Krushna-Solution to exercise ( with theory)

[Guest guest]

Dear Krushna and list members

 

To test my understanding of the system, using Krushna's table of numerical

strength in Ron's chart [trying at this point to understand principles not

numbers]:

 

Birth of 1st and 2nd children in Rahu sub in Sag = Jup

I look for B in 5th hse

Jupiter in 5th has 40 pts

Jupiter aspects A but it's irrelevant because this is Rahu's period.

Rahu does NOT cast aspects. If he did then he would be disqualified because

of his 5th aspect on C.

If these statements are correct, then Rahu is good for birth of children, if

not, I am missing the proper explanation

 

Birth of 2nd child in Venus sub

I look for B in the 5th hse

Venus in 5th has 40 pts

Venus does NOT aspect A, B or C

Venus sub gave a child

 

Eleventh house represents cash flow/income

There might be an adverse impact on cash flow during the sub of a planet with

12 or less points in the 4th hse [6th from 11th=debts, problems in general]

or in the 6th hse [8th from 11th=similar, but worse & interruptionn in

earnings] or in the 10th hse [12th from 11th=excessive expenditures, loss of

cash flow].

 

-4TH AS B as it relates to 11th= All planets have more than 12 pts. The worse

3 are moon [14], mars [17] and saturn [18]. Moon sits in A hse, but since

it's not an aspect, it is not disqualified. Mars is not disqualified, and as

lord of E is eager to act. Saturn aspects the B hse, so he is disqualified.

So, this Moon and then Mars are the worse and not that bad with 14 and 17

pts, respectively, meaning there will be little debt incurrence and related

cash flow problems, even during their subs?

 

-6TH AS B as it relates to 11th= All planets have more than 12 pts., except

for Sun with 9 pts The worse 3 are Sun and then moon [18] and saturn [18].

Sun is disqualified as he aspecs the B hse. Saturn is disqualified as it

aspects the A hse . Moon is not disqualified and eager to act because it sits

in the E hse, but since it has 18 pts, it would NOT indicate serious money

problems during his subs although a drop in income might be expected anyway,

moon having only 12 pts in the 11th hse.

 

-10TH AS B as it relates to 11th= Saturn has 8pts, Moon has 9pts, Sun has

14pts and Mars has 15pts. Moon aspects A and is disqualified, none of the

others is disqualified and Saturn is eager to act as lord of D in D. So cash

flow problems could be expected, all due to expenses being greater than

income, most particularly during saturn subs, and even more so because it has

only 13 pts in the 11th hse?

However, Mars would never be problematic during his subs income-wise because

he has 33pts in the 11th hse, far in excess of his 15pts in hse 10.

 

Would it be appropriate to compare a weak sub in the 11th hse to the same sub

in the 10th or 6th hse to see whether a drop in earnings can be expected?

 

PLEASE, tell me if the reasoning is sound so far, before I go on this path.

ALSO, I have a feeling from your explanations in " solution to exercise " , that

Sanjay's answers in the exercise may not be 100% correct in non-longevity

cases. So, please, could you review his and Margarita's exercises and my

questions re same when you have a chance.

 

Regards and many thanks for this truly exciting view of jyotish you are

offering your students.

Christine

[Guest guest]

DEAR CHRITINE,

MY COMMENTS ARE IN CAPITALS

KRUSHNA

 

 

>XINEFOURNI

>

>

>Re: Krushna-Solution to exercise ( with

>theory)

>Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:25:57 EST

>

>Dear Krushna and list members

>

>To test my understanding of the system, using Krushna's table of numerical

>strength in Ron's chart [trying at this point to understand principles not

>numbers]:

>

>Birth of 1st and 2nd children in Rahu sub in Sag = Jup

>I look for B in 5th hse

>Jupiter in 5th has 40 pts (SEE MERCURY IS ALSO HAVING 24 POINTS LORD OF

>'D')

>Jupiter aspects A but it's irrelevant because this is Rahu's period.

