Guest guest Posted December 14, 2000 Report Share Posted December 14, 2000 Respected Krushnaji, In your previous lessons, you have told us to calculate points in marriage matters as follows: 5:9 - 30 points 3:11 - 20 points 4:10 - 10 points 2:12 - 5 points 6:8 - 0 points You have not mentioned the points of a 7:7 relationship. Is this like a 6:8 relationship? Kind regards Sanjay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2000 Report Share Posted December 15, 2000 Dear Sanjay, This is for the marital relation. for 7:7 relation treat as 4:10 krushna > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg > > > Points >Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:05:50 +0700 > >Respected Krushnaji, > >In your previous lessons, you have told us to calculate points in marriage >matters as follows: > >5:9 - 30 points >3:11 - 20 points >4:10 - 10 points >2:12 - 5 points >6:8 - 0 points > >You have not mentioned the points of a 7:7 relationship. Is this like a 6:8 >relationship? > >Kind regards >Sanjay > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2000 Report Share Posted December 18, 2000 Respected Krushnaji, Thank you. For general house analysis other than marriage, you have told us to look at the lord of house B. If it is one of the natural opposite house lords, then we have to look at the position of the lord of house B versus the position of its natural opposition lord. Now 6:8 relationship would be the worst, then 2:12. 5:9 is good and 3:11 is not bad. How about 4:10 and 7:7? Kind regards Sanjay Jaggia - " krushna kalani J.K. " <krushanain Saturday, December 16, 2000 2:02 AM Re: Points Dear Sanjay, This is for the marital relation. for 7:7 relation treat as 4:10 krushna > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg > > > Points >Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:05:50 +0700 > >Respected Krushnaji, > >In your previous lessons, you have told us to calculate points in marriage >matters as follows: > >5:9 - 30 points >3:11 - 20 points >4:10 - 10 points >2:12 - 5 points >6:8 - 0 points > >You have not mentioned the points of a 7:7 relationship. Is this like a 6:8 >relationship? > >Kind regards >Sanjay > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2000 Report Share Posted December 19, 2000 Dear Sanjay, 4:10 indicates opposition with due respect. Such relations are not breask up, or gives bad results. 7:7 is one is dominating other, can be judged from the sarvastak points in the houses. The house with more point is dominatinf other. The effect is only when difference more then 25% of the maximum points krushna > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg > > >Re: Points >Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:45:44 +0700 > >Respected Krushnaji, > >Thank you. For general house analysis other than marriage, you have told us >to look at the lord of house B. If it is one of the natural opposite house >lords, then we have to look at the position of the lord of house B versus >the position of its natural opposition lord. Now 6:8 relationship would be >the worst, then 2:12. 5:9 is good and 3:11 is not bad. How about 4:10 and >7:7? > >Kind regards >Sanjay Jaggia >- > " krushna kalani J.K. " <krushanain > >Saturday, December 16, 2000 2:02 AM >Re: Points > > >Dear Sanjay, > This is for the marital relation. for 7:7 relation treat as 4:10 >krushna > > > > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg > > > > > > Points > >Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:05:50 +0700 > > > >Respected Krushnaji, > > > >In your previous lessons, you have told us to calculate points in >marriage > >matters as follows: > > > >5:9 - 30 points > >3:11 - 20 points > >4:10 - 10 points > >2:12 - 5 points > >6:8 - 0 points > > > >You have not mentioned the points of a 7:7 relationship. Is this like a >6:8 > >relationship? > > > >Kind regards > >Sanjay > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2000 Report Share Posted December 19, 2000 Respected Krushnaji, Thank you for the clarification. Kind regards Sanjay - " krushna kalani J.K. " <krushanain Wednesday, December 20, 2000 2:36 AM Re: Points Dear Sanjay, 4:10 indicates opposition with due respect. Such relations are not breask up, or gives bad results. 