Guest guest Posted July 7, 2002 Report Share Posted July 7, 2002 June 2002 Vol. 1 No. 6 Dairy Industry Admits They Sell Death While at the University of California at Davis, helping my youngest son with his housing plans for his sophomore year, I was wandering through the Food Sciences building looking for a bathroom, when I coincidentally found a wall mounted rack distributing dairy industry propaganda – a small magazine called the “California Dairy Dispatch – Research, Education and Service to Support the Dairy Industry” (Spring 2002). On page 6 they say, “Since dietary fat intake is known to contribute to obesity, heart disease, cancer, stroke and type 2 diabetes – conditions disproportionately high in the Hispanic population – switching to low-fat 1% milk would significantly reduce the fat intake while retaining the benefits of calcium, protein and vitamin D.” They got the disease part right, but what they seem to always fail to tell the consumer is the truth about nutrition – that 1% milk is still too high in fat. Based on the calories in milk this product is 23% fat – and almost all of that is the heart attack-producing, saturated fat.1 And 2% milk is 35% fat.1 Furthermore, the claimed benefits of calcium, protein, and vitamin D are largely untrue (see the McDougall Plan book). Even after their clear admission of full knowledge of the health hazards of their products, they continue to sell them without a warning label about all that deadly fat. Consider some of their other best-selling products: butter at 100% fat, cheese at 70% fat, and whole milk at 50% fat.1 The failure to properly warn the public of the dangers of their products will someday soon result in lawsuits similar to those that have been won against the tobacco industries. Reference: J Pennington. Bowes & Church’s Food Values of Portions Commonly Used. 17th Ed. Lippincott. Philadelphia- New York. 1998. 2002 John McDougall Equal rights for all species, human and non-human alike: Alfred Kuba ____________________ Dear friends, SBIDA no longer uses language that accepts the current concept of animals as property, commodities and/or things. Rather than refer to ourselves or others as " owners " of animals we share our lives with, we now refer to ourselves and others as " guardians " of our animal friends and to animals as " he " or " she " rather than " it. " Guardians do not buy or sell animals; instead they rescue and adopt. I urge you to do the same. www.VegSource.com www.pcrm.org www.peta.org www.idausa.org www.farmsanctuary.org www.sentientbeings.org www.GoVeganRadio.com Join South Bay In Defense of Animals by simply replying to this E-mail and type join on subject: You will receive Email alerts about demos and letter writing campaigns for animals. for the animals: Alfred Kuba bkind2animals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.