>Rahu does NOT cast aspects. If he did then he would be disqualified (NOT

>DISQUALIFIED BUT SUCH PLANET DONOT GIVE RESULT ON ITS OWN ACCORD, BUT GET

>THE RESULT BY SOME SAMDHARMI, HERE RAHU IS SAMDHARMI TO JUPITER AND ALSO

>FOR MERCURY) WE DO NOT CONSIDER THE ASPECT OF RAHU.

because

>of his 5th aspect on C.

>If these statements are correct, then Rahu is good for birth of children,

>if

>not, I am missing the proper explanation RAHU CAN REPRESENT jUPITER AND

>MERCURY. SO CONCEPTION IS SUCH PERIOD IS POSSIBLE.

>

>Birth of 2nd child in Venus sub ( IT IS FOR 3RD CHILD, SECOND SON )

>I look for B in the 5th hse

>Venus in 5th has 40 pts CORRECT

>Venus does NOT aspect A, B or C

>Venus sub gave a child CORRECT

>

>Eleventh house represents cash flow/income

>There might be an adverse impact on cash flow during the sub of a planet

>with

>12 or less points in the 4th hse [6th from 11th=debts, problems in

>general]THIS IS INVESTMENT NOT DEBTS

>or in the 6th hse [8th from 11th=similar, but worse & interruptionn in

>earnings] or in the 10th hse [12th from 11th=excessive expenditures, loss

>of

>cash flow]. SIXTH IS KARAK FOR 11TH HOUSE. IT IS SERVICE OR WORK DONE GETS

>ENCASHED.

>

>-4TH AS B as it relates to 11th= All planets have more than 12 pts. The

>worse

>3 are moon [14], mars [17] and saturn [18]. Moon sits in A hse, but since

>it's not an aspect, it is not disqualified. Mars is not disqualified, and

>as

>lord of E is eager to act. Saturn aspects the B hse, so he is disqualified.

>So, this Moon and then Mars are the worse and not that bad with 14 and 17

>pts, respectively, meaning there will be little debt incurrence and

>related

>cash flow problems, even during their subs?

>

>-6TH AS B as it relates to 11th= All planets have more than 12 pts., except

>for Sun with 9 pts The worse 3 are Sun and then moon [18] and saturn [18].

>Sun is disqualified as he aspecs the B hse. Saturn is disqualified as it

>aspects the A hse . Moon is not disqualified and eager to act because it

>sits

>in the E hse, but since it has 18 pts, it would NOT indicate serious money

>problems during his subs although a drop in income might be expected

>anyway,

>moon having only 12 pts in the 11th hse.

>

>-10TH AS B as it relates to 11th= Saturn has 8pts, Moon has 9pts, Sun has

>14pts and Mars has 15pts. Moon aspects A and is disqualified, none of the

>others is disqualified and Saturn is eager to act as lord of D in D. So

>cash

>flow problems could be expected, all due to expenses being greater than

>income, most particularly during saturn subs, and even more so because it

>has

>only 13 pts in the 11th hse?

>However, Mars would never be problematic during his subs income-wise

>because

>he has 33pts in the 11th hse, far in excess of his 15pts in hse 10.

>

>Would it be appropriate to compare a weak sub in the 11th hse to the same

>sub

>in the 10th or 6th hse to see whether a drop in earnings can be expected?

>YOUR THINKING IS ON CORRECT PATH. SATURN BEING LESS POINTS FOR 10TH WILL

>INDICATE CHANGE OF JOB, LEAVING THE JOB, SITTING IDEAL WITH OUT ANY JOB,

>(IT WILL ACT CONTRA TO JUPITER)

>

>PLEASE, tell me if the reasoning is sound so far, before I go on this path.

>ALSO, I have a feeling from your explanations in " solution to exercise " ,

>that

>Sanjay's answers in the exercise may not be 100% correct in non-longevity

>cases. So, please, could you review his and Margarita's exercises and my

>questions re same when you have a chance. I WILL READ THEIR FINDINGS AND

>THEN COMMENTS

>

>Regards and many thanks for this truly exciting view of jyotish you are

>offering your students.

>Christine

 

_______________________

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

[Guest guest]

Dear Krushna

 

Sorry I did not thank you for your answer yesterday, but I was kept very busy

reading your lessons at long last [except for the 7th which I have not

received yet] and setting up by hand 12 mini master charts for each sign of

the zodiac..and as a result, although I will have questions [!], I think I am

beginning to better understand your system, and that I was all wrong in the

previous email. Continue reading...

