Guest guest Posted March 7, 2002 Report Share Posted March 7, 2002 Let me preface this by saying that I've seen no proof of any of the allegations in the letter below. I found the letter online (I have no proof of it's authenticity, though no reason to doubt it) and I was wondering if anyone knows if PETA did contribute money to ELF or ALF. ----------------- March 4, 2002 Ms. Ingrid Newkirk President PETA 501 Front Street Norfolk, Virginia 23510 Dear Ms. Newkirk: When the House Resources Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health held an oversight hearing probing the increasing threat of ecoterrorism on National Forest lands last month, evidence was submitted by one of the Subcommittee's witnesses showing that the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) contributed to the Earth Liberation Front, the public face of an organization described by the FBI as America's single largest domestic terrorism threat. The purpose of the contribution to ELF is listed on PETA's Form 990 tax return as to " support their program activities. " Subsequent reporting in the media appears to substantiate these allegations. As a non-profit organization with tax-exempt privileges and the incumbent public policy obligations that status entails, PETA has a responsibility to explain the full extent of its involvement with and contributions to environmental terror groups like ELF and ALF. With that in mind, I respectfully request that you respond to the following questions, the answers to which will be made part of the hearing's public record. · Since 1993, how much and on how many occasions has PETA made financial contributions to either the Earth Liberation Front and/or its press office, the Animal Liberation Front and/or its press office, and suspected or convicted persons associated with ELF and ALF? · Does PETA have any internal policies or guidelines either encouraging or discouraging financial support of unlawful groups like ELF and ALF? If so, what are they? · Under what rational did PETA make a contribution(s) to ELF? · What steps did PETA take to ensure that these funds would not be used for unlawful purposes? · Whose signature appeared on the returned check that PETA gave ELF? · Does PETA condone the violent activities of organizations like ELF? Should PETA's contribution to ELF be seen as an endorsement? · Does PETA have any intention of contributing to ELF, ALF or other similarly motivated groups in the future? As local, state and federal law enforcement officials grapple with this formidable threat, careful scrutiny must be applied to any and all persons or organizations that lend financial aid and comfort to this radical band of extremists. In the future, I hope that PETA will cut-off its financial ties with ELF and ALF, and join America's largest mainstream environmental groups in publicly condemning these and other eco-terrorist groups. I look forward to your response. Sincerely, Scott McInnis Chairman House Resources Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health cc: Internal Revenue Service Federal Bureau of Investigation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2002 Report Share Posted March 7, 2002 Well, what I have to add here is just hearsay, but... what *I* heard was that PETA contributed to them in order to help someone's legal fund - apparently somebody threw tofu at someone else (a police officer?), and is in big trouble. As my source said, " It must have been very FIRM tofu! " , Soy boy <soyboyincali> wrote: > Let me preface this by saying that I've seen no proof of any of the > allegations in the letter below. I found the letter online (I have no proof > of it's authenticity, though no reason to doubt it) and I was wondering if > anyone knows if PETA did contribute money to ELF or ALF. > > ----------------- > March 4, 2002 > > Ms. Ingrid Newkirk > President > PETA > 501 Front Street > Norfolk, Virginia 23510 > > Dear Ms. Newkirk: > When the House Resources Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health held > an oversight hearing probing the increasing threat of ecoterrorism on > National Forest lands last month, evidence was submitted by one of the > Subcommittee's witnesses showing that the People for the Ethical > Treatment of Animals (PETA) contributed to the Earth Liberation Front, the > public > face of an organization described by the FBI as America's single > largest domestic terrorism threat. The purpose of the contribution to ELF > is > listed on PETA's Form 990 tax return as to " support their program > activities. " Subsequent reporting in the media appears to substantiate > these allegations. > > As a non-profit organization with tax-exempt privileges and the > incumbent public policy obligations that status entails, PETA has a > responsibility to explain the full extent of its involvement with and > contributions to > environmental terror groups like ELF and ALF. With that in mind, I > respectfully request that you respond to the following questions, the > answers to which will be made part of the hearing's public record. > > · Since 1993, how much and on how many occasions has PETA made > financial contributions to either the Earth Liberation Front and/or its > press office, the Animal Liberation Front and/or its press office, and > suspected or convicted persons associated with ELF and ALF? > > · Does PETA have any internal policies or guidelines either > encouraging or discouraging financial support of unlawful groups like > ELF and ALF? If so, what are they? > > · Under what rational did PETA make a contribution(s) to ELF? > > · What steps did PETA take to ensure that these funds would not > be used for unlawful purposes? > > · Whose signature appeared on the returned check that PETA gave > ELF? > > · Does PETA condone the violent activities of organizations like > ELF? Should PETA's contribution to ELF be seen as an endorsement? > > · Does PETA have any intention of contributing to ELF, ALF or > other similarly motivated groups in the future? > As local, state and federal law enforcement officials grapple with this > > formidable threat, careful scrutiny must be applied to any and all > persons or organizations that lend financial aid and comfort to this radical > band of extremists. In the future, I hope that PETA will cut-off its > financial ties with ELF and ALF, and join America's largest mainstream > environmental groups in publicly condemning these and other eco-terrorist > groups. > I look forward to your response. > > Sincerely, > Scott McInnis > Chairman > House Resources Subcommittee on > Forests and Forest Health > > cc: Internal Revenue Service > Federal Bureau of Investigation > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2002 Report Share Posted March 9, 2002 Hi all. This from my sweetie, who recognized Scott McInnis' name from some years ago when he was living in Colorado. He asked me to forward this to the list. Feel free to reply to him in private. Janice ---------- david grace <davidpgrace Fri, 8 Mar 2002 00:41:41 -0800 (PST) gata Re: PETA contributions to ELF & ALF (not the tv show) Hi Janice, When I saw this I had to laugh at the poor fool, Rep. McInnis, who could lose his fat government paycheck and cushy job, by scaring animal lovers on company time. How much of the government budget does he expect to spend on going after these animal lovers - declaring them to be the greatest threat of domestic terrorists in America? It reminds me of the ADL scandal of a decade ago, when unions, day-care activists and Food Not Bombs were listed among the dangers lurking in America's heartland. Rep. McIinnis is from the 3rd District of Colorado. I ran for that seat when I lived there, and although I don't think the Green Party can win there yet, as it is a monsterously big district, the Dems would be glad to win it back. It is a district that ebbs and flows with tight races, and Greens can spoil Dems as easy as Repubs. If PETA people were to display this shameful version of McCarthyism to the good people of the 3rd Dist, that rat would have a tough time getting small contributions again. Specifically, at the end of the letter he cc's the slander to the FBI and the IRS. Coloradians tend to be a bright, but poor, bunch of people. They have to barter and scrape a lot, and everybody has tax problems lurking. If their own Congressman is a rat and a snitch to the IRS, he will lose just enough votes to the Dems. I suggest you recommend to PETA people they spotlight the economic forces they are opposing. The big corporations, who get tax-breaks by tormenting small creatures. Lean on the reasons why corporations 'need' to do animal research and how the taxpayers foot the bill. The right strategy used to whittle away at his small contributions base, McIinnis would be forced to accept larger and larger contributions from Corporations, and as many Coloradians know, few if any corporations are based in Colorado. Nothing pisses them off worse than to know their Congressman is taking money from outsiders - especially since the outsiders always leave the state with a hefty bill. I think I'll get a kick out of working on this one. I always had a fondness for my time there in Appleton and Mack. I still dream of the orchard life... Love, David Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.