Complete analysis

[Guest guest]

Respected Krushna,

I have been trying to catch up with all the correspondance on Ron's chart

but it comes in quicker than I can keep up with.

I will not give the answers to the exercise set earlier although I have done

it. The answers ahve been given several times already and it seems pointless

just to repeat them. I have however been looking at the the analysis of

Ron's chart for his marriage, the separation, and the birth of the children.

My reasoniong does not seem to be exactly the same as the others so perhaps

you could look at it and tell me if it is acceptable. I have also added a

couple of questions at the end.

Ron's Marriage. House 7 = B

Using house 7 as B I got Ju=30 points Venus 23, Mercury 19 and Mars 18.

Me and Venus both aspect house B and are disqualified but Ju and Mars are

both suitable for the marriage. Looking first at the sub-periond of Ju I

find the first to be at age 10 and obviously too early, the second sub is

not then until the age of 43 which even by western standards is to delayed

in spite of the fact that Ju is aspected by Sa. Looking at Mars the first

sub is at age 6 ( too earlt ) and the next is from 8th Feb 1960 until 14th

Jan 1960, this would make him 24/25 years of age which is very suitable. I

would there expect the marriage to be peformed in this sub-period. It was in

fact peformed 7th Oct 1960.

Separation. House 6 = B

Although someone else suggested using 2nd house for this event I felt that

the 6th would be better as it is 12th to the 7th indication loss of long

term relationship. I did in fact look at the 2nd house also and although the

actual points differed the ranking of the planets in points order was

identical for both houses. For house 6 the points were Ju=42, Sa=31,Me=26.

Ju is disqualified as it aspects house C. Rahu can act as sandharmi to Ju

and so I would expect Ra sub to indicate the separation. As Ra is sandharmi

to Ju which is the most powerful planet on the chart I would expect it to

give protection to the marriage and thus the separation is not permanent.

I am not happy about this one as although the separation was not long it was

definately a malefic event and as such I am not sure whether I should have

been using the highest point scorer or the lowest.

Birth of Children House 5 = B

Using house 5 as B the points were Ju=40, Sa = 25, Venus =24, Me = 24. With

Ju having maximum points at 40 and also being the main Karaka for children

this was the obvious choice however it is disqualified due to an aspect top

house A. Both Ra and Venus can act as sandharmi to Ju so this is where I

would look first. The first sub after the marriage is that of Ra and as this

is the most likely time for child birth I would expect the first child to be

born in this sub which was from 14th Jan 1961 to 9th June 1963. The first

daughter was actually born 8th Feb 1962.

The first son was actually born in a Sa sub-period and I could find nothing

to tie in this with the birth of a child particularly as Sa is disqualifed

by aspecting house C. The 2nd son was born in a Venus sub and as Venus is

sandharmi to Ju this could be expected. This particular sub is also the

first suitable sub-period after the birth of the 2nd child so again it is

quite suitable.

 

Comments on the above would be appreciated Mr Krushna and I have one

question. Could you please give me a fuller explanation regarding Ra/ Ke

acting as sandharmi. Several people said that Ra would be sandharmi to Ju

and I take it that this was because Ra was in Sagittarius which is ruled by

Ju. You stated that Ke represented Me, I take it that this is because it is

in Gemini which is ruled by Mercury. I also think that Ra would be sandharmi

to Ve because they are in the same sign and house in the navamsa and that

Ra could be sandharmi to Ke as Ke is the a constellation ruled by Ra (

Ardra).

 

Yours trespectfully,

Peter

I will now continue to try and catch up on all the other mail over Chrismas.

[Guest guest]

Respected Peterji,

Pranam,

I appreciate the hard work you are doing to learn this system.

I will put my comments in Capital and in bracket near to the point.

krushna

 

 

> " Peter Sutcliffe " <petermay

>

>

>Re: Complete analysis

>Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:11:41 +1000

>

>Respected Krushna,

>I have been trying to catch up with all the correspondance on Ron's chart

>but it comes in quicker than I can keep up with.

>I will not give the answers to the exercise set earlier although I have

>done

>it. The answers ahve been given several times already and it seems

>pointless

>just to repeat them. I have however been looking at the the analysis of

>Ron's chart for his marriage, the separation, and the birth of the

>children.

>My reasoniong does not seem to be exactly the same as the others so perhaps

>you could look at it and tell me if it is acceptable. I have also added a

>couple of questions at the end.