 

At this point, I want to test if the approach below is correct for predictive

analysis

using Ron's chart and the numbers you gave in Solution to exercise.

 

On September 1, 2000, Ron was running Venus sub. Let's assume we wanted to

know what kind of events could be expected during this sub after sept 1, and

pretend we don't know he had a hernia injury on the 2nd sept. and hernia

operation on the 10th of sept..

 

Here we go: Asc is Leo, Venus is lord of 3rd and 10th hses, located in Leo in

the first house.

1. I determine the functional significations of Venus as karyesh for Leo asc.

He is lord of A in the 3rd hse chart and in the 8th hse chart. He sits in A

of the 6th hse chart. This gives us 3 indications that Venus is karyesh for

health and therefore of health as an issue during Venus sub [3rd hse for

physical fitness, 6th hse for ill health and 8th hse for chronic/incurable

disease and severe mental anguish]. And, Venus at 10deg leo is in Mrityu

Bhaga, and that seals it!!!

Note: This fits with Parashara's teaching that Venus is a functional malefic

for Leo, asc! Although it must be coincidence since Mercury should be also

and does not seem so bad in your system.

 

2. I then determine the hses for which Venus, as lord of 3rd and 10th hses

for Leo asc., gives results.

a] as lord of the 3rd hse [b in 3rd hse chart], Venus gives the results of

the 6th and 10th hses from the asc. [6 hse theme of ill health again]

b] as lord of the 10th hse [b in 10th hse chart], Venus gives the results of

the 1st and 5th hses from the asc.[1st hse of general health]

c] above is reinforced by the fact that Venus is located in hse B of

the 1st hse chart, which could give 8th hse results, but for the fact that

Venus has only 4 pts in Leo and needed 5 for the rule to apply.

3. Since there are enough indications of potential ill health, I look further

at Venus in the 6th hse chart, 8th hse chart and 1st hse chart:

a] Venus in the 6th hse chart: He is lord of hse D [ 2nd strongest upachaya]

[As well as C-but I don't know what that means.] He does not aspect hses

A,B,C, but it would not matter if he did because he is lord of D. He has 36

pts in hse B of the 6th hse chart [Capricorn], very high and 2nd highest

after Jupiter. Jupiter is disqualified because he aspects C of the 6th hse

chart. Saturn, his samdharmi, has more than 12 pts in Capricorn, but is

disqualified because he aspects A of the 6th hse chart.

VENUS WILL PROMOTE DISEASE. QUESTION: Would it have done so, if either

Jupiter or his samdharmi had been qualified to act?

b] Venus in the 8th hse chart: He sits in hse E and does not aspect A,B or C.

He

has only 11 pts in hse B of the 8th hse chart [pisces], 3rd lowest after Moon

[8pts] and Saturn [10 pts].

QUESTION: DID VENUS promote disease because of his high count in the 6th hse

chart or his low count in the 8th? I assume the high count in 6th is

responsible but your comments about Saturn's low count giving adverse 10th

hse results for Ron is confusing and expansion of your comments on that

would be helpful.

c] Venus in the 1st house chart: He sits in B and is lord of D. He does not

throw a disqualifying glance. He has 36 pts in B in the 1st hse chart, the

highest number of points. THIS emphasis on the 1st would not necessarily

indicate illness but because of the 6th hse results it focuses on the general

health significations of the 1st hse?

ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS:

Which part of the analysis could I have skipped? did I forget to consider?

Using the same analysis, I can similarly explain the birth of Ron's 3rd child

during Venus sub. BUT using the same analysis, I can't explain emigration.

Venus, as karyesh and as lord of 3rd and 10th, does not seem linked to the

7th, 9th and 12th. Was it acting as samdharmi for someone or what??

Obviously, childbirth when Ron was younger and ill health now he is older

makes a lot of sense. Still, why was there no illness around the time his 3rd

child was born? If not, this makes the system less foolproof, no?

Should I go to my favorite books on medical astrology to figure out the

hernia, or are there special rules on this in your system I should be

applying?

