interesting chart

[Guest guest]

Dear List Members

 

I am enclosing an interesting chart and worksheet. The birth details are

mentioned in the worksheet. Master Krushna has suggested that I put this up

to the list for discussions.

 

Your views are solicited.

 

Regards

Sanjay

 

>

> I am attaching the marriage worksheet of a female. You are requested to

> advise if my calculations are correct.

>

> Ascendant Libra 2:35 in the star Chitra of Mars

> Sun Pisces 23:21 in the star Revati of

Mercury

> Moon Sagittarius 6:24 in the star Mula of Ketu

> Mars Taurus 13:37 in the star Rohini of Moon

> Mercury Pisces 14:27 in the star Uttarabhadrapad of

> Saturn

> Jupiter Sagittarius 15:17 in the star Purvashadha of

Venus

> Venus Taurus 9:06 in the star Krittika of Sun

> Saturn Taurus 10:46 in the star Rohini of Moon

> Rahu Capricorn 9:28 in the star Uttarashadha of Sun

> Ketu Cancer 9:28 in the star Pushya of Saturn

>

> In the worksheet, Saturn is strongest with 19 points, the Venus and

Mercury

> with 17 each, followed by Sun with 13. Jupiter has only 7 points but Moon

> and Mars have negative points.

>

> This is an interesting chart as Moon and Mercury contribute 0 points to

the

> 7th house. Venus, while it has 17 points, is in Krittika, which is very

bad

> for marriage according to your lesson 8. Saturn and Venus both have sights

> on the main Upachay sthans so cannot give the result. Mercury is

debilitated

> in Rashi ( this is a point I request clarification on as it has 6 points

and

> should not be debilitated according to your earlier lessons.)

>

> Mars is samdharmi with Saturn and Venus but I think it cannot give the

> result as it has negative points. Ketu is samdharmi with Saturn and Moon

but

> I think since Moon also has negative points, Ketu will not give the

result.

>

> Rahu is samdharmi with Saturn and Sun, both being significators with over

12

> points. I think Rahu can give the result. It had its subperiod from

January

> 17, 1997 until December 12, 1997. However, there was no result.