Guest guest Posted March 21, 2002 Report Share Posted March 21, 2002 You have received this ABCNEWS.com mail from: lauren grinnysmom I thought you might find this story interesting. Did Meat Eating Help Shape Society? http://abcnews.go.com/sections/scitech/DyeHard/dyehard.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2002 Report Share Posted March 21, 2002 For those interested, this sci/tech piece on ABCNEWS.com is not a good example of recent scholarship in archaeology. It's sad that the general public would see this snapshot of one man's weak theory. Michael Alvard is making a big assumption based on *his* observations of one isolated group of people. Culture, organized society, teamwork and cooperation were not developed or created by males who hunted. Both females *and* males created culture by doing what they did best: making and gestating infants, birthing and nursing infants, raising the infants to maturity, gathering plant foods, finding water and safe places to sleep, and protecting and defending individuals, homes, and the group. It has been proven time and time again that the first humans ate an almost exclusively herbivorous diet. On almost all continents, the archaeological record shows that between 80-90% of all calories came from gathering (not hunting) and that animal flesh (often that of insects) represented a rare and sometimes ceremonial contribution to the diet. Of course gathering was predominately a female activity (in *some* human groups) - and thus in the past many male archaeologists played up and even falsified the hunting role of males. Contemporary scholarship (with the new inclusion of female archaeologists) could not continue to ignore the strong evidence suggesting that early societies were " gatherers who sometimes hunted " and not " hunter/gatherers " . Simply put, the first humans relied on gathering, and the creation of society or *culture* was not limited to one gender. Most scholarship has focused on the role of the mother interacting with her infant and the new preference to walk upright - thus freeing hands to 1) carry infant 2) gather fruits, vegetables, roots and 3) signal to others in group. There is also limited scholarship looking at the role of menstruation (measuring time/moon cycles/mother blood) and its role in the creation of *culture* and its influence MUCH LATER on the blood rites of males who hunted (males would often mimic the female menstrual ceremonies before a hunt). Too bad Stanford University biologist, Paul R. Ehrlich, didn't have a more prominent voice in the ABC news piece. He is well-respected and has a better understanding of the current archaeological/biological evidence. Michael Alvard's theory doesn't hold up to scrutiny. > grinnysmom > Thu, 21 Mar 2002 08:52:58 -0800 (PST) > > [sFBAVeg] ABCNEWS.com: Did Meat Eating Help Shape Society? > > I thought you might find this story interesting. > > Did Meat Eating Help Shape Society? > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/scitech/DyeHard/dyehard.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.