Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Veganism not Religion Court Ruling

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Yesterday in California, an appeals court ruled

against a vegan's lawsuit using religion as a defense.

Here is the article:

 

http://www.animalconcerns.org/external.html?www=http%3A//sfgate.com/cgi-bin/arti\

cle.cgi%3Ff%3D/c/a/2002/09/14/MN194306.DTL & itemid=200209141245200.475084

 

 

Apparently, Equalitarian religion is unknown. Our

primary religious principle is veganism. For more

information on Equalitarian religion, please visit our

website at www.allspecies.homestead.com

 

God Bless,

 

Jack Truman

Pastor

The Universal Equalitarian Church

'Where All Species are Created Equal'

www.allspecies.homestead.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

News - Today's headlines

http://news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jack truman wrote:

>Yesterday in California, an appeals court ruled

>against a vegan's lawsuit using religion as a defense.

>Here is the article:

>

>http://www.animalconcerns.org/external.html?www=http%3A//sfgate.com/cgi-bin/art\

icle.cgi%3Ff%3D/c/a/2002/09/14/MN194306.DTL & itemid=200209141245200.475084

>

>Apparently, Equalitarian religion is unknown. Our

>primary religious principle is veganism. For more

>information on Equalitarian religion, please visit our

>website at www.allspecies.homestead.com

 

Jack, do you think that the appellant would have been more successful in

this case if he had been an Equalitarian, rather than a vegan? Just because

Equalitarianism encompasses veganism does not make veganism a religion in

itself. For example, there are other religions that espouse vegetarianism,

but that does not make vegetarianism itself a religion. I do not believe

that veganism is a religion. In that respect, I agree with the judge.

However, I strongly believe that the appellant should have had the right to

object to the mandatory vaccination on grounds of veganism as a moral

philosophy. But I don't know if US law allows for any such objection.

Presumably not, given the appellants decision to appeal on religious,

rather than moral grounds.

 

Gerry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...