Krushna, where do you live in India?

Many thanks and regards

Christine

DEAR CHRITINE,

MY COMMENTS ARE IN CAPITALS

KRUSHNA

>XINEFOURNI

>

>

>Re: Krushna-Solution to exercise ( with

>theory)

>Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:25:57 EST

>

>Dear Krushna and list members

>

>To test my understanding of the system, using Krushna's table of numerical

>strength in Ron's chart [trying at this point to understand principles not

>numbers]:

>

>Birth of 1st and 2nd children in Rahu sub in Sag = Jup

>I look for B in 5th hse

>Jupiter in 5th has 40 pts (SEE MERCURY IS ALSO HAVING 24 POINTS LORD OF

>'D')

>Jupiter aspects A but it's irrelevant because this is Rahu's period.

>Rahu does NOT cast aspects. If he did then he would be disqualified (NOT

>DISQUALIFIED BUT SUCH PLANET DONOT GIVE RESULT ON ITS OWN ACCORD, BUT GET

>THE RESULT BY SOME SAMDHARMI, HERE RAHU IS SAMDHARMI TO JUPITER AND ALSO

>FOR MERCURY) WE DO NOT CONSIDER THE ASPECT OF RAHU.

because

>of his 5th aspect on C.

>If these statements are correct, then Rahu is good for birth of children,

>if

>not, I am missing the proper explanation RAHU CAN REPRESENT jUPITER AND

>MERCURY. SO CONCEPTION IS SUCH PERIOD IS POSSIBLE.

>

>Birth of 2nd child in Venus sub ( IT IS FOR 3RD CHILD, SECOND SON )

>I look for B in the 5th hse

>Venus in 5th has 40 pts CORRECT

>Venus does NOT aspect A, B or C

>Venus sub gave a child CORRECT

>

>Eleventh house represents cash flow/income

>There might be an adverse impact on cash flow during the sub of a planet

>with

>12 or less points in the 4th hse [6th from 11th=debts, problems in

>general]THIS IS INVESTMENT NOT DEBTS

>or in the 6th hse [8th from 11th=similar, but worse & interruptionn in

>earnings] or in the 10th hse [12th from 11th=excessive expenditures, loss

>of

>cash flow]. SIXTH IS KARAK FOR 11TH HOUSE. IT IS SERVICE OR WORK DONE GETS

>ENCASHED.

>

>-4TH AS B as it relates to 11th= All planets have more than 12 pts. The

>worse

>3 are moon [14], mars [17] and saturn [18]. Moon sits in A hse, but since

>it's not an aspect, it is not disqualified. Mars is not disqualified, and

>as

>lord of E is eager to act. Saturn aspects the B hse, so he is disqualified.

>So, this Moon and then Mars are the worse and not that bad with 14 and 17

>pts, respectively, meaning there will be little debt incurrence and

>related

>cash flow problems, even during their subs?

>

>-6TH AS B as it relates to 11th= All planets have more than 12 pts., except

>for Sun with 9 pts The worse 3 are Sun and then moon [18] and saturn [18].

>Sun is disqualified as he aspecs the B hse. Saturn is disqualified as it

>aspects the A hse . Moon is not disqualified and eager to act because it

>sits

>in the E hse, but since it has 18 pts, it would NOT indicate serious money

>problems during his subs although a drop in income might be expected

>anyway,

>moon having only 12 pts in the 11th hse.

>

>-10TH AS B as it relates to 11th= Saturn has 8pts, Moon has 9pts, Sun has

>14pts and Mars has 15pts. Moon aspects A and is disqualified, none of the

>others is disqualified and Saturn is eager to act as lord of D in D. So

>cash

>flow problems could be expected, all due to expenses being greater than

>income, most particularly during saturn subs, and even more so because it

>has

>only 13 pts in the 11th hse?

>However, Mars would never be problematic during his subs income-wise

>because

>he has 33pts in the 11th hse, far in excess of his 15pts in hse 10.

>

>Would it be appropriate to compare a weak sub in the 11th hse to the same

>sub

>in the 10th or 6th hse to see whether a drop in earnings can be expected?

