Guest guest Posted April 9, 2007 Report Share Posted April 9, 2007 it seems that the only way to avoid posting all the previous material is to hit the " reply via web post " button and delete unnecessary material. is that correct? or is there a more direct way. I receive posts via daily diary, I don't know if that makes a difference. thanks, Phil , " " wrote: > > I want to again tell people this little thing about editing your > posts. A CHA member emailed me seperately about it. It's kind of akin > to littering. > doug > > long signatures or signatures with images take Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2007 Report Share Posted April 9, 2007 No. You can do either a straight reply (from your mail program) OR a reply via web post. Either way, delete the extraneous material. This is especially important if you to a digest. Otherwise, the reply will include the text of up to 25 posts. thanks. -------------- Original message ---------------------- " philcusick " <pkcusick > it seems that the only way to avoid posting all the previous material is to hit > the " reply via > web post " button and delete unnecessary material. > > is that correct? or is there a more direct way. > > I receive posts via daily diary, I don't know if that makes a difference. > > thanks, Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2007 Report Share Posted April 9, 2007 I simply hit " rpely. " Then, in the message space, I block and then delete everything else people have failed to delete previously. Very simple, no problem. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.