Guest guest Posted April 3, 2007 Report Share Posted April 3, 2007 I'd be interested in hearing more experiences between the use of granules and teas. For instance the upper dosage of Minor Bupleurum in him Che Yeung comes to about 72 to 80 grams a day -- depending on how many grams of jujube dates one uses. Using a 5 to 1 dry extract granule preparation this would mean that a patient take about 16 grams of granules each day, divided into two or three doses. Sorry but I haven't measured out the weight amount of a teaspoon of granules but this formula only involves 7 herbs. Compare this to a total of 141 grams for tian wang bu xin dan which would mean that in granules a patient would need to take 28 grams a day to equal the raw herb dose. (of course one would leave out the cinnabar). This is a great difference both in the concentration of herbs taken and the expense. Now how does this even begin to compare with the dosage of the 8 little pills of the patent tian wang. My general approach is to have a patient take a teaspoon of most granules two or three times daily, swallowed down with water. Measured by this standard, cancer formulas can aspire to the gargantuan both in the amount of herbs and grnuales that would be indicated. I'm forced to consider why I may not always achieve the kind of metabolic changes reflected in symptomology ad other signs such as tongue using such low non-standard doses. I then consider the fact that Kanpo uses about a third of the dosage of TCM formulas and treats the classical formulas almost as if they were homeopathic versions of the same with wider uses and indications than TCM. So I'm interested in: 1. How does one measure and prepare a TCM herbal formula using granules. 2. Comments about the efficacy of dosage variances between TCM raw herb, Kanpo and granules. 3. How much of the granules of a specific formula does one need to prescribe to achieve the results of the TCM formulation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2007 Report Share Posted April 3, 2007 Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only my experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper limit of my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their stomach and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell them that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and generally they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are less ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much more potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind spot, but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the concentrations). So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each patient. I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light needling. It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain that a formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages. doug , " Michael Tierra " <mtierra wrote: > > I'd be interested in hearing more experiences between the use of > granules and teas. For instance the upper dosage of Minor Bupleurum in > him Che Yeung comes to about 72 to 80 grams a day -- depending on how > many grams of jujube dates one uses. Using a 5 to 1 dry extract > granule preparation this would mean that a patient take about 16 grams > of granules each day, divided into two or three doses. > > Sorry but I haven't measured out the weight amount of a teaspoon of > granules but this formula only involves 7 herbs. Compare this to a > total of 141 grams for tian wang bu xin dan which would mean that in > granules a patient would need to take 28 grams a day to equal the raw > herb dose. > > (of course one would leave out the cinnabar). > > This is a great difference both in the concentration of herbs taken > and the expense. > > Now how does this even begin to compare with the dosage of the 8 > little pills of the patent tian wang. > > My general approach is to have a patient take a teaspoon of most > granules two or three times daily, swallowed down with water. > > Measured by this standard, cancer formulas can aspire to the > gargantuan both in the amount of herbs and grnuales that would be > indicated. > > I'm forced to consider why I may not always achieve the kind of > metabolic changes reflected in symptomology ad other signs such as > tongue using such low non-standard doses. > > I then consider the fact that Kanpo uses about a third of the dosage > of TCM formulas and treats the classical formulas almost as if they > were homeopathic versions of the same with wider uses and indications > than TCM. > > So I'm interested in: > > 1. How does one measure and prepare a TCM herbal formula using granules. > 2. Comments about the efficacy of dosage variances between TCM raw > herb, Kanpo and granules. > 3. How much of the granules of a specific formula does one need to > prescribe to achieve the results of the TCM formulation. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2007 Report Share Posted April 3, 2007 Agreed. -Jason _____ On Behalf Of but I'd still maintain that a formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2007 Report Share Posted April 3, 2007 The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' -- I've seen it a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind up pushing a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and hoping that i'm not causing further imbalance. What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many formulas but masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still use a lot of different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master level yet (in fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying. Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a few for most of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The way I see it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San, Da cheng qi tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for treatment and it is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency that comes before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of treatment of the practitioner. We must each strive for the highest but at the same time recognize that those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like how power hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often struck out. So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing to settle for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't quite make sense to me -- but oh well. As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with more complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules tailored to their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use Western herbs and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting like sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery seed, althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I might give them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle. Everyone gets triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can ask me about those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash the 'all purpose' Ayurvedic tonic. So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others dispense herbs. _____ On Behalf Of Tuesday, April 03, 2007 5:29 PM Re: Granule dosage question Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only my experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper limit of my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their stomach and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell them that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and generally they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are less ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much more potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind spot, but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the concentrations)-. So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each patient. I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light needling. It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain that a formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages. doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2007 Report Share Posted April 3, 2007 Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we don't get to hear the compromises and failures. >>>> How true I use powders as though they are bulk herbs. I try to recreate the formula i would use if it was balk both the number and dosage of herbs. So if i treat a CA pt that needs lots of herbs at high dose i often endup having them take 30g per day. I have done so for a long time. Since i have never had any instruction on using extract powders (as a separate idea) i just switched from bulk and continued my practice style. It does not make sense to me to think of powders differently than bulk. The only caveat is that minerals needs to be thought of as powder (ie not extracts). - Michael Tierra Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:18 PM RE: Re: Granule dosage question The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' -- I've seen it a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind up pushing a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and hoping that i'm not causing further imbalance. What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many formulas but masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still use a lot of different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master level yet (in fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying. Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a few for most of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The way I see it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San, Da cheng qi tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for treatment and it is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency that comes before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of treatment of the practitioner. We must each strive for the highest but at the same time recognize that those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like how power hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often struck out. So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing to settle for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't quite make sense to me -- but oh well. As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with more complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules tailored to their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use Western herbs and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting like sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery seed, althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I might give them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle. Everyone gets triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can ask me about those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash the 'all purpose' Ayurvedic tonic. So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others dispense herbs. _____ On Behalf Of Tuesday, April 03, 2007 5:29 PM Re: Granule dosage question Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only my experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper limit of my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their stomach and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell them that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and generally they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are less ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much more potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind spot, but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the concentrations)-. So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each patient. I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light needling. It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain that a formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages. doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2007 Report Share Posted April 3, 2007 Why do you use guggul on everyone past 50? Do you use standardized extract? - Michael Tierra Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:18 PM RE: Re: Granule dosage question The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' -- I've seen it a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind up pushing a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and hoping that i'm not causing further imbalance. What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many formulas but masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still use a lot of different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master level yet (in fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying. Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a few for most of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The way I see it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San, Da cheng qi tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for treatment and it is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency that comes before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of treatment of the practitioner. We must each strive for the highest but at the same time recognize that those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like how power hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often struck out. So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing to settle for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't quite make sense to me -- but oh well. As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with more complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules tailored to their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use Western herbs and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting like sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery seed, althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I might give them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle. Everyone gets triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can ask me about those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash the 'all purpose' Ayurvedic tonic. So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others dispense herbs. _____ On Behalf Of Tuesday, April 03, 2007 5:29 PM Re: Granule dosage question Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only my experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper limit of my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their stomach and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell them that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and generally they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are less ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much more potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind spot, but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the concentrations)-. So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each patient. I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light needling. It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain that a formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages. doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2007 Report Share Posted April 3, 2007 I had a perfect formula once. It worked great. Unfortunately, it lost its power as it stopped working on all patients after that. ;-) Micheal, good to hear your thoughts. folks, I had some patient cancellations so I'm taking a last minute 24 hour vacation without computer power. Any posts on approval won't come around for a day or so. The rest of you, behave yourself, I expect to see this tongue thing worked out by the time I get back..... love, doug , " Michael Tierra " <mtierra wrote: > > The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' -- I've seen it > a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind up pushing > a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and hoping that > i'm not causing further imbalance. > > What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many formulas but > masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still use a lot of > different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master level yet (in > fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying. > > Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a few for most > of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The way I see > it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San, Da cheng qi > tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for treatment and it > is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency that comes > before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of treatment of the > practitioner. > > We must each strive for the highest but at the same time recognize that > those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we > don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like how power > hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often struck > out. > > So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing to settle > for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't quite make > sense to me -- but oh well. > > As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with more > complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules tailored to > their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use Western herbs > and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting like > sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery seed, > althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I might give > them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle. Everyone gets > triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can ask me about > those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash the 'all > purpose' Ayurvedic tonic. > > So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others dispense > herbs. > > > _____ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2007 Report Share Posted April 4, 2007 I use a form called " full spectrum' " which is a combination of standardized extract with whole herb -- thus one gets the best of both worlds so to speak. _____ On Behalf Of Alon Marcus Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:29 PM Re: Re: Granule dosage question Why do you use guggul on everyone past 50? Do you use standardized extract? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2007 Report Share Posted April 5, 2007 thanks - Michael Tierra Wednesday, April 04, 2007 10:32 AM RE: Re: Granule dosage question I use a form called " full spectrum' " which is a combination of standardized extract with whole herb -- thus one gets the best of both worlds so to speak. _____ On Behalf Of Alon Marcus Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:29 PM Re: Re: Granule dosage question Why do you use guggul on everyone past 50? Do you use standardized extract? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2007 Report Share Posted April 5, 2007 Alon, I was wondering if you have had any difficulties with CA patients, who are also undergoing chemo/ rad therapy, tolerating such a high dose of herbals? I've been reluctant to prescribe anything higher than 15-20g per day due to the obvious G.I. problems these patients have, not to mention the complications of getting herbals through a stomach port. Best Regards, Jan van Es , " Alon Marcus " <alonmarcus wrote: > > Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we > don't get to hear the compromises and failures. > >>>> > How true > > I use powders as though they are bulk herbs. I try to recreate the formula i would use if it was balk both the number and dosage of herbs. So if i treat a CA pt that needs lots of herbs at high dose i often endup having them take 30g per day. I have done so for a long time. Since i have never had any instruction on using extract powders (as a separate idea) i just switched from bulk and continued my practice style. It does not make sense to me to think of powders differently than bulk. The only caveat is that minerals needs to be thought of as powder (ie not extracts). > > > > > > > > > - > Michael Tierra > > Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:18 PM > RE: Re: Granule dosage question > > > The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' -- I've seen it > a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind up pushing > a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and hoping that > i'm not causing further imbalance. > > What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many formulas but > masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still use a lot of > different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master level yet (in > fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying. > > Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a few for most > of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The way I see > it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San, Da cheng qi > tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for treatment and it > is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency that comes > before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of treatment of the > practitioner. > > We must each strive for the highest but at the same time recognize that > those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we > don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like how power > hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often struck > out. > > So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing to