Guest guest Posted June 19, 2007 Report Share Posted June 19, 2007 Hi All, Congratulations to David Mayor for a great article " Electroacupuncture: An introduction & its use for peripheral facial paralysis " in Journal of Chinese Medicine, Number 84, June 2007, 52-70). The main points (Pts) mentioned were: (1) PTS ON AFFECTED SIDE OF FACE BL02-Zanzhu GB12-Wangu GB14-Yangbai LI19-Kouheliao LI20-Yingxiang M-HN-6-Yuyao M-HN-9-Taiyang SI18-Quanliao SJ23-Sizhukong ST01-Chengqi ST02-Sibai ST03-Juliao ST04-Dicang ST06-Jiache ST07-Xiaguan Empirical Pt midway between GB14 & SJ23 (2) NEARBY / REGIONAL PTS: GB20-Fengchi SJ17-Yifeng (3) DISTAL PTS ON LIMBS BILATERALLY: GB34-Yanglingquan LI04-Hegu LV03-Taichong SJ05-Waiguan SJ08-Sanyangluo SP06-Sanyinjiao ST36-Zusanli (4) OTHER PTS: Auricular Mouth Pt Pts on contralateral side of face Pts over affected nerve trunk on face Pt-to-Pt needling Here is my edited summary of the section on " Points used to treat facial paralysis " : A TCM APPROACH: Traditionally, Pts are selected according to pattern of differentiation. Ren Xiaoqun, for example, suggests the following Pts: o For Channel Block dt Wind Cold: GB20, LI04 (w moxa); o For Channel Block dt Wind Heat: SJ17, GB34; o For Qi-Xue Stag: SJ05, SJ08, LV03; o For Qi-Xue Xu: ST36, SP06. ANATOMICAL ACUPUNCTURE: Others prefer a Westernised approach (see Table 3 on the website version of this article), one group suggesting that selecting Pts according to the distribution of the main branches of the facial nerve can be effective even w gentle / superficial MA, another author using such Pts for stronger MA w Pt- to-Pt needling in cases of more chronic PFP (ST06 to ST04; an empirical Pt midway between GB14 & SJ23 to ST07; SJ17). A rational Pt selection might include BL02, SJ23, GB14 & Taiyang M-HN-9 for involvement of the first (temporal) branch of the facial nerve, SI18 & ST01 for second (zygomatic) branch involvement & ST04 + ST06 for the third (mandibular) branch. SJ17, located where the facial nerve emerges from within the skull, is an important Pt. There are very few PFP studies comparing the effects of stimulation at acupoints & non-acupoints. In one, EA at Pts over the nerve trunk had a better effect than similar EA at standard acupoints, while in another EA at LI04 & Auricular Mouth Pt gave superior results to MA at nonspecific Pts (hardly a fair comparison). Non-acupoints over the trajectory of the facial nerve were stimulated in one very small uncontrolled LILT study (N = 4). An alternative approach is based more on the muscles involved rather than the nerves (see Table 3). Thus BL02 & GB14 have been recommended for difficulty in frowning, SJ23 & GB14 for difficulty in raising the eyebrow, ST03 & ST04 for an inability to smile, & SJ17, ST04 & ST06 as general Pts. Pt-to- Pt needling from BL02 to Yuyao M-HN-6, + GB14, is another method taught for incomplete eye closure in China. Zheng Qiwei suggested other Pts for EA: Taiyang M-HN-9 & BL02 / ST02 for incomplete eye closure; LI20 & SI18 / ST07 for difficulty sniffing; either ST04 & ST06 / ST07 & ST04 for difficulty in puffing out the cheeks; LI19 & ST04 for deviation of the philtrum. Wong has given a useful account of some nontraditional muscle levator Pts. STAGING TREATMENT: Ren Xiaoqun suggests that during the acute (and resting) stage, only distal & proximal but NOT facial Pts should be utilised (SJ17, GB12, GB20, LV03, LI04, for example). If facial Pts are used at all, only a few should be stimulated (ST07 to Taiyang M-HN-9, ST06 to ST04, for instance). Zheng Qiwei also recommends that not many Pts should be stimulated initially, maybe 2-4 Pts from the affected area. Chen Kezhen, another experienced reviewer, suggests ST04 & ST07, w LI20 & Taiyang M-HN-9 on the affected side + LI04 on the opposite side. Rather than connecting Pts on the face, Li Zhenbo in one case report paired LI04 + ST04 & LI04 + ST06, alternately. Simple combinations of GB14 + LI04, ST02 + ST07 / ST04 + LI04 have been recommended for use w single-output stimulators. THE USE OF DISTAL PTS: Although Wong disparages the use of distal Pts, the authors of one MA study consider that stimulating distally does add to the effect of purely local treatment. When using EA, one advantage of stimulating Pts away from the affected area is of course that there is no risk of inducing contracture / synkinesis in the early stages of PFP. Thus Zheng Qiwei quite happily recommends the early use of EA at LI04 & SJ05 (w bilateral LI04 Pts connected to one output of the EA device & bilateral SJ05 Pts to a separate output). In the clinical studies database there are many reports in which distal Pts on the limbs are used bilaterally in this way, & probably almost as many in which LI04 is used, but only on the healthy side (although in one MA study, bilateral stimulation of hand Pts was found to be more effective than unilateral treatment). For the full text (free), see http://tinyurl.com/2kqea2 Best regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.