Lots Institute teachings

[Guest guest]

I wonder why there has been no discussion on this form about the way that the

Taiwanese exponents and teachers associated with Lotus Institute Practice. It

seems to me that it represents a radical departure both in terms of diagnosis

and treatment from ‘standard’ TCM. For one, they espouse the simultaneous

use of several formulas and then the pulse diagnosis based on Jimmy Chang’s by

his own admission retains only about 20% of what is taught and learned in TCM

school. Then they had a teacher teaching TCM Iridology based on the same bogus

and flimsy methodology espoused by Bernard Jensen and Dr. Christopher in the

early 1970’s. The upshot of which is prescribing several formulas

simultaneously even those with opposing properties such as Long Dan with Ba Wei

di huang wan.

 

 

 

I know that are a large number of ‘orthodox’ TCM’ers on this list ( I

respect them but have argued that there are several way to practice TCM) and

I’m wondering what they think about Lotus Institutes way of diagnosis and

treatment.

 

 

 

Michael Tierra