7:7 is one is dominating other, can be judged from the sarvastak points in the houses. The house with more point is dominatinf other. The effect is only when difference more then 25% of the maximum points krushna > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg > > >Re: Points >Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:45:44 +0700 > >Respected Krushnaji, > >Thank you. For general house analysis other than marriage, you have told us >to look at the lord of house B. If it is one of the natural opposite house >lords, then we have to look at the position of the lord of house B versus >the position of its natural opposition lord. Now 6:8 relationship would be >the worst, then 2:12. 5:9 is good and 3:11 is not bad. How about 4:10 and >7:7? > >Kind regards >Sanjay Jaggia >- > " krushna kalani J.K. " <krushanain > >Saturday, December 16, 2000 2:02 AM >Re: Points > > >Dear Sanjay, > This is for the marital relation. for 7:7 relation treat as 4:10 >krushna > > > > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg > > > > > > Points > >Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:05:50 +0700 > > > >Respected Krushnaji, > > > >In your previous lessons, you have told us to calculate points in >marriage > >matters as follows: > > > >5:9 - 30 points > >3:11 - 20 points > >4:10 - 10 points > >2:12 - 5 points > >6:8 - 0 points > > > >You have not mentioned the points of a 7:7 relationship. Is this like a >6:8 > >relationship? > > > >Kind regards > >Sanjay > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2002 Report Share Posted June 16, 2002 Dear Krushnaji, This is one of the past post that I wanted to ask you something about. Only remaining one would be 1:7 relation for maritial relation. 1:7 is that of enimity, so should 1:7 relation be treated as 6:8. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash , " krushna kalani J.K. " <krushanain@h...> wrote: > Dear Sanjay, > This is for the marital relation. for 7:7 relation treat as 4:10 > krushna > > > > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg@l...> > >@e... > ><@e...> > > Points > >Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:05:50 +0700 > > > >Respected Krushnaji, > > > >In your previous lessons, you have told us to calculate points in marriage > >matters as follows: > > > >5:9 - 30 points > >3:11 - 20 points > >4:10 - 10 points > >2:12 - 5 points > >6:8 - 0 points > > > >You have not mentioned the points of a 7:7 relationship. Is this like a 6:8 > >relationship? > > > >Kind regards > >Sanjay > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2002 Report Share Posted June 17, 2002 Dear Ash, Actually there is no combination called as 7/7. it should be called as 1/7. As Sanjay asked so I answered in the same way. It shoyuld be noted as 1/7. This should be considered as 4/10. In 4/10 combination there is hidden respect for each other, and in 1/7 combination, each one tries to dominate other. krushna , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73@h...> wrote: > Dear Krushnaji, > This is one of the past post that I wanted to ask you something > about. > > Only remaining one would be 1:7 relation for maritial relation. > 1:7 is that of enimity, so should 1:7 relation be treated as 6:8. > Thanking you, > Cheers !!! > Ash > > , " krushna kalani J.K. " > <krushanain@h...> wrote: > > Dear Sanjay, > > This is for the marital relation. for 7:7 relation treat as > 4:10 > > krushna > > > > > > > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg@l...> > > >@e... > > ><@e...> > > > Points > > >Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:05:50 +0700 > > > > > >Respected Krushnaji, > > > > > >In your previous lessons, you have told us to calculate points in > marriage > > >matters as follows: > > > > > >5:9 - 30 points > > >3:11 - 20 points > > >4:10 - 10 points > > >2:12 - 5 points > > >6:8 - 0 points > > > > > >You have not mentioned the points of a 7:7 relationship. Is this > like a 6:8 > > >relationship? > > > > > >Kind regards > > >Sanjay > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2002 Report Share Posted June 17, 2002 Dear Krushnaji, Thank you for your answer. What happens when 1st lord and 7th lord are together in any house. They would become samdharmi, so how should it be treated if you were to give them points. Should it be like 5:9 since, 1st house is kendra and also a trine so can we treat them as trines, or like 4:10 where we are considering them like kendras. 1:7, now with this post of yours, I understand that they can be treated like 4:10 as both are kendras. Thank you. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash , " krushanain " <krushanain> wrote: > Dear Ash, > Actually there is no combination called as 7/7. it should > be called as 1/7. As Sanjay asked so I answered in the same way. It > shoyuld be noted as 1/7. > This should be considered as 4/10. In 4/10 combination > there is hidden respect for each other, and in 1/7 combination, each > one tries to dominate other. > krushna > > , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73@h...