Guest guest Posted January 28, 2001 Report Share Posted January 28, 2001 Dear Krushna and Ron Somehow I was not happy with the Queen's chart, using the official birthtime of 1:40 GMT. I looked around and found that Vinay Aditya, in his book, uses a birthtime of 1:48 GMT for the Queen, which gives her an early Capricorn asc., a Yogkarak Venus and 39 bindus in the 11TH Hse., among other things. I am sending Vinay an e-mail re same, but Krushna might want to look at the birthtime also. Regards Christine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2001 Report Share Posted January 28, 2001 On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 22:03:12 EST, you wrote: Christine, Krushna & members, I chose the Queen because of the observed birth time. However, I note that with Krushna's ayanamsa the Ascendant is 29 Sag 34 which puts it in the doubtful zone. I haven't looked at her chart since converting from Tropical so I was not aware of the potential problem. Perhaps Krushna might like to look at the Queen's events. If they tally with a Sag Ascendant we could go ahead. It would be nice to know anyhow. Krushna, I do have data on other Royals: and also have an advance copy of the latest Astrodatabank where I can obtain good data if someone else is preferred. Ron Gaunt >Dear Krushna and Ron > >Somehow I was not happy with the Queen's chart, using the official birthtime >of 1:40 GMT. I looked around and found that Vinay Aditya, in his book, uses a >birthtime of 1:48 GMT for the Queen, which gives her an early Capricorn asc., > a Yogkarak Venus and 39 bindus in the 11TH Hse., among other things. I am >sending Vinay an e-mail re same, but Krushna might want to look at the >birthtime also. > >Regards >Christine > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2001 Report Share Posted January 29, 2001 Dear Ron, Krushna, Christine and group - I chose the Queen because of the observed birth time. However, I note that with Krushna's ayanamsa the Ascendant is 29 Sag 34 which puts it in the doubtful zone. I haven't looked at her chart since converting from Tropical so I was not aware of the potential problem. Perhaps Krushna might like to look at the Queen's events. If they tally with a Sag Ascendant we could go ahead. It would be nice to know anyhow. I defintely agree with Ron's idea of having more study charts in order to practice on, but getting from textbooks sort of puts them in the "iffy" zone as is indicated by this particular chart for instance of the Queen. Perhaps it might be less frustrating if we choose charts that we're pretty sure of the birth time on, and that we choose from our own collections. Just my thoughts on this . . . Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2001 Report Share Posted January 29, 2001 Dear Ron The birth time 1:40 seems to be more correct, sag. ascendent more suits the events of the life. If you have more charts, with confirmed birth time, we will take one by one, for our study purpose. thanks krushna >Ron Gaunt <arjee > > >Re: A Exercise--Ron and Krushna >Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:11:22 +1100 > >On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 22:03:12 EST, you wrote: > >Christine, Krushna & members, > >I chose the Queen because of the observed birth time. However, >I note that with Krushna's ayanamsa the Ascendant is 29 Sag 34 >which puts it in the doubtful zone. I haven't looked at her >chart since converting from Tropical so I was not aware of the >potential problem. Perhaps Krushna might like to look at >the Queen's events. If they tally with a Sag Ascendant we could >go ahead. It would be nice to know anyhow. > >Krushna, I do have data on other Royals: and also have an >advance copy of the latest Astrodatabank where I can obtain good >data if someone else is preferred. > >Ron Gaunt > > > >Dear Krushna and Ron > > > >Somehow I was not happy with the Queen's chart, using the official >birthtime > >of 1:40 GMT. I looked around and found that Vinay Aditya, in his book, >uses a > >birthtime of 1:48 GMT for the Queen, which gives her an early Capricorn >asc., > > a Yogkarak Venus and 39 bindus in the 11TH Hse., among other things. I >am > >sending Vinay an e-mail re same, but Krushna might want to look at the > >birthtime also. > > > >Regards > >Christine > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2001 Report Share Posted January 29, 2001 Dear Cristine, I feel that birth time 1:40 is more correct. krushna >XINEFOURNI > > >Re: A Exercise--Ron and Krushna >Sun, 28 Jan 2001 22:03:12 EST > >Dear Krushna and Ron > >Somehow I was not happy with the Queen's chart, using the official >birthtime >of 1:40 GMT. I looked around and found that Vinay Aditya, in his book, uses >a >birthtime of 1:48 GMT for the Queen, which gives her an early Capricorn >asc., > a Yogkarak Venus and 39 bindus in the 11TH Hse., among other things. I >am >sending Vinay an e-mail re same, but Krushna might want to look at the >birthtime also. > >Regards >Christine _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.