

masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still use a lot of

different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master level yet (in

fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying.

 

Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a few for most

of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The way I see

it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San, Da cheng qi

tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for treatment and it

is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency that comes

before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of treatment of the

practitioner.

 

We must each strive for the highest but at the same time recognize that

those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we

don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like how power

hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often struck

out.

 

So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing to settle

for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't quite make

sense to me -- but oh well.

 

As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with more

complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules tailored to

their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use Western herbs

and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting like

sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery seed,

althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I might give

them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle. Everyone gets

triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can ask me about

those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash the 'all

purpose' Ayurvedic tonic.

 

So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others dispense

herbs.

 

 

_____

 

 

On Behalf Of

Tuesday, April 03, 2007 5:29 PM

 

Re: Granule dosage question

 

 

 

Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only my

experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a

formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper limit of

my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their stomach

and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell them

that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and generally

they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are less

ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much more

potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind spot,

but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each

dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the concentrations)-.

So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each patient.

I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages

aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light needling.

It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain that a

formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages.

 

doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we

don't get to hear the compromises and failures.

>>>>

How true

 

I use powders as though they are bulk herbs. I try to recreate the formula i

would use if it was balk both the number and dosage of herbs. So if i treat a CA

pt that needs lots of herbs at high dose i often endup having them take 30g per

day. I have done so for a long time. Since i have never had any instruction on

using extract powders (as a separate idea) i just switched from bulk and

continued my practice style. It does not make sense to me to think of powders

differently than bulk. The only caveat is that minerals needs to be thought of

as powder (ie not extracts).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

Michael Tierra

Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:18 PM

RE: Re: Granule dosage question

 

 

The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' -- I've seen it

a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind up pushing

a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and hoping that

i'm not causing further imbalance.

 

What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many formulas but

masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still use a lot of

different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master level yet (in

fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying.

 

Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a few for most

of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The way I see

it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San, Da cheng qi

tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for treatment and it

is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency that comes

before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of treatment of the

practitioner.

 

We must each strive for the highest but at the same time recognize that

those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we

don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like how power

hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often struck

out.

 

So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing to settle

for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't quite make

sense to me -- but oh well.

 

As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with more

complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules tailored to

their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use Western herbs

and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting like

sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery seed,

althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I might give

them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle. Everyone gets

triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can ask me about

those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash the 'all

purpose' Ayurvedic tonic.

 

So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others dispense

herbs.

 

 

_____

 

On Behalf Of

Tuesday, April 03, 2007 5:29 PM

Re: Granule dosage question

 

Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only my

experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a

formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper limit of

my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their stomach

and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell them

that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and generally

they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are less

ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much more

potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind spot,

but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each

dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the concentrations)-.

So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each patient.

I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages

aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light needling.

It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain that a

formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages.

 

doug

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Why do you use guggul on everyone past 50? Do you use standardized extract?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

Michael Tierra

Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:18 PM

RE: Re: Granule dosage question

 

 

The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' -- I've seen it

a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind up pushing

a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and hoping that

i'm not causing further imbalance.

 

What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many formulas but

masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still use a lot of

different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master level yet (in

fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying.

 

Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a few for most

of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The way I see

it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San, Da cheng qi

tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for treatment and it

is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency that comes

before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of treatment of the

practitioner.

 

We must each strive for the highest but at the same time recognize that

those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we

don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like how power

hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often struck

out.

 

So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing to settle

for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't quite make

sense to me -- but oh well.

 

As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with more

complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules tailored to

their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use Western herbs

and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting like

sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery seed,

althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I might give

them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle. Everyone gets

triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can ask me about

those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash the 'all

purpose' Ayurvedic tonic.

 

So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others dispense

herbs.

 

 

_____

 

On Behalf Of

Tuesday, April 03, 2007 5:29 PM

Re: Granule dosage question

 

Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only my

experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a

formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper limit of

my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their stomach

and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell them

that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and generally

they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are less

ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much more

potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind spot,

but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each

dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the concentrations)-.

So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each patient.

I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages

aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light needling.

It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain that a

formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages.

 

doug

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I had a perfect formula once. It worked great. Unfortunately, it lost

its power as it stopped working on all patients after that. ;-)

Micheal, good to hear your thoughts.

 

folks, I had some patient cancellations so I'm taking a last minute 24

hour vacation without computer power. Any posts on approval won't come

around for a day or so. The rest of you, behave yourself, I expect to

see this tongue thing worked out by the time I get back.....

love,

doug

 

 

, " Michael Tierra "

<mtierra wrote:

>

> The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' -- I've

seen it

> a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind up

pushing

> a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and

hoping that

> i'm not causing further imbalance.

>

> What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many

formulas but

> masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still use

a lot of

> different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master level

yet (in

> fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying.

>

> Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a few

for most

> of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The

way I see

> it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San, Da

cheng qi

> tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for

treatment and it

> is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency that

comes

> before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of treatment

of the

> practitioner.

>

> We must each strive for the highest but at the same time recognize that

> those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme and

no, we

> don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like how

power

> hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often struck

> out.

>

> So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing to

settle

> for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't

quite make

> sense to me -- but oh well.

>

> As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with more

> complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules

tailored to

> their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use

Western herbs

> and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting like

> sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery seed,

> althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I

might give

> them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle.

Everyone gets

> triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can ask

me about

> those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash the 'all

> purpose' Ayurvedic tonic.

>

> So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others dispense

> herbs.

>

>

> _____

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I use a form called " full spectrum' " which is a combination of standardized

extract with whole herb -- thus one gets the best of both worlds so to

speak.

