Guest guest Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Bill, Sorry, but you did refer to these articles as 'conspiratorial nonsense'. I don't know you. I can only assume you care deeply about your clients. So when someone such as Mike Adams puts together a set of information that appears to be important for the welfare of our clients and you dismiss it as " conspiratorial nonsense " without actually addressing the issues, then I suspect you are not interested in a 'reasonable debate'. I really don't mean to appear insulting especially to someone whom I do not know. But there is another side to what seems to be a comfortable opinion that big business and monopoly (FDA) is really here to help us - since it is the law. Best wishes and apologies, Douglas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Jason said: Actually any formula...Recommending any one remedy seems contrary to basic Chinese medicine's philosophy. Comments? Stephen: Well said, I couldn't agree more - " any herb is anti-anything-it-needs-to-be when given to the right person, at the right time, in the right amount Stephen Woodley LAc www.shanghanlunseminars.com -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Apology accepted, Doug. Just a misunderstanding. When I said " conspiratorial nonsense " , I was referring to the specific example of his claiming that the FTC was acting on behalf of the vaccine companies. I wasn't referring to the rest of the info in the articles, which I haven't had time to review. I probably should have been more clear about that. - Bill , " Douglas Dailey " <ddailey wrote: > > Bill, > > Sorry, but you did refer to these articles as 'conspiratorial nonsense'. I > don't know you. I can only assume you care deeply about your clients. So > when someone such as Mike Adams puts together a set of information that > appears to be important for the welfare of our clients and you dismiss it as > " conspiratorial nonsense " without actually addressing the issues, then I > suspect you are not interested in a 'reasonable debate'. > > I really don't mean to appear insulting especially to someone whom I do not > know. But there is another side to what seems to be a comfortable opinion > that big business and monopoly (FDA) is really here to help us - since it is > the law. > > Best wishes and apologies, > > Douglas > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.