>YOUR THINKING IS ON CORRECT PATH. SATURN BEING LESS POINTS FOR 10TH WILL

>INDICATE CHANGE OF JOB, LEAVING THE JOB, SITTING IDEAL WITH OUT ANY JOB,

>(IT WILL ACT CONTRA TO JUPITER)

>

>PLEASE, tell me if the reasoning is sound so far, before I go on this path.

>ALSO, I have a feeling from your explanations in " solution to exercise " ,

>that

>Sanjay's answers in the exercise may not be 100% correct in non-longevity

>cases. So, please, could you review his and Margarita's exercises and my

>questions re same when you have a chance. I WILL READ THEIR FINDINGS AND

>THEN COMMENTS

>

>Regards and many thanks for this truly exciting view of jyotish you are

>offering your students.

>Christine

_______________________

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

[Guest guest]

Dear Christine,

The operation, accidents, theft, partenership etc are denoted

by 7th house. If you see the table Mercury gives only 7 points for

7th house. He have got operated in mercury, or Ketu or Rahu or Venus

sub. Ketu and Rahu both indicates Mercury.

1./ Operated ear 6th May 1969, Ketu Sub. Suns transit in Moons

constellation, and sigh of Venus.

2. 23rd Sept 1977, operated circumcision Rahu Sub ( means mercury),

Sun's transit in Mercury sign and sun/ moon constellation.

3. 5th June 1984 operated Hernia Mercury Sub, Sun in Venus sign Moon

constellation.

4. 7th Jan 94 operated Cyst on back Rahu Sub ( mercury) sun in Venus

Constellation.

5. 2nd Sept 2000 hernia injury Venus Sub sun in Venus Constellation

6. Operated on 10th nov 2000 Venus Sub Sun in Venus sign

constellation of Jupiter.

 

Other instances

Shop Robbed in Mercury Sub 16th Feb 1984.

Mercury given good results for sale purchase of landed/ house

property and starting insurance business.

 

Mercury is having less points in 7th house. Venus is having

less in 8th house Saturn is having less in 3rd, 5th, 7th, 8th,and

10th.

Venus is natural samdharmi to Saturm.

This system gives result direct by numerical value. Knowedge

of other teachings and Vedic astrology definitely helps in

understanding the system.

krushna 21/12/2000

 

 

, XINEFOURNI@a... wrote:

> Dear Krushna

>

> Sorry I did not thank you for your answer yesterday, but I was kept

very busy

> reading your lessons at long last [except for the 7th which I have

not

> received yet] and setting up by hand 12 mini master charts for each

sign of

> the zodiac..and as a result, although I will have questions [!], I

think I am

> beginning to better understand your system, and that I was all

wrong in the

> previous email. Continue reading...

>

> At this point, I want to test if the approach below is correct for

predictive

> analysis

> using Ron's chart and the numbers you gave in Solution to exercise.

>

> On September 1, 2000, Ron was running Venus sub. Let's assume we

wanted to

> know what kind of events could be expected during this sub after

sept 1, and

> pretend we don't know he had a hernia injury on the 2nd sept. and

hernia

> operation on the 10th of sept..

>

> Here we go: Asc is Leo, Venus is lord of 3rd and 10th hses, located

in Leo in

> the first house.

> 1. I determine the functional significations of Venus as karyesh

for Leo asc.

> He is lord of A in the 3rd hse chart and in the 8th hse chart. He

sits in A

> of the 6th hse chart. This gives us 3 indications that Venus is

karyesh for

> health and therefore of health as an issue during Venus sub [3rd

hse for

> physical fitness, 6th hse for ill health and 8th hse for

chronic/incurable

> disease and severe mental anguish]. And, Venus at 10deg leo is in

Mrityu

> Bhaga, and that seals it!!!

> Note: This fits with Parashara's teaching that Venus is a

functional malefic

> for Leo, asc! Although it must be coincidence since Mercury should

be also

> and does not seem so bad in your system.

>

> 2. I then determine the hses for which Venus, as lord of 3rd and

10th hses

> for Leo asc., gives results.

