Guest guest Posted October 16, 2002 Report Share Posted October 16, 2002 I respect your choice to vaccinate your child because you believe it is in her best interest. However, there are many parents, scientists, physicians, and other experts who do not believe vaccinations provide sufficient benefit to justify the risks. Like it or not, there IS a legitimate and valid controversy surrounding the issue of vaccinations. You can call all arguments you don't agree with garbage, emotional propaganda, and sensationalism if you wish, but it doesn't change the fact that those arguments are taken very seriously by highly educated and intelligent people who have researched this controversy in depth.  I maintain that all parents need to educate themselves thoroughly about BOTH diseases vaccines are meant to prevent and the vaccines themselves. The difference between propaganda and education is that propaganda tells you what to believe, and education allows you to decide for yourself what to believe.  A true education has got to include inconvenient facts. Otherwise, all we got is mainstream propaganda that " vaccines save lives from terrible fates, and don't you ever question it. "  Why don't you explain exactly what is factually inaccurate, and scientifically incorrect?   First, it is the toxic substances people object to, not things like sodium chloride (salt). So let's limit our discussion to toxic compounds. Which foods contains these toxic substances, for example? I can't think of any food that has formaldehyde or sodium hydroxide, but I am willing to be educated on this. Yes, some (not MANY) foods contain MSG, but a lot of people won't eat foods with MSG either. There is the BIG difference between being exposed to Drano, and injecting even a little bit of it directly into the bloodstream. Perhaps you feel this is acceptable, but others may not. We have a right to discuss these legitimate issues. What may be offensive information to you, might be valuable thought-provoking points for others. I'm not trying to begin an argument, I'm simply attempting to show you where non-vaccinating parents are coming from as well. " Poor animals! How jealously they guard their pathetic bodies…that which to us is merely an evening's meal, but to them is life itself. " ~ T. Casey Brennan Subscribe to my Vegan_Animal_Rights today: Vegan_Animal_Rights/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 , jomanji13@a... wrote: > I respect your choice to vaccinate your child because you believe it is in > her best interest. However, there are many parents, scientists, physicians, > and other experts who do not believe vaccinations provide sufficient benefit > to justify the risks. Like it or not, there IS a legitimate and valid > controversy surrounding the issue of vaccinations. You can call all > arguments you don't agree with garbage, emotional propaganda, and > sensationalism if you wish, but it doesn't change the fact that those > arguments are taken very seriously by highly educated and intelligent people > who have researched this controversy in depth. Hm. I *think* you are talking to me, because I responded and said that I did feel the benefits of vaccination justified the risk, based on some experiences I have had in my own family and elsewhere. Nowhere have I used the terms you quote to describe anybody else's arguments, so I can only conclude that you must be talking to somebody else ... Be well, Hadass in Winnipeg. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.