> > wrote: > > Dear Krushnaji, > > This is one of the past post that I wanted to ask you something > > about. > > > > Only remaining one would be 1:7 relation for maritial relation. > > 1:7 is that of enimity, so should 1:7 relation be treated as 6:8. > > Thanking you, > > Cheers !!! > > Ash > > > > , " krushna kalani J.K. " > > <krushanain@h...> wrote: > > > Dear Sanjay, > > > This is for the marital relation. for 7:7 relation treat as > > 4:10 > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg@l...> > > > >@e... > > > ><@e...> > > > > Points > > > >Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:05:50 +0700 > > > > > > > >Respected Krushnaji, > > > > > > > >In your previous lessons, you have told us to calculate points > in > > marriage > > > >matters as follows: > > > > > > > >5:9 - 30 points > > > >3:11 - 20 points > > > >4:10 - 10 points > > > >2:12 - 5 points > > > >6:8 - 0 points > > > > > > > >You have not mentioned the points of a 7:7 relationship. Is this > > like a 6:8 > > > >relationship? > > > > > > > >Kind regards > > > >Sanjay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2002 Report Share Posted June 18, 2002 Dear Ash, When two planets are in one sign, and when they are lord of 1/and 7th house, if those are very close to each other they will be treated as 4/10 lords, but if difference is more then 15 degrees they may be treated as 2/12 lords. Even if such lords are treated as samdharmi, but if they exchange for some event, it will not result in pure happiness. Lagna is common for trine and kendra, but there is difference for these things. in trine signs, the constilations are same. so this can be only with the lord of the trine sign. For understanding the difference, for cancer lagna, 5th house is scorpio, if Lord of Lagna is situated in 5th house which is the neecha rashi for Moon, but in this perticular case it will not be treated as in neech sign. So lagna lord can be treated only if related to 5th or 9th house. Not with any other house or kendra house. But if Moon in 7th house, capricorn, is in the sign of enemy. It looses it's strength. now if Moon and Saturn are in one house. in first case, when they are in 5th house, moon will have more power, as it becames yog karak. in 2nd case when they are in 7th Moon, will not give better result for Saturn. (for your information: similarly Sun in libra in 4th house for cancer lagna, is also not treated as in neech sign, as it is kendra stan) krushna , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73@h...> wrote: > Dear Krushnaji, > > Thank you for your answer. > > What happens when 1st lord and 7th lord are together in any house. > They would become samdharmi, so how should it be treated if you were > to give them points. > Should it be like 5:9 since, 1st house is kendra and also a trine so > can we treat them as trines, or like 4:10 where we are considering > them like kendras. > > 1:7, now with this post of yours, I understand that they can be > treated like 4:10 as both are kendras. Thank you. > > Thanking you, > Cheers !!! > Ash > > , " krushanain " <krushanain> > wrote: > > Dear Ash, > > Actually there is no combination called as 7/7. it should > > be called as 1/7. As Sanjay asked so I answered in the same way. It > > shoyuld be noted as 1/7. > > This should be considered as 4/10. In 4/10 combination > > there is hidden respect for each other, and in 1/7 combination, > each > > one tries to dominate other. > > krushna > > > > , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73@h...> > > wrote: > > > Dear Krushnaji, > > > This is one of the past post that I wanted to ask you something > > > about. > > > > > > Only remaining one would be 1:7 relation for maritial relation. > > > 1:7 is that of enimity, so should 1:7 relation be treated as 6:8. > > > Thanking you, > > > Cheers !!! > > > Ash > > > > > > , " krushna kalani J.K. " > > > <krushanain@h...> wrote: > > > > Dear Sanjay, > > > > This is for the marital relation. for 7:7 relation treat > as > > > 4:10 > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg@l...> > > > > >@e... > > > > ><@e...