> a] as lord of the 3rd hse [b in 3rd hse chart], Venus gives the

results of

> the 6th and 10th hses from the asc. [6 hse theme of ill health

again]

> b] as lord of the 10th hse [b in 10th hse chart], Venus gives the

results of

> the 1st and 5th hses from the asc.[1st hse of general health]

> c] above is reinforced by the fact that Venus is located in

hse B of

> the 1st hse chart, which could give 8th hse results, but for the

fact that

> Venus has only 4 pts in Leo and needed 5 for the rule to apply.

>

> 3. Since there are enough indications of potential ill health, I

look further

> at Venus in the 6th hse chart, 8th hse chart and 1st hse chart:

> a] Venus in the 6th hse chart: He is lord of hse D [ 2nd strongest

upachaya]

> [As well as C-but I don't know what that means.] He does not aspect

hses

> A,B,C, but it would not matter if he did because he is lord of D.

He has 36

> pts in hse B of the 6th hse chart [Capricorn], very high and 2nd

highest

> after Jupiter. Jupiter is disqualified because he aspects C of the

6th hse

> chart. Saturn, his samdharmi, has more than 12 pts in Capricorn,

but is

> disqualified because he aspects A of the 6th hse chart.

> VENUS WILL PROMOTE DISEASE. QUESTION: Would it have done so, if

either

> Jupiter or his samdharmi had been qualified to act?

>

> b] Venus in the 8th hse chart: He sits in hse E and does not aspect

A,B or C.

> He

> has only 11 pts in hse B of the 8th hse chart [pisces], 3rd lowest

after Moon

> [8pts] and Saturn [10 pts].

> QUESTION: DID VENUS promote disease because of his high count in

the 6th hse

> chart or his low count in the 8th? I assume the high count in 6th

is

> responsible but your comments about Saturn's low count giving

adverse 10th

> hse results for Ron is confusing and expansion of your comments on

that

> would be helpful.

>

> c] Venus in the 1st house chart: He sits in B and is lord of D. He

does not

> throw a disqualifying glance. He has 36 pts in B in the 1st hse

chart, the

> highest number of points. THIS emphasis on the 1st would not

necessarily

> indicate illness but because of the 6th hse results it focuses on

the general

> health significations of the 1st hse?

>

> ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS:

> Which part of the analysis could I have skipped? did I forget to

consider?

> Using the same analysis, I can similarly explain the birth of Ron's

3rd child

> during Venus sub. BUT using the same analysis, I can't explain

emigration.

> Venus, as karyesh and as lord of 3rd and 10th, does not seem linked

to the

> 7th, 9th and 12th. Was it acting as samdharmi for someone or what??

> Obviously, childbirth when Ron was younger and ill health now he is

older

> makes a lot of sense. Still, why was there no illness around the

time his 3rd

> child was born? If not, this makes the system less foolproof, no?

> Should I go to my favorite books on medical astrology to figure out

the

> hernia, or are there special rules on this in your system I should

be

> applying?

>

> Krushna, where do you live in India?

>

> Many thanks and regards

> Christine

>

>

> DEAR CHRITINE,

> MY COMMENTS ARE IN CAPITALS

> KRUSHNA

>

>

> >XINEFOURNI@a...

> >

> >

> >Re: Krushna-Solution to

exercise ( with

> >theory)

> >Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:25:57 EST

> >

> >Dear Krushna and list members

> >

> >To test my understanding of the system, using Krushna's table of

numerical

> >strength in Ron's chart [trying at this point to understand

principles not

> >numbers]:

> >

> >Birth of 1st and 2nd children in Rahu sub in Sag = Jup

> >I look for B in 5th hse

> >Jupiter in 5th has 40 pts (SEE MERCURY IS ALSO HAVING 24 POINTS

LORD OF

> >'D')

> >Jupiter aspects A but it's irrelevant because this is Rahu's

period.

> >Rahu does NOT cast aspects. If he did then he would be

disqualified (NOT

> >DISQUALIFIED BUT SUCH PLANET DONOT GIVE RESULT ON ITS OWN ACCORD,

BUT GET

> >THE RESULT BY SOME SAMDHARMI, HERE RAHU IS SAMDHARMI TO JUPITER

AND ALSO

> >FOR MERCURY) WE DO NOT CONSIDER THE ASPECT OF RAHU.