>Ron's Marriage. House 7 = B

>Using house 7 as B I got Ju=30 ( CORRECT, BUT AFTER CONSIDERING AGAIN THE

>SIGHT OF 12TH LORD FROM HOUSE B I.E. SATURN IT COMES TO 23) points Venus

>23, Mercury 19 (IT SHOULD BE 7 AFTER CONSIDERING THE POINTS GAINED BY THE

>SIGHT OF SATURN BEING 12TH LORD FROM HOUSE B ) and Mars 18(IT SHOULD BE 23,

>YOU MAY NOT HAVE CONSIDERED THE SIGHT OF JUPITER).

>Me and Venus both aspect house B and are disqualified but Ju and Mars are

>both suitable for the marriage.( HERE JUPITER IS WITH 23, MARS WITH 23,

>VENUS WITH 23, SUN WITH 19, MOON WITH 18, SATURN WITH 9 AND MERCURY WITH 7

>ONLY. HERE MARS IS MORE EAGER TO GIVE THE MARRIAGE. ) Looking first at the

>sub-periond of Ju I

>find the first to be at age 10 and obviously too early, the second sub is

>not then until the age of 43 which even by western standards is to delayed

>in spite of the fact that Ju is aspected by Sa. Looking at Mars the first

>sub is at age 6 ( too earlt ) and the next is from 8th Feb 1960 until 14th

>Jan 1960, this would make him 24/25 years of age which is very suitable. I

>would there expect the marriage to be peformed in this sub-period. It was

>in

>fact peformed 7th Oct 1960.

>Separation. House 6 = B (THIS WAS NOT A SEPERATION, TEMP LIVING AT

>DIFFERENT PLACES (VIYOG) THE MERCURY GIVES ONLY 7 POINTS, SO IT HAVE

>SEPRATED THEM MERCURY = KETU = RAHU.) Although someone else suggested

>using 2nd house for this event I felt that

>the 6th would be better as it is 12th to the 7th indication loss of long

>term relationship. I did in fact look at the 2nd house also and although

>the

>actual points differed the ranking of the planets in points order was

>identical for both houses. For house 6 the points were Ju=42, Sa=31,Me=26.

>Ju is disqualified as it aspects house C. Rahu can act as sandharmi to Ju

>and so I would expect Ra sub to indicate the separation. As Ra is sandharmi

>to Ju which is the most powerful planet on the chart I would expect it to

>give protection to the marriage and thus the separation is not permanent.

>I am not happy about this one as although the separation was not long it

>was

>definately a malefic event and as such I am not sure whether I should have

>been using the highest point scorer or the lowest.

>Birth of Children House 5 = B

>Using house 5 as B the points were Ju=40, Sa = 25, Venus =24, Me = 24. With

>Ju having maximum points at 40 and also being the main Karaka for children

>this was the obvious choice however it is disqualified due to an aspect top

>house A. Both Ra and Venus can act as sandharmi to Ju so this is where I

>would look first. The first sub after the marriage is that of Ra and as

>this

>is the most likely time for child birth (THE LORD OF HOUSE D AND E HERE ARE

>MERCURY AND VENUS, AND MERCURY IS REPRESENTED BY RAHU AND KETU, THE

>CONCEPTION IS IN THIS PERIOD ONLY, AND OR THE POWERFUL SIGNIFICATOR) I

>would expect the first child to be

>born in this sub which was from 14th Jan 1961 to 9th June 1963. The first

>daughter was actually born 8th Feb 1962.

>The first son was actually born in a Sa sub-period and I could find

>nothing

>to tie in this with the birth of a child particularly as Sa is disqualifed

>by aspecting house C. The 2nd son was born in a Venus sub and as Venus is

>sandharmi to Ju this could be expected. This particular sub is also the

>first suitable sub-period after the birth of the 2nd child so again it is

>quite suitable. ( FOR CONSIDERING THE CHILDREN WE MUST TAKE IT AS

>CONCEPTION, ACTUAL BIRTH IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED. HERE ALL THE THREE ARE IN

>LINE WITH THE SYSTEM)

>

>Comments on the above would be appreciated Mr Krushna and I have one

>question. Could you please give me a fuller explanation regarding Ra/ Ke

>acting as sandharmi. Several people said that Ra would be sandharmi to Ju

>and I take it that this was because Ra was in Sagittarius which is ruled by

>Ju. You stated that Ke represented Me, I take it that this is because it is

>in Gemini which is ruled by Mercury. I also think that Ra would be

>sandharmi

>to Ve because they are in the same sign and house in the navamsa and that

>Ra could be sandharmi to Ke as Ke is the a constellation ruled by Ra (

>Ardra).( CORRECT)

>(I HOPE THIS WILL CLEAR ALL THE POINTS. )

>Yours trespectfully,

>Peter

>I will now continue to try and catch up on all the other mail over

>Chrismas.

>THANKS

KRUSHNA

>

>

>