> > > > > > Points > > > > >Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:05:50 +0700 > > > > > > > > > >Respected Krushnaji, > > > > > > > > > >In your previous lessons, you have told us to calculate points > > in > > > marriage > > > > >matters as follows: > > > > > > > > > >5:9 - 30 points > > > > >3:11 - 20 points > > > > >4:10 - 10 points > > > > >2:12 - 5 points > > > > >6:8 - 0 points > > > > > > > > > >You have not mentioned the points of a 7:7 relationship. Is > this > > > like a 6:8 > > > > >relationship? > > > > > > > > > >Kind regards > > > > >Sanjay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 19, 2002 Report Share Posted June 19, 2002 Dear Krushnaji, Thank you for this post. You have covered a lot in this mail. I will think more about this post, and get back with questions or clarifications if I have them. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash , " krushanain " <krushanain> wrote: > Dear Ash, > When two planets are in one sign, and when they are lord of > 1/and 7th house, if those are very close to each other they will be > treated as 4/10 lords, but if difference is more then 15 degrees they > may be treated as 2/12 lords. > Even if such lords are treated as samdharmi, but if they > exchange for some event, it will not result in pure happiness. > Lagna is common for trine and kendra, but there is > difference for these things. in trine signs, the constilations are > same. so this can be only with the lord of the trine sign. > For understanding the difference, for cancer lagna, 5th > house is scorpio, if Lord of Lagna is situated in 5th house which is > the neecha rashi for Moon, but in this perticular case it will not be > treated as in neech sign. So lagna lord can be treated only if > related to 5th or 9th house. Not with any other house or kendra > house. > But if Moon in 7th house, capricorn, is in the sign of > enemy. It looses it's strength. now if Moon and Saturn are in one > house. in first case, when they are in 5th house, moon will have more > power, as it becames yog karak. in 2nd case when they are in 7th > Moon, will not give better result for Saturn. > (for your information: similarly Sun in libra in 4th house > for cancer lagna, is also not treated as in neech sign, as it is > kendra stan) > krushna > > > , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73@h...> > wrote: > > Dear Krushnaji, > > > > Thank you for your answer. > > > > What happens when 1st lord and 7th lord are together in any house. > > They would become samdharmi, so how should it be treated if you > were > > to give them points. > > Should it be like 5:9 since, 1st house is kendra and also a trine > so > > can we treat them as trines, or like 4:10 where we are considering > > them like kendras. > > > > 1:7, now with this post of yours, I understand that they can be > > treated like 4:10 as both are kendras. Thank you. > > > > Thanking you, > > Cheers !!! > > Ash > > > > , " krushanain " > <krushanain> > > wrote: > > > Dear Ash, > > > Actually there is no combination called as 7/7. it > should > > > be called as 1/7. As Sanjay asked so I answered in the same way. > It > > > shoyuld be noted as 1/7. > > > This should be considered as 4/10. In 4/10 combination > > > there is hidden respect for each other, and in 1/7 combination, > > each > > > one tries to dominate other. > > > krushna > > > > > > , " ashsam73 " <ashsam73@h...> > > > wrote: > > > > Dear Krushnaji, > > > > This is one of the past post that I wanted to ask you > something > > > > about. > > > > > > > > Only remaining one would be 1:7 relation for maritial relation. > > > > 1:7 is that of enimity, so should 1:7 relation be treated as > 6:8. > > > > Thanking you, > > > > Cheers !!! > > > > Ash > > > > > > > > , " krushna kalani J.K. " > > > > <krushanain@h...> wrote: > > > > > Dear Sanjay, > > > > > This is for the marital relation. for 7:7 relation treat > > as > > > > 4:10 > > > > > krushna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Sanjay Jaggia " <sanjaygg@l...> > > > > > >@e... > > > > > ><@e...> > > > > > > Points > > > > > >Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:05:50 +0700 > > > > > > > > > > > >Respected Krushnaji, > > > > > > > > > > > >In your previous lessons, you have told us to calculate > points > > > in > > > > marriage > > > > > >matters as follows: > > > > > > > > > > > >5:9 - 30 points > > > > > >3:11 - 20 points > > > > > >4:10 - 10 points > > > > > >2:12 - 5 points > > > > > >6:8 - 0 points > > > > > > > > > > > >You have not mentioned the points of a 7:7 relationship. Is > > this > > > > like a 6:8 > > > > > >relationship? > > > > > > > > > > > >Kind regards > > > > > >Sanjay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.