Guest guest Posted April 11, 2009 Report Share Posted April 11, 2009 Hi Jason Are you familiar with the results of Mazin when treating skin disorders? They are unmatched by anyone in the west. I guess his approach is just one way, but his experience for several decades treating very difficult skin problems must count for something. Without meaning anything personal, is sometimes find you very quick to judge:-). Results must be respected, no matter what treatment style and testing Liv enzymes sounds to my like a caring and safe way for a professional to handle his patients. We should need more of this attitude in Chinese medicine if we want to call ourselves professionals! Just my two cents Best regards Carl Wallmark _____ Från: För Skickat: den 11 april 2009 11:46 Till: Ämne: RE: Dose of herbs prescribed to Westerner in Beijing Daniel, I actually believe the opposite, and would like to see some evidence that larger dosage formulas are the norm for a 'traditional perspective.' I think larger dosage formulas are a more modern approach, many times fueled by pharmacological / Western style research. I cannot speak for Taiwan, for I have only studied their once, but in the mainland there are plenty of famous doctors, actually most of the one's I have studied with, that do not use large dosages. It is also clear that one can get results with serious skin, autoimmune, etc with small concise formulas. THIS is what I see as a traditional approach, hence practiced usually only by the really old doctors, with strong classical training. Actually one just needs to look through case studies and see how small and precise the formulas were by some of the best doctors in history - hence what I call a traditional approach. Of course there are exceptions with doctors using large dosages, but there are plenty of examples of small dosage formulas. Check out Ye Tian-Shi, Ding Gan ren, Qin Bo-wei, Liu Bao-yi, and the meng-he doctors to see this style in real clinical practice. However your definition of traditional might be different than mine. I think of a traditional approach from doctors prior to 'Modern TCM " and who used a traditional approach to diagnosis and based their formulas on classical ideas and prescriptions. Just for the record there is too much debate for the SHL's dosages to weigh in on this topic. I also disagree that 'smaller dosages' has to do with the economic situation of the patient. There are doctors that I study with that just use small dosages because they find no need to blast people out of the water. The get some of the best results around hence are the busiest doctors. These doctors do say that overdosing is an issue and too many herbs can be harmful. I always wonder why one would opt for an approach where one has to constantly monitor Liver enzymes. Of course safe is best if you choose such an approach, but such a strong approach IMHO is just unnecessary. - @ <%40> [@ <%40> ] On Behalf Of Daniel Altschuler Saturday, April 11, 2009 11:37 AM @ <%40> RE: Dose of herbs prescribed to Westerner in Beijing 180 gms is actually quite a moderate dose from a traditional perspective. Dosages in Taiwan tend to average 4 to 6 liang (one bag per day). One liang is, in taiwan, 37.5g. Small dosages on the mainland has a lot to do with the economic situation of the average person than it does with concern for 'overdosing'. In taiwan, many clinics (not herbal shop) have a set price for their formulas--they charge per bag not per gram. So they actually lose money with large prescriptions. Of course, this does not necessarily speak for what happened in Beijing, but there are quite a few well known physicians in China who retain old style treatment methods and use large doses. Daniel Altschuler irus Database: 270.11.48/2048 - Release 04/10/09 18:27:00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.