Guest guest Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Maybe some of these evolving food sensitivities vary according to which genetic construct they get exposed to according to the variety of genetically modified plant they consumed. Here is a link to a list of genetically engineered crops that have been released: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/status/relday.html You can use the " control f " function to search the name of the plant you are interested in (e.g., " corn " , " wheat " , " potato " , etc.) and see the different ways it has been modified. Or just scroll down and try to take it all in. . . Be aware that any type of pest resistance means some toxin has been introduced. And antiobiotic resistance markers are used as a matter of course for identification purposes. It is a matter of great debate to what extent this may allow for horizontal gene transfer within the microflora of the gut. Corn ain't what it used to be, and neither are wheat, tomato, soybean, rice, etc. Corn is a sacred plant. Rice is a sacred plant. They're all sacred. At least they used to be, or should be. That's my belief and I do not apologize for it. regards, Gena Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2009 Report Share Posted August 5, 2009 Since the framework of herbal medicine is based on traditional preparation methods (decoction, drafts, honey pills, alcohol, etc. ) and granulation technology is relatively new, how do we know the additives/fillers aren't changing the energetic actions of the herbs? We know from the classics that there are incompatible and antagonistic combinations. From what I can tell through CHA discussions, pharmaceutical corn starch, dextrin, or potato starch seem to be looked at as energetically benign substances (other than the occasional allergic reaction). I'm not sure if anyone knows the temperatures or organ affinities of these additives, but I believe it adds an extra layer of complexity to our choices. Though granules containing additives are widely used in China and Taiwan, I wonder how practitioners, researchers, and manufacturers incorporate these new substances into the theories of our constantly evolving medicine. -Danny On Aug 3, 2009, at 10:35 AM, wrote: > A patient, actually also my sister (not a good idea, I know, but > that is another story) took some of a Qualiherb formula, and > immediately got a reaction exactly like her soy sensitivity. She can > take other companies without problems, including the same formulas. > Doug > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.