Guest guest Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 I have been wondering about this statement for a little while now, and can't remember if it was discussed in the past. I am sure you are talking about many volumes of textbooks, Bob, but I was wondering about the realities of translating and publishing these texts. Since this is the standard, why hasn't anyone taken this on? Daunted by volume, not enough money to be made, too many political and copyright hurdles, and/or failure to agree on terminology? Sean _____ On Behalf Of Bob Flaws Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:44 PM Re: in support of creative thought in Jazz, classical vs improv What students and practitioners have to have " down cold " is all the basic, foundational materials that form the standard TCM curriculum as taught in China. In China, there are definite national standards with right and wrong answers. It is only after one has all this down pat as a basis that then there is room for creative interpretation and new ideas. These standards are reflected in the standard national textbooks of CM published in the PRC and used as required textbooks at virtually all state-run TCM schools and colleges. These textbooks have been created and edited by national committees for exactly the purpose of teaching national standards as a basis. In my experience as a teacher, American students as a whole are far from being clear about and mastering (i.e., memorizing) this basic core curriculum. Further, this material needs to be learned in translationally correct, technically accurate terminology which is transparently correlated to the original Chinese. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.