Guest guest Posted May 3, 2007 Report Share Posted May 3, 2007 All, This thread came and went while I was working on an article titled " Codex is Coming? " If anyone is still interested, it is located here: http://www.paradigm-pubs.com/blog Bob Felt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 5, 2007 Report Share Posted May 5, 2007 Dear Bob, Thank you for your informative analysis of codex. I would like to apologize for my use of the word " jargon " . I should have realized the negative connotation of the word. However, I meant to indicate the actual definition which is (according to encarta) - " language or terminology used by a particular group, profession, or culture especially when the words and phrases are not understood by other people. " Terminology would have been a better choice of words. Having said that, I still stand by my advice to the TCM profession as a whole regarding the need to educate the public and government entities as to what TCM is and is not. I will grant that there are risks involved in this. The general attitude among the TCM community in the past seems to have been one of, " keep a low profile " . Perhaps this is best when dealing with great powers of regulation, however I cannot help but wonder if we (and our patients) might not be better served by a slightly more pro-active approach regarding the protection of our rights. I applaud your observation of the general political climate in this country and concur.... hence my concern. Having (like many if not most practitioners) pre-occupations with my practice, I admit to being somewhat lax in staying abreast of these sorts of issues. Once informed of the draft guidance issue, and upon reading it, I certainly did become " alarmed " or even (to put it in the vernacular) " freaked out " by what certainly appears to be clear language that could lay the groundwork for future regulations that could have a negative impact on the practice of TCM, particularly the use of herbs. I am reasonably reassured that the draft guidance and codex issue may not be an emergency, however I am not so reassured regarding the FDA proposal on GMP for dietary supplements brought to this forum's attention by David Kailin (digest # 3537). This proposal, if implemented, could have a serious impact on the ability to practice " Traditional " Chinese herbal medicine. I would be very much interested in your assessment of this proposal. I have not had time to read Sen. Kennedy's bill, but I will endeavor to do so. I'm sure I will be utterly " alarmed " by it;) I would like to thank all (especially our patient and hardworking moderator) again for their response to these issues. I would also like to ask Dr. Kailin if he might provide a bit more information on how to respond to the OMB regarding the GMP proposal. Regards, dr.w Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.