 

_____

 

 

On Behalf Of Alon Marcus

Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:29 PM

 

Re: Re: Granule dosage question

 

 

 

Why do you use guggul on everyone past 50? Do you use standardized extract?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

Michael Tierra

Wednesday, April 04, 2007 10:32 AM

RE: Re: Granule dosage question

 

 

I use a form called " full spectrum' " which is a combination of standardized

extract with whole herb -- thus one gets the best of both worlds so to

speak.

 

_____

 

On Behalf Of Alon Marcus

Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:29 PM

Re: Re: Granule dosage question

 

Why do you use guggul on everyone past 50? Do you use standardized extract?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Alon,

 

I was wondering if you have had any difficulties with CA patients,

who are also undergoing chemo/ rad therapy, tolerating such a high

dose of herbals? I've been reluctant to prescribe anything higher

than 15-20g per day due to the obvious G.I. problems these patients

have, not to mention the complications of getting herbals through a

stomach port.

 

Best Regards,

 

Jan van Es

 

, " Alon Marcus "

<alonmarcus wrote:

>

> Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we

> don't get to hear the compromises and failures.

> >>>>

> How true

>

> I use powders as though they are bulk herbs. I try to recreate the

formula i would use if it was balk both the number and dosage of

herbs. So if i treat a CA pt that needs lots of herbs at high dose i

often endup having them take 30g per day. I have done so for a long

time. Since i have never had any instruction on using extract powders

(as a separate idea) i just switched from bulk and continued my

practice style. It does not make sense to me to think of powders

differently than bulk. The only caveat is that minerals needs to be

thought of as powder (ie not extracts).

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> -

> Michael Tierra

>

> Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:18 PM

> RE: Re: Granule dosage question

>

>

> The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' --

I've seen it

> a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind

up pushing

> a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and

hoping that

> i'm not causing further imbalance.

>

> What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many

formulas but

> masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still

use a lot of

> different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master

level yet (in

> fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying.

>

> Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a

few for most

> of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The

way I see

> it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San,

Da cheng qi

> tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for

treatment and it

> is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency

that comes

> before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of

treatment of the

> practitioner.

>

> We must each strive for the highest but at the same time

recognize that

> those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme

and no, we

> don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like

how power

> hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often

struck

> out.

>

> So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing

to settle

> for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't

quite make

> sense to me -- but oh well.

>

> As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with

more

> complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules

tailored to

> their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use

Western herbs

> and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting

like

> sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery

seed,

> althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I

might give

> them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle.

Everyone gets

> triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can

ask me about

> those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash

the 'all

> purpose' Ayurvedic tonic.

>

> So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others

dispense

> herbs.

>

>

> _____

>

>

> On Behalf Of Douglas

 

> Tuesday, April 03, 2007 5:29 PM

>

> Re: Granule dosage question

>

> Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only

my

> experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a

> formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper

limit of

> my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their

stomach

> and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell

them

> that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and

generally

> they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are

less

> ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much

more

> potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind

spot,

> but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each

> dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the

concentrations)-.

> So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each

patient.

> I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages

> aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light

needling.

> It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain

that a

> formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages.

>

> doug

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Jan van Es

No i have not, most of the time. In such cases you can have them take it in 4-6

doses per day. The problem is usually taste so i tell them they can do it with

juice or apple sauce.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

J. van Es

Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:21 AM

Re: Granule dosage question

 

 

Alon,

 

I was wondering if you have had any difficulties with CA patients,

who are also undergoing chemo/ rad therapy, tolerating such a high

dose of herbals? I've been reluctant to prescribe anything higher

than 15-20g per day due to the obvious G.I. problems these patients

have, not to mention the complications of getting herbals through a

stomach port.

 

Best Regards,

 

Jan van Es

 

, " Alon Marcus "

<alonmarcus wrote:

>

> Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we

> don't get to hear the compromises and failures.

> >>>>

> How true

>

> I use powders as though they are bulk herbs. I try to recreate the

formula i would use if it was balk both the number and dosage of

herbs. So if i treat a CA pt that needs lots of herbs at high dose i

often endup having them take 30g per day. I have done so for a long

time. Since i have never had any instruction on using extract powders

(as a separate idea) i just switched from bulk and continued my

practice style. It does not make sense to me to think of powders

differently than bulk. The only caveat is that minerals needs to be

thought of as powder (ie not extracts).

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> -

> Michael Tierra

>

> Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:18 PM

> RE: Re: Granule dosage question

>

>

> The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' --

I've seen it

> a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind

up pushing

> a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and

hoping that

> i'm not causing further imbalance.

>

> What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many

formulas but

> masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still

use a lot of

> different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master

level yet (in

> fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying.

>

> Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a

few for most

> of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The

way I see

> it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San,

Da cheng qi

> tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for

treatment and it

> is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency

that comes

> before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of

treatment of the

> practitioner.

>

> We must each strive for the highest but at the same time

recognize that

> those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme

and no, we

> don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like

how power

> hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often

struck

> out.

>

> So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing

to settle

> for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't

quite make

> sense to me -- but oh well.

>

> As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with

more

> complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules

tailored to

> their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use

Western herbs

> and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting

like

> sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery

seed,

> althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I

might give

> them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle.

Everyone gets

> triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can

ask me about

> those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash

the 'all

> purpose' Ayurvedic tonic.

>

> So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others

dispense

> herbs.

>

>

> _____

>

>

> On Behalf Of Douglas

> Tuesday, April 03, 2007 5:29 PM

>

> Re: Granule dosage question

>

> Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only

my

> experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a

> formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper

limit of

> my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their

stomach

> and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell

them

> that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and

generally

> they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are

less

> ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much

more

> potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind

spot,

> but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each

> dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the

concentrations)-.

> So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each

patient.

> I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages

> aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light

needling.

> It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain

that a

> formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages.

>

> doug

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...