Guest guest Posted May 6, 2007 Report Share Posted May 6, 2007 >Namaste, >Ramana also said the the same book, that sat-cit-ananda are 'qualities', which to my mind is the same as an attribute. >Ramana like Sankara only ever really talked about The Self or Saguna Brahman, for Nir Guna is unimaginable and raises >the fear of extinction in people...So why bother talking about something they cannot grasp..Tony. Yes, why talk Alan From The S'rîmad Devî Bhâgawatam 13. O blessed one! That Purusa and Prakriti pervade everywhere and exist in all the things; in this Universe nothing can exist without the presence of both of them. 14. Both of them are the highest intelligent self, nirguna (free from all material qualities), without any tinge of impurity, and undecaying. The one form that is a combination of these two is always to be meditated in the heart. 15. What is S’akti (energy) is the Highest Self; what is the Highest Self is the Highest S’akti. O Nârada! Nobody can ascertain the subtle difference between these two. 16. O Nârada! Merely the study of all the S’âstras and the Vedas with their Amgas without renunciation does not enable one to ascertain the difference between these two. 17. O Child! This whole universe, moving and non-moving, comes out of Ahamkâra (egoism). How can one ascertain the above difference even if he tries for one hundred kalpas, unless one frees oneself from Ahamkâra. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.