Guest guest Posted September 15, 2004 Report Share Posted September 15, 2004 Thanks Gina. I'm a budding [pun intended] horticulturist. Jointly conducting a plant tissue culture workshop this weekend at the local college. Okay on the meat question. I don't mean to be too verbose on this topic, I am just trying to nail down my understanding of vegetarianism. So, even if the meat could be produced in-vitro or buy some other process that caused no death or suffering to a sentient beast, it is still NOT kosher for a vegetarian? So is it the biochemical nature of the animal protein that is offensive to vegetarians, or the fact that an animal was sacrificed? Or both? Please be patient with my sophomoric questions as I try to get up to speed in my vegetarian quest. Thanks, Kevin ********** , Gina <webdyke> wrote: > Well....technically it would still be meat, since, well, you had to get the > cells from somewhere... > > Just so you know, I'm a biochemist... > > Gina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2004 Report Share Posted September 18, 2004 In the native belief system, everything has a spirit. I personally could not eat a part of an animal that was made through in vitro, this is just merely another show of greed, the need to create a piece of animal with spirit in the disguise of not being alive to justify to ones self the " need " to eat meat. It is the same to me as using the excuse that it is unhealthy to not eat meat. Merely a quick and easy thing to believe just to make ones concience remain quiet. --- " feline_rancher " <feline_rancher wrote: Thanks Gina. I'm a budding [pun intended] horticulturist. Jointly conducting a plant tissue culture workshop this weekend at the local college. Okay on the meat question. I don't mean to be too verbose on this topic, I am just trying to nail down my understanding of vegetarianism. So, even if the meat could be produced in-vitro or buy some other process that caused no death or suffering to a sentient beast, it is still NOT kosher for a vegetarian? So is it the biochemical nature of the animal protein that is offensive to vegetarians, or the fact that an animal was sacrificed? Or both? Please be patient with my sophomoric questions as I try to get up to speed in my vegetarian quest. Thanks, Kevin ********** , Gina <webdyke> wrote: > Well....technically it would still be meat, since, well, you had to get the > cells from somewhere... > > Just so you know, I'm a biochemist... > > Gina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.