> because

> >of his 5th aspect on C.

> >If these statements are correct, then Rahu is good for birth of

children,

> >if

> >not, I am missing the proper explanation RAHU CAN REPRESENT

jUPITER AND

> >MERCURY. SO CONCEPTION IS SUCH PERIOD IS POSSIBLE.

> >

> >Birth of 2nd child in Venus sub ( IT IS FOR 3RD CHILD, SECOND

SON )

> >I look for B in the 5th hse

> >Venus in 5th has 40 pts CORRECT

> >Venus does NOT aspect A, B or C

> >Venus sub gave a child CORRECT

> >

> >Eleventh house represents cash flow/income

> >There might be an adverse impact on cash flow during the sub of a

planet

> >with

> >12 or less points in the 4th hse [6th from 11th=debts, problems

in

> >general]THIS IS INVESTMENT NOT DEBTS

> >or in the 6th hse [8th from 11th=similar, but worse &

interruptionn in

> >earnings] or in the 10th hse [12th from 11th=excessive

expenditures, loss

> >of

> >cash flow]. SIXTH IS KARAK FOR 11TH HOUSE. IT IS SERVICE OR WORK

DONE GETS

> >ENCASHED.

> >

> >-4TH AS B as it relates to 11th= All planets have more than 12

pts. The

> >worse

> >3 are moon [14], mars [17] and saturn [18]. Moon sits in A hse,

but since

> >it's not an aspect, it is not disqualified. Mars is not

disqualified, and

> >as

> >lord of E is eager to act. Saturn aspects the B hse, so he is

disqualified.

> >So, this Moon and then Mars are the worse and not that bad with

14 and 17

> >pts, respectively, meaning there will be little debt incurrence

and

> >related

> >cash flow problems, even during their subs?

> >

> >-6TH AS B as it relates to 11th= All planets have more than 12

pts., except

> >for Sun with 9 pts The worse 3 are Sun and then moon [18] and

saturn [18].

> >Sun is disqualified as he aspecs the B hse. Saturn is

disqualified as it

> >aspects the A hse . Moon is not disqualified and eager to act

because it

> >sits

> >in the E hse, but since it has 18 pts, it would NOT indicate

serious money

> >problems during his subs although a drop in income might be

expected

> >anyway,

> >moon having only 12 pts in the 11th hse.

> >

> >-10TH AS B as it relates to 11th= Saturn has 8pts, Moon has 9pts,

Sun has

> >14pts and Mars has 15pts. Moon aspects A and is disqualified,

none of the

> >others is disqualified and Saturn is eager to act as lord of D in

D. So

> >cash

> >flow problems could be expected, all due to expenses being

greater than

> >income, most particularly during saturn subs, and even more so

because it

> >has

> >only 13 pts in the 11th hse?

> >However, Mars would never be problematic during his subs income-

wise

> >because

> >he has 33pts in the 11th hse, far in excess of his 15pts in hse

10.

> >

> >Would it be appropriate to compare a weak sub in the 11th hse to

the same

> >sub

> >in the 10th or 6th hse to see whether a drop in earnings can be

expected?

> >YOUR THINKING IS ON CORRECT PATH. SATURN BEING LESS POINTS FOR

10TH WILL

> >INDICATE CHANGE OF JOB, LEAVING THE JOB, SITTING IDEAL WITH OUT

ANY JOB,

> >(IT WILL ACT CONTRA TO JUPITER)

> >

> >PLEASE, tell me if the reasoning is sound so far, before I go on

this path.

> >ALSO, I have a feeling from your explanations in " solution to

exercise " ,

> >that

> >Sanjay's answers in the exercise may not be 100% correct in non-

longevity

> >cases. So, please, could you review his and Margarita's exercises

and my

> >questions re same when you have a chance. I WILL READ THEIR

FINDINGS AND

> >THEN COMMENTS

> >

> >Regards and many thanks for this truly exciting view of jyotish

you are

> >offering your students.

> >Christine

>

>

____________________

___

> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at

http://www.hotmail.com.

>

>

>

>