Guest guest Posted December 16, 2007 Report Share Posted December 16, 2007 Bill, Z'ev, Alon, et al, Thanks Bill, I have said something that I don't think I have mentioned in this thread, but do make a point of discussing in the my book--I by no means consider what I have written as absolute. In fact, I am quite sure that years down the line I will look at some of it and say to myself, " Wow, I wrote that? " It happens to all authors of original work, why should I be any different. However, if your afraid to step out the door, you'll never get to the store. I didn't start this trend. Michael Tierra did with Planetary Herbology. Peter Holms' work was a weak attempt, but none the less is another work in the right direction, sort of. I don't want to bash Peter's work. The beginning of the first volume is excellent. Then as I was querying publishers Jeremy Ross published his work. I find it to be not at all like what I have done. He, like Holms, has mixed traditions that I feel make it difficult for the Chinese herbalist to use. I initially didn't like it at all, but I have found it to be somewhat useful, but then I have training in Western herbalism. What sets my work apart is that it is the first one to use ONLY Chinese jargon to discribe how the herb works and how you, the Chinese herbalist, can use the herbs. I didn't make up any theory to try to describe what I was seeing, I relied on the theories of Chinese medicine as I understand them. The only place you will find anything that doesn't look like it came out of Bensky (except I use Wiseman/Feng terminology, both for consistancy and ease of reference), or any other Chinese materia medica, is in the commentary where you will find lots of other interesting data culled from lots of sources, including some translation of either the same or related species used in China, some ethnobotany, some anacdotal stuff, etc. Oh, and btw, it has full color photos of the plants throughout, all of which were taken by yours truly, with the exception of two which were taken by Mimi Kamp, an excellent herbalist and talented artist from the Southwest. OK, enough about my book. I will just say, SHAMELESSLY, go buy it (its not like I am really making much money, I am making more money here in Beijing doing " editing, " read as back-translation, for PMPH). I truly believe you will like it. If you don't, I want to hear about it, please. I really mean it, email me, vent on this forum, send me a post card, or hate mail if that's what you think will be effective. I believe this work is very important and I also believe that it is through discussion that it will improve and hopefully relieve some suffering in the process. That is, in the end, my true motivation. Oh, and hey, if you do like it, I wouldn't mind hearing that either, I am a human with an ego that likes to be stroked every now and again :-} May All Beings Find True Happiness! Thomas , " bill_schoenbart " <plantmed2 wrote: > > I think Thomas and Zev are both making valid points. > Adding " Western " herbs to a TCM formula isn't technically pure TCM, > since the Western herbs don't have the same level of testing and > discussion over time. Western herbs that are already incorporated > into TCM have undergone centuries of this sort of testing. On the > other hand, I don't think that should stop us from using Western > herbs along with TCM formulas. I have been doing it for 17 years, > with no adverse effects. It is in fact a form of Jia Jian, which is > an important principle in modifying TCM formulas. I see no problem > in adding Cramp Bark to an Invigorate Blood formula for > dysmenorrhea, for example. It's only one herb, so its energetics are > less important than its action in this case. Or giving Echinacea to > a patient with weak Wei Qi. Clinical studies and personal experience > have shown that it is effective in preventing colds. Does that make > it tonifying? Don't know; don't care. It works. > > Do we know exactly Western herbs will blend with the Chinese herbs? > Not exactly, which is why books like Thomas' are so important. That > sort of text is the BEGINNING of the discussion, not the end of it. > After 100 or so years of testing those herbs in TCM formulas, the > discussion will begin to rise to the level of experience that is > inherent in traditional Chinese herbal medicine. Thomas or his > descendants can edit the info accordingly. The discussion and > exploration has to start sometime; why not now? I'm not suggesting > that people with no experience using Western herbs start randomly > giving them to patients. On the other hand, with some education and > experience, the powerful Qi of organic or wildcrafted local herbs > can greatly enhance the efficacy of a traditional formula. > > - Bill Schoenbart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.