Guest guest Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 why almost everybody forget that the life of the sage is also the teaching? why minimalize an act of total nobless like the way this man died, an act that puts him in the family of sages whose acts touch so deeply a heart? why hurry on so easily to cover everything under the theory of not doing and the nonexistence of ego? , " yosyx " <yosyflug wrote: > > > > the apparent actions of a " mentsh " , a fully integrated > human being, like maharaj, are such only in the view > of identifying observers. since a sage is devoid of > feeling of identity or doership, what appears as his/her > act is a natual reality's response, arising according to > time, place, and the need. > > any evaluations or judgements of such acts are merely > reflexions of the observer's illusory identifications and > self image. > > _()_ > yosy > , " makalm " <makalm@> wrote: > > > > Dear Michael, > > > > I think that the point that Maharaj is making is that if we > identify > > ourselves with our bodies and minds we see ourselves and other > > people as doers of things. Then immediately we judge what they do > as > > right or wrong, according our concepts. That is why they say > > that " distiction between right and worng, good and evil is the > > sickness of human mind... " > > > > When they asked Maharaj what would " he " do if someone attaked him, > > he replied, " I don't know. " His body may fight or his body may > > flight or freeze or just sit and pray. In my opinion, once you > > investigate who is this " I " that seems to do heroic or cowardly > acts > > your understand that there is no doer, things are just happenings > > and there is no " you " to do right or wrong - no " ego " in me and > > no " ego " in others and you can stop judging yourself and others > > according to your ego's preferences. > > Respectfully in Ramana, > > Mila > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 Dear Viorica thank you for your email and thank you for sharing "my" view.... in love in GD michael bindel - viorica_weissman Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:40 AM Re: A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE OF LIVED SPIRITUALITY why almost everybody forget that the life of the sage is also the teaching? why minimalize an act of total nobless like the way this man died, an act that puts him in the family of sages whose acts touch so deeply a heart? why hurry on so easily to cover everything under the theory of not doing and the nonexistence of ego? , "yosyx" <yosyflug wrote:>> > > the apparent actions of a "mentsh", a fully integrated > human being, like maharaj, are such only in the view > of identifying observers. since a sage is devoid of > feeling of identity or doership, what appears as his/her > act is a natual reality's response, arising according to > time, place, and the need. > > any evaluations or judgements of such acts are merely > reflexions of the observer's illusory identifications and > self image. > > _()_> yosy> > > > > > > > , "makalm" <makalm@> wrote:> >> > Dear Michael,> > > > I think that the point that Maharaj is making is that if we > identify > > ourselves with our bodies and minds we see ourselves and other > > people as doers of things. Then immediately we judge what they do > as > > right or wrong, according our concepts. That is why they say > > that "distiction between right and worng, good and evil is the > > sickness of human mind..." > > > > When they asked Maharaj what would "he" do if someone attaked him, > > he replied, "I don't know." His body may fight or his body may > > flight or freeze or just sit and pray. In my opinion, once you > > investigate who is this "I" that seems to do heroic or cowardly > acts > > your understand that there is no doer, things are just happenings > > and there is no "you" to do right or wrong - no "ego" in me and > > no "ego" in others and you can stop judging yourself and others > > according to your ego's preferences. > > Respectfully in Ramana,> > Mila> > __________ Informazione NOD32 2009 (20070126) __________Questo messaggio è stato controllato dal Sistema Antivirus NOD32http://www.nod32.it__________'>http://www.nod32.it__________ Informazione NOD32 2009 (20070126) __________Questo messaggio è stato controllato dal Sistema Antivirus NOD32http://www.nod32.it Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.6.1/776 - Release 25/04/2007 12.19__________ Informazione NOD32 2009 (20070126) __________Questo messaggio h stato controllato dal Sistema Antivirus NOD32http://www.nod32.it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 , " viorica_weissman " <viorica_weissman wrote: > > why almost everybody forget that the life of the sage is also the > teaching? a wo/man's life is his her message. this is not a matter of rememberance, but an obvious fact. and it has nothing to do with 'sage' or 'ignorant' or any such artificial divisions. this is true for all always. why minimalize an act of total nobless like the way this > man died, an act that puts him in the family of sages whose acts > touch so deeply a heart? why hurry on so easily to cover everything > under the theory of not doing and the nonexistence of ego? > what theory do you speak about? recommend you re-read some ramanaji, viorika, and, leaving speculations aside, observe and realize directly what/how it really is... the one and only undeniable self is not personal. > > , " yosyx " <yosyflug@> wrote: > > > > > > > > the apparent actions of a " mentsh " , a fully integrated > > human being, like maharaj, are such only in the view > > of identifying observers. since a sage is devoid of > > feeling of identity or doership, what appears as his/her > > act is a natual reality's response, arising according to > > time, place, and the need. > > > > any evaluations or judgements of such acts are merely > > reflexions of the observer's illusory identifications and > > self image. > > > > _()_ > > yosy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " makalm " <makalm@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Michael, > > > > > > I think that the point that Maharaj is making is that if we > > identify > > > ourselves with our bodies and minds we see ourselves and other > > > people as doers of things. Then immediately we judge what they > do > > as > > > right or wrong, according our concepts. That is why they say > > > that " distiction between right and worng, good and evil is the > > > sickness of human mind... " > > > > > > When they asked Maharaj what would " he " do if someone attaked > him, > > > he replied, " I don't know. " His body may fight or his body may > > > flight or freeze or just sit and pray. In my opinion, once you > > > investigate who is this " I " that seems to do heroic or cowardly > > acts > > > your understand that there is no doer, things are just > happenings > > > and there is no " you " to do right or wrong - no " ego " in me and > > > no " ego " in others and you can stop judging yourself and others > > > according to your ego's preferences. > > > Respectfully in Ramana, > > > Mila > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.