settle > for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't quite make > sense to me -- but oh well. > > As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with more > complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules tailored to > their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use Western herbs > and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting like > sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery seed, > althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I might give > them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle. Everyone gets > triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can ask me about > those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash the 'all > purpose' Ayurvedic tonic. > > So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others dispense > herbs. > > > _____ > > > On Behalf Of Douglas > Tuesday, April 03, 2007 5:29 PM > > Re: Granule dosage question > > Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only my > experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a > formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper limit of > my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their stomach > and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell them > that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and generally > they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are less > ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much more > potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind spot, > but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each > dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the concentrations)-. > So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each patient. > I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages > aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light needling. > It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain that a > formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages. > > doug > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2007 Report Share Posted April 5, 2007 Jan van Es No i have not, most of the time. In such cases you can have them take it in 4-6 doses per day. The problem is usually taste so i tell them they can do it with juice or apple sauce. - J. van Es Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:21 AM Re: Granule dosage question Alon, I was wondering if you have had any difficulties with CA patients, who are also undergoing chemo/ rad therapy, tolerating such a high dose of herbals? I've been reluctant to prescribe anything higher than 15-20g per day due to the obvious G.I. problems these patients have, not to mention the complications of getting herbals through a stomach port. Best Regards, Jan van Es , " Alon Marcus " <alonmarcus wrote: > > Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we > don't get to hear the compromises and failures. > >>>> > How true > > I use powders as though they are bulk herbs. I try to recreate the formula i would use if it was balk both the number and dosage of herbs. So if i treat a CA pt that needs lots of herbs at high dose i often endup having them take 30g per day. I have done so for a long time. Since i have never had any instruction on using extract powders (as a separate idea) i just switched from bulk and continued my practice style. It does not make sense to me to think of powders differently than bulk. The only caveat is that minerals needs to be thought of as powder (ie not extracts). > > > > > > > > > - > Michael Tierra > > Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:18 PM > RE: Re: Granule dosage question > > > The search for the ever elusive 'formula right on the mark' -- I've seen it > a few times in my career but I must confess that too often I wind up pushing > a lot of elements in the body just to make a dent in one -- and hoping that > i'm not causing further imbalance. > > What happened to that old saying that students tend to use many formulas but > masters tend to use fewer with appropriate adjustments. I still use a lot of > different formulas so I'm not sure that i've made the master level yet (in > fact, I don't think i have) but after 35 years I'm still trying. > > Chang chung jing used some 120 formulas mostly variations of a few for most > of his cases. Li Dong Yuan used his favorite set of formulas. The way I see > it a master formula such as Bu Zhong, Liu Wei, Xiao Chai Hu San, Da cheng qi > tang, etc represents not only a patient but a strategy for treatment and it > is the strategy of how to treat liver or kidney yin deficiency that comes > before the formula. --- and this is part of the 'style' of treatment of the > practitioner. > > We must each strive for the highest but at the same time recognize that > those masterful case studies of Jiao Shu De represents the creme and no, we > don't get to hear the compromises and failures. Its sort of like how power > hitters in baseball who hit the most homeruns are also most often struck > out. > > So is dosage of granules important? I see that most are willing to settle > for 9 grams of a formula with any number of herbs in it. Doesn't quite make > sense to me -- but oh well. > > As for me, I tend to overlap a lot in my practice. Patients with more > complicated conditions than a cold or flu, often get granules tailored to > their pattern conformation, a more general tea (I like to use Western herbs > and try to choose from those that are not so obnoxious tasting like > sassafras, sarsaparilla, burdock, dandelion, parsley root, celery seed, > althea, etc. easy on the bitter herbs like Oregon grape. Then I might give > them some pills that somewhat embody the treatment principle. Everyone gets > triphala and everyone past the age of 50 gets guggul -- you can ask me about > those if you like. As of late Iike prescribing Chyavanprash the 'all > purpose' Ayurvedic tonic. > > So that's how I do it. I'm always interested to hear how others dispense > herbs. > > > _____ > > > On Behalf Of Douglas > Tuesday, April 03, 2007 5:29 PM > > Re: Granule dosage question > > Good questions... my experience is not really a good answer, only my > experience. So, generally I don't have the patient take more of a > formula when there are more herbs in it. What sets the upper limit of > my dosage is often what the patient can handle, both in their stomach > and the economics. For difficult cases, such as cancer, I tell them > that the raw herbs are the strongest and most flexible and generally > they comply. My hope and justification is that even if there are less > ingredients the synergy of the many makes the formula that much more > potent without the raise in dosage of each herb. It's a blind spot, > but it seems to work and I would go nuts trying to figure out each > dosage per the number of ingredients (not mention the concentrations)-. > So it usually stays at 90 grams of the total weight for each patient. > I wonder about dosage, how much a body can absorb, if big dosages > aren't the equivilant of China style acupuncture vs. light needling. > It may just be a justification, again, but I'd still maintain that a > formula right on the mark doesn't have to require huge dosages. > > doug > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.