Sv: Visti's AV Corrected Version

[Guest guest]

Om Krsna Guru.

Dear Peter.

Please keep the worksheet of topic, on this list, until it is corrected and

complete, as we don't want a worksheet full of errors floating about making

people confused now.

 

For those who don't know abou this, Sanjay, Donna, Sandy, Peter and I are

working on adding Krushna's worksheet to the calculation process, of Sanjays AV

worksheet.

 

Peter, i just sent u a new worksheet. And not that the lagna must be set and

left as 1, and the rest of the planets must also be entered as house placement,

and not sign placement. By the way its my chart in the basic's section, so it

won't add up with the past examples offcourse.

 

Click the " Basic " template and enter the right information there.

 

Best wishes, Visti.

 

P.S. For those anxious to tryout the worksheet, its soon finished, and will be

compatible with excel 97, and above.

 

-

Peter Sutcliffe <petermay

 

Monday, September 18, 2000 5:27 PM

Re: Re: Visti's AV Corrected Version

 

 

>

> Dear Visti,

> I just had a look at your worksheet section of the AV program. I'm probably

> a bit dumb but I couldn't quite work out what was to be entered into the

> table. I thought I might as well experiment with this one as you will be

> correcting it soon.

> At the top is says Master Worksheet for the House and you have put there 9.

> I decided to use the example in the lessons so I assumed that the house we

> were interested in was the B house which is the 7th, so I put 7 against the

> House to replace your 9.

> Next you had " Bindus of each Planet " I assumed that here you meant the

> bindus achieved by each planet in its natal position so I put those in. As

> far as I could see that was all I needed to enter so I had a look at the

> results. They were nothing like the worsheet example in Lesson 7. In fact

> they were wrong in rows 2 and 3. Oh by the way I also altered the houses for

> A,B, and C to 2nd, 7th, and 11th. so theoretically it should have been the

> same , at least at that stage.

> I realise that it is probably me doing something wrong but I'm not sure

> what. When you do your correction for the bit you mised could you please be

> more specific on what we should enter.

>

> Thank you,

> Peter

>

>

>