Guest guest Posted January 10, 2008 Report Share Posted January 10, 2008 Yehuda and Jason, points well taken. Eliminates and remove phlegm sounds like they would work. Jason, I agree we need to know what these things do rather than getting hung up on words. However, because we use transform, this question comes up and it takes a discussion like this to resolve, eliminate, vaporize the misconceptions. Hang around the schools and you'll have the same conversation year after year. It takes questions like these to bring it out. I will sadly mourn the loss of vaporize. (TCM taken into the 25th Century) doug , yehuda frischman < wrote: > > Doug, > > I believe you are missing the point. As I mentioned, both the Eastland Press glossary and Wiseman's PD, both use the term " forceful " in their description of what happens to the phlegm in Huo4 Tan1: Bensky chooses the description, " dislodges, forcefully removes, " and Wiseman chooses the description, " forceful elimination of evils such as phlegm. " The common denominator implicit in this term according to both scholars is a forceful action to get rid of phlegm, and where it goes when using the term Huo4, doesn't really matter. Therefore, the descriptions used to theorize where or how phlegm goes when applying the action of Huo4, such as transforming, or dislodging or vaporizing seem IMO, to be based on imagination and don't do justice to accurately connote what IS the relevant quality of the action which is " heroic, " forceful, and reducing. > > Respectfully, > > Yehuda > > wrote: > The problem I have with dislodge is that it suggests that phlegm is a > substance that is moved somewhere else when it is dislodged. It's same > issue as transformed. Transformed into what? > I've never seen phlegm, when properly treated, do anything other > than... well, disappear (vaporize?) > Jason, while we're here, what is the chinese word for scour? > > Doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2008 Report Share Posted January 10, 2008 Good point Doug. I just don't think Buck Rodgers and his 25th Century Phelgm dislodger sounds as cool as the Phlegm Vaporizer. Lucky for us that the same herb vaporizes and dislodges. Amazing! Geoff , " " wrote: >..I will sadly > mourn the loss of vaporize. (TCM taken into the 25th Century) > doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.