Guest guest Posted November 23, 2000 Report Share Posted November 23, 2000 Respected Krushnaji, One small point. Planet A in the 4th from planet B becomes samdharmi to B. Does the reverse also happen? Does B also become samdharmi to A. In chart interpretation, it would mean that A can give the result for B but B can't give the result for B if these are not mutual samdharmis. This case would be distinct from, say, planets in the same sign or constellation where they would become mutual samdahrmis and can give the result for each other. Kind regards Sanjay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2000 Report Share Posted November 25, 2000 Dear Sanjay, -- In , " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg@l...> wrote: > Respected Krushnaji, > > One small point. Planet A in the 4th from planet B becomes samdharmi to B.SUBJECT TO CONDITION IF PLANET 'B' IS LESS THEN 4 POINTS. IN THAT CASE 'A' WORKS AS SUBORDINATE TO 'B'. SO IT CAN WORK FOR 'B' IN ITS ABSENT. ( MEANS IF SUB OF A COMES EARLIER THEN IT CAN DO THE JOB OF B, BUT IT SHOULD HAVE MORE THEN 12 POINTS.(17TH ROW) HERE WE SHOULD NOT USE THEM AS SAMDHARMI. HERE A ACT AS SUBORDINATE TO B. BUT B IS NOT SUBORDINATE TO A. > Does the reverse also happen? Does B also become samdharmi to A. In chart > interpretation, it would mean that A can give the result for B but B can't > give the result for B if these are not mutual samdharmis. This case would be > distinct from, say, planets in the same sign or constellation where they > would become mutual samdahrmis and can give the result for each other. WRONG . > > Kind regards > Sanjay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2000 Report Share Posted November 28, 2000 Respected Krushnaji, It is clear from your message that planets in the 4th-10th relationship are not mutual samdharmis. Only the planet in the 4th house, if it has more than 4 points, can give the result for the planet in the tenth house if the planet in the 10th house has less than 4 points. Why then do we take natural 4th -10th lords as mutual samdharmis? Is there some rule for determining which planets have a strong samdharmi relationship and which ones weak? Kind regards Sanjay - " krushna " <krushanain Saturday, November 25, 2000 8:00 PM Re: samdharmi Dear Sanjay, -- In , " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg@l...> wrote: > Respected Krushnaji, > > One small point. Planet A in the 4th from planet B becomes samdharmi to B.SUBJECT TO CONDITION IF PLANET 'B' IS LESS THEN 4 POINTS. IN THAT CASE 'A' WORKS AS SUBORDINATE TO 'B'. SO IT CAN WORK FOR 'B' IN ITS ABSENT. ( MEANS IF SUB OF A COMES EARLIER THEN IT CAN DO THE JOB OF B, BUT IT SHOULD HAVE MORE THEN 12 POINTS.(17TH ROW) HERE WE SHOULD NOT USE THEM AS SAMDHARMI. HERE A ACT AS SUBORDINATE TO B. BUT B IS NOT SUBORDINATE TO A. > Does the reverse also happen? Does B also become samdharmi to A. In chart > interpretation, it would mean that A can give the result for B but B can't > give the result for B if these are not mutual samdharmis. This case would be > distinct from, say, planets in the same sign or constellation where they > would become mutual samdahrmis and can give the result for each other. WRONG . > > Kind regards > Sanjay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2000 Report Share Posted December 3, 2000 Respected Krushnaji, I would appreciate your reply. Kind regards Sanjay - " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg Wednesday, November 29, 2000 2:53 PM Re: Re: samdharmi Respected Krushnaji, It is clear from your message that planets in the 4th-10th relationship are not mutual samdharmis. Only the planet in the 4th house, if it has more than 4 points, can give the result for the planet in the tenth house if the planet in the 10th house has less than 4 points. Why then do we take natural 4th -10th lords as mutual samdharmis? Is there some rule for determining which planets have a strong samdharmi relationship and which ones weak? Kind regards Sanjay - " krushna " <krushanain Saturday, November 25, 2000 8:00 PM Re: samdharmi Dear Sanjay, -- In , " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg@l...> wrote: > Respected Krushnaji, > > One small point. Planet A in the 4th from planet B becomes samdharmi to B.SUBJECT TO CONDITION IF PLANET 'B' IS LESS THEN 4 POINTS. IN THAT CASE 'A' WORKS AS SUBORDINATE TO 'B'. SO IT CAN WORK FOR 'B' IN ITS ABSENT. ( MEANS IF SUB OF A COMES EARLIER THEN IT CAN DO THE JOB OF B, BUT IT SHOULD HAVE MORE THEN 12 POINTS.(17TH ROW) HERE WE SHOULD NOT USE THEM AS SAMDHARMI. HERE A ACT AS SUBORDINATE TO B. BUT B IS NOT SUBORDINATE TO A. > Does the reverse also happen? Does B also become samdharmi to A. In chart > interpretation, it would mean that A can give the result for B but B can't > give the result for B if these are not mutual samdharmis. This case would be > distinct from, say, planets in the same sign or constellation where they > would become mutual samdahrmis and can give the result for each other. WRONG . > > Kind regards > Sanjay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.