Guest guest Posted September 10, 2004 Report Share Posted September 10, 2004 > a) revulsion to carrion eating, > b) diet/health, > c) religion > d) generalized animal rights, [hence TVP mock-meat products] > e) veggies and soy products just taste better > f) environmental [veggies (vs meat) as food represent more effective > use of land resources] F for me, mostly; I'm in it for human rights, not animal rights. I'm not anti-meat and certainly had no revulsion at eating it; quite the opposite. And though after 10 years away from it the thought of eating beef isn't appealing to me now, I still sometimes miss chicken, turkey and pork, especially when my downstairs neighbors are grilling out and the smell wafts up. Nor do I object morally to killing animals to eat; predator vs. prey is the order of nature, and as I see it, we're part of nature, not separate from it. I do wish we raised and killed our meat animals more humanely, and even when I still ate meat, I didn't eat veal. But the core of it for me is that the West's consumption of meat is simply out of control. The World Health Organization stats I've seen say it takes 15 to 16 pounds of humanly edible grain and soy, 1000 gallons of clean water and the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline to raise one pound of beef to edible age. Multiply that by the average American's annual consumption and it becomes plain staggering. So in a world where around a fifth of the planet's people are clinically malnourished, I find I prefer to stick to the grain and soy without sending it through a cow first. Yes, I know food supply isn't the only issue in world hunger; politics -- and plenty of plain theft by tinpot dictators -- also play a part. But in a hungry world, I found I no longer wanted to hog that many resources just because I had the blessing to be born in a rich country. Is that a religious decision for me as a Wiccan? Yes and no. We don't have a rule about being vegetarian, and a lot of us aren't, but mindfulness of the interdependence of life and care for the rights and welfare of others is certainly part of our faith. And health is certainly a factor for me. My cholesterol levels are great, the muscle ailments I have give me less pain when I don't eat meat, and last but DEFINITELY not least :-), staying away from meat and poultry gave me what has to have been the easiest menopause in the modern history of my family. Mom and her mom and all the aunts and great- aunts went through hell; I pretty much sailed through, and my internist suspects that has at least something to do with not suckin' up all those artificial cowmones every day. And I do love soy. I even bought myself a soymilk maker, which worked great for a few months and died. I want another, but can't afford it. :-/ As a confirmed tofu junkie I tried making my own tofu. It was tasty but came out way too soft, and I want to try again when I'm up to it. Meanwhile I buy the good fresh kind from Asian groceries, or Spring Creek brand (which is wonnnnderful!) at the healthfood store. The Asian markets are cheaper by as much as 50 percent, especially if I buy a case of 12 one-pound packages and freeze most of it; I've gotten a case for as little as $11. Rain ______________ Get your name as your email address. Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2004 Report Share Posted September 10, 2004 > I'm not anti-meat . . . > Nor do I object morally to killing animals to eat; predator vs. prey > is the order of nature, and as I see it, we're part of nature, not > separate from it. I do wish we raised and killed our meat animals > more humanely . . . And that is what many non-vegetarians say to justify their eating meat, isn't it ;=) That argument - even from a vegetarian of ten years' standing - isn't really a good one to use here. Please remember this is a vegetarian list, and whatever *your* reasons for being a vegetarian, there is no reason to argue against other excellent reasons for vegetarianism. What you say about the waste of resources in producing animals for consumption is pertinent, and your reason for being a vegetarian - World Hunger is what I'd call it - is good. It is not so unusual that it needs to be argued among vegetarians. > Yes, I know food supply isn't the only issue in world hunger; politics -- > and plenty of plain theft by tinpot dictators -- also play a part. But > in a hungry world, I found I no longer wanted to hog that many > resources just because I had the blessing to be born in a rich country. With respect, not everyone in America is rich, nor can they all afford a healthy diet - which is why the availability of cheap fast and unhealthy food is so devastating to the health of American people. It is not unknown in Canada either, I hasten to add ;=) But let us not open the door on tinpot dictators etc. - politics has no part on this list, no matter how well intentioned the remarks and how sympathetic some members may be to the position taken or potentially to be taken. So, not just for the person who posted this message to which I respond, but to anyone else about to respond, I suggest that care be taken. By all means respond - this kind of thing is fun and informative ;=) But remember that in answering the original question and opting for one primary reason for your vegetarianism, it is not necessary to debunk other reasons. It's not a contest. All are excellent reasons and we must respect them all. Best, Pat ;=) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.