Guest guest Posted February 2, 2001 Report Share Posted February 2, 2001 To: Krushna,Samjay,Sandy,Donna and Ron, I hav just done a study and comparison of Tables produced by worsheet Ver 4.08. The reasults are shown in the Ms Word attachment. Peter Namaste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2001 Report Share Posted February 2, 2001 RESPECTED PETERJI, REALY I MUST APPRECIATE YOUR EFFORTS AND ZEAL FOR LEARNING THE SUBJECT. I WILL CHECK POINTS CALCULATED BY ME. I AGREE I MAY MAKE SOME MISTAKE, DUE TO DOING THE THINGS IN HURRY, TO UTILISE THE AVAILABLE TIME. DIFFERENCE OF ONE POINT IN THE FINAL STRENGTH, MAY BE DUE TO SOME DIFFERENCE IN THE BASIC ASTAKVARG TABLE. SOME TIME I HAVE ALSO POINTED OUT SOME PLANETS DIFFERS BY ONE POINT IN THEIR ASTAKVARG FOR SOME HOUSES. IF THE DIFFERENCE IS MORE, IT MAY BE MY MISTAKE, NOT CONSIDERING SOME EFFECTS, SUCH AS 12TH LORD OR THE SIGHT OF THE PLANETS. I WILL CHECK IT, I AM GOING OUT, AND WILL TAKE PRINT OUT OF YOUR TABLES AND MINE, I WILL GET AMPLE TIME TO CHECK IT. I AM OUT FROM 6TH FEB TO 16TH FEB. SO ON 17TH I WILL GIVE THE RESULT. THANK YOU KRUSHNA > " Peter Sutcliffe " <petermay > > >Re: To Krushna, Sandy,Donna, & Sanjay >Sat, 3 Feb 2001 14:42:45 +1000 > >To: >Krushna,Samjay,Sandy,Donna and Ron, > >I hav just done a study and comparison of Tables produced by worsheet Ver >4.08. The reasults are shown in the Ms Word attachment. > >Peter >Namaste ><< ComparisonwithKrushna.doc >> _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2001 Report Share Posted February 2, 2001 Dear Peter, I have checked the data in my sheet. Yes, my sheet gives the values that you have mentioned. After your message, I took a quick look at the logic of the sheet and found no mistake. Mistakes in the program could come from the following sources: 1. It is not calculating the AV properly. - To check against this, I verified the values that I was getting using Goravani software and putting the AV preference to Varahamira. The values generated by my sheet tally with this for all the charts that I have done so far, which is about 35-40. I would say that there is a high level of confidence that it is calculating the AV correctly. 2. It is not picking up the points of the houses correctly. - I have checked this against several charts which I had done manually and I am reasonable confident that there is no mistake. However, if anyone finds a mistake, please let me know. 3. It is not picking up the D and E lords and the planets in D and E with more than 4 points correctly. - Again, I checked this by doing manual inspection of the chart and it seems to be doing this accurately. 4. It is not picking up the correct planets aspecting A B or C. - My checks show me that it picks these up correctly. 5. It is not calculating the planetary aspects correctly. - I have again checked this. This is very easy to check and I did not find any mistake. 6. It is not making proper selection of 12th lord points, or the other rules informed so far. - I again checked this I find that I have covered all these. The only thing which is not covered is that Krushnaji says that if Sun or Moon are 12th lords, there positive points can still be counted. My worksheet does not yet distinguish between these and the other planets . I had informed every one about this when I posted the sheet. However, this is not relevant for Arjee's sheet because the Sun and Moon are not contributing any positive aspect points or 12th house points in his chart. I think the worksheet is easy to check because the points mentioned in each sheet and the steps are visible to everyone. It is possible that Krushnaji uses some other rules which we are not yet aware of. However, I don't think he would do that. I can only say that we should all request him to use the sheet and do some test calculations against his manual calculation. Then we can be sure that we are not missing anything. Thanks Peter, for doing so much work on this. We really need to resolve it. If there are any mistakes in the sheet, I need to correct these but I need to know what these are, first. I think it is worth doing that because a correct worksheet makes the calculations a snap. Sanjay - " Peter Sutcliffe " <petermay Saturday, February 03, 2001 11:42 AM Re: To Krushna, Sandy,Donna, & Sanjay To: Krushna,Samjay,Sandy,Donna and Ron, I hav just done a study and comparison of Tables produced by worsheet Ver 4.08. The reasults are shown in the Ms Word attachment. Peter Namaste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2001 Report Share Posted February 3, 2001 RESPECTED PETERJI, I have checked the discrepancies, and found that your calculations are correct. I have made calculations manually, so some mistakes in calculations, some mistake are occured in typing. I have checked some of the points shown in red, your figures are correct. Only Saturn for 5th house I found difference of one point. But I am not confident, I have checked oraly, so your figure may be correct. your figures are certified by mr Sanjay, so those must be correct. I have not used the worksheets till today, now seeing the actual results, and its accuracy, I should also follow the same. You have given an example about marriage, or job or any thing, If it is for the event already happened, then it cant tally with such points. Yes it may be wrong if we are talking about future event. In such case there will be two answer, so one answer must be wrong. It will be of the person who made the mistake. No manupulation is possible in answer. I do not think that the sub period of any person will differ. There may be some difference of opinion only with the transit of the sun. There may be more then one instances which may give the transit of the sun for fixing the date of the event. So possibility for difference of the date of the event may be there, and that difference will not be more then two three months. Any how I am much happy with Sanjay and his hard work. It is only his effort, we are getting such a good work sheet, which will help in getting correct result. Realy speaking I was not serious about the work sheet till today. But today I have got the full confidence on the worksheet. krushna , " Peter Sutcliffe " <petermay@p...> wrote: > To: > Krushna,Samjay,Sandy,Donna and Ron, > > I hav just done a study and comparison of Tables produced by worsheet Ver 4.08. The reasults are shown in the Ms Word attachment. > > Peter > Namaste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2001 Report Share Posted February 3, 2001 Thanks Sanjay, I had done most of the manual checks myself before putting my results for you to see so I am not surprised that you found them correct but I am not sure where the mistakes are coming from. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2001 Report Share Posted February 3, 2001 Respected Krushna, Thank you for your very rapid checking of the calculations. It is also pleasing to know that the worksheet is giving almost the correct results ( there are a couple of thing which Sanjay has still to add). We can now all use the worksheet with confidence. Peter Namaste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.