Guest guest Posted September 23, 2000 Report Share Posted September 23, 2000 Om Krsna Guru. 1) I think Krushna refers to the same: Sign and Nakshatra. 2) Like you i've been testing some charts, and the answer " seems " to be yes, but I don't think its listed anywhere among the rules, we should ask Krushna for clarification. Best wishes, Visti. - Peter Sutcliffe <petermay Saturday, September 23, 2000 4:00 PM Re: Re: Help > > Dear Sanjay, > I may owe you an appology. When you said that I had forgotten Sandahrmi > planets I thought that you were relating to a sandahrmi for Saturn which was > the one thing I did'nt want. On further thought I realised that you could be > referring to the fact that Saturn could be used as a Sandahrmi planet for > Jupiter, which is exactly what I was looking for I think. > There are two questions though about which I am not sure > 1) When discussing Sandahrmi planets rule 1 says " When two planets are in > the same sign, and the same constellation they are said to be of the same > nature " I thought that " signs were the constellations " . In other words if a > planet is in the same sign it MUST be in the same constellation. ( It is > noted that the constellations are not the same as the signs used for western > astrology) perhaps this is what the rule refers to. > > 2) Cab a planet act as a Sandahrmi planet if it also aspects a significator > house ? > > If the answer to both those question is " Yes " then you are correct and > Saturn would be Sandahrmi to Jupiter in Michelle's chart. > I am not sure how to go from here as the actual date is 1st March 1980 which > is a Saturn/Rahu combination. > > My appologies Visti - itlooks as if you were right and I was wrong. > > Best wishes, > Peter > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.