Sv: Help

[Guest guest]

Om Krsna Guru.

You forget, when the Planet with most points aspects either house: A, B or C,

then look to its Samdharmi.

Best wishes, Visti.

 

-

Peter Sutcliffe <petermay

 

Friday, September 22, 2000 4:44 PM

Re: Help

 

 

>

> Dear Donna, Visti, Sanjay,Sandy and other list members

>

> I have been busy trying out the worksheet on people I know and so far I've

> only been able to get one to work out.

> In Michelles the planet which should be the significator aspects House A so

> as far as I know must be eliminated - that is it cannot be used as the

> planet whose sub-period indicates the marriage - yet it does.

>

> In my wifes chart the significator Mars again aspects House A - I believe

> however (from earlier correspondence with Krushna) that as Mars is also the

> lord of the 4th which encourages marriage then it can be used. Are there any

> other exceptions??.

> Below are the birth details of both the above charts.

> 1) Michelle

> DOB 10th June 1960

> Time 4.35am (From Both Parents)

> Zone GMT Daylight savings 1 hour

> Place Manchester UK 2W15 53N30

> Lagna 23 Taurus 18

> Ayanamsa 22:16:32

> Krushna also did the ayanamsa and got 22:16:33 but he did not allow for

> Daylight Savings.

>

> Total Bindu Points (Row 17)

> Ma - 24 Aspects B

> Ju - 22 Aspects A

> Me - 21

> Sa - 17 Aspects A

> Ve - 17 Aspects B

> Su - 15 Aspects B

> Mo - 7 Aspects A

>

> For the above chart in row 10b I showed the Sun aspecting B. In row 11b it

> indicated correctly 5points for the Sun but in row 12b the -5 points did not

> come up. Is this an err4or in the chart Visti. It would have made the Sun

> actually have 10 points which made no difference to the result.

>

> 2) May

> DOB 6th Dec 1930

> Time 11.59am (Rectified)

> Zone GMT No daylight savings

> Place Bradford UK 1W45 53N48

> Lagna 25Cap 59

> Ayanamsa 21:52:40

>

> Total Bindu Points (row 17)

> Ju - 24 Asp A

> Ma - 17 Asp A (But is L.O 4th)

> Sa - 15 Asp A

> Me - 13

> Ve - 10

> Mo - 9 Asp C

> Su - 7

>

> I would be interested to see if you get the same as I do and if so (in

> Michelles chart) can you see any reason which cancels out Saturns aspect to

> A so that it can be used as the main significator ( which it actually is)

> I think Krushna has included most if not all of the laws but he has tended

> to mix them up abit with other rules which do not actually prevent the use

> of a planet's sub period. For example if Venus is <3 or >43 degrees from the

> Sun and particularly if it is aspected by Saturn it becomes a malefic for

> marriage - but it does not prevent it's use for the sub period. I find this

> sort of thing quite confusing.

>

> Peter

>

>

>