Guest guest Posted September 18, 2002 Report Share Posted September 18, 2002 I was shocked and disturbed to read in recent postings that some people say they feel strongly about veg'ism and animal rights and yet don't see a compelling reason for others to be vegetarian. I don't understand this at all. What are your own reasons for being vegetarian? Because you want to prevent animal suffering? Because you don't want to contribute to soil erosion, water pollution, and ozone depletion? Because you don't want to waste grain, water, land, and pesticides? Because you want to free up grain, water, and land (skip the pesticides) for people in need? Because slaughterhouses treat their workers almost as brutally as they treat animals? Ethical veg'ns clearly care about some or all of these and other issues enough to consider them every time they sit down to a meal. Therefore, if one cares about these issues, wouldn't it only be logical that one would want not only to make a positive contribution oneself, but also for the level of animal suffering, human suffering, and environmental suffering to be diminshed as much as possible? I just don't understand: You don't want a chicken to die for you, and yet it is ok with you for the same chicken to die for someone else? Each of us is only one person and, with our food choices, can make only a relatively minute difference each day in the lives of animals. Thus, if the goal is to make a dent in the number of animals killed, the number of waterways polluted, the number of pounds of grain wasted by being funnelled through animals, we need as many people as possible onboard as vegans--or, to be PC--as veg'ns. It seems to me that the more we care about these issues, the more imperative it is to us that others make the switch to plant-based eating for all the same reasons we ourselves did. _______________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2002 Report Share Posted September 18, 2002 Hello! I made that statement, and I since got some private mail about it as well. I evidently need to find a better balance between not flooding this list with long strident messages on the one hand, and on the other hand not providing sufficient context for my brief comments. OK, for the record: 1. I did not mean that I thought others should not be vegetarian. 2. I did not mean that there weren't reasons which compell ME, for them to be vegetarian. 3. I did not mean that it is ok with ME that animals are raised and suffer and are killed, eaten or vivisected. 4. It is a fact though, that what I think and $1.25 will buy you a cup of coffee. 5. It unfortunately doesn't matter at all in the scheme of things that I think everyone should be vegetarian, and should care about animals, and should care about environmental issues, and a host of other things. 6. What is compelling for me is not necessarily compelling for others. 7. The world is by and large filled with people who simply are not compelled, by animal suffering or pollution, to consider vegetarianism. Further many, if not most, are not able to even fathom the concept, let alone seriously consider it as a way of life. 8. I meant to differentiate between what we (vegetarians) want, and what is. I was, at the same time, not denigrating the possibility for change, but talking about my impression of our current reality, in the context of a discussion about the complexity of this issue. 9. I meant to agree with what I felt was the original writer's implicit message, that vegetarianism is a moral/ethical dillemma which is far more complicated and intractible than many of those who were upset by my simple comment wish it were. 10. Lastly, I think clarity is crucially important, and understanding how things really are is going to be far more useful in the long run than not being able to consider all sides of a problem for fear of not sounding 'team' enough. Whew! My personal view is that everyone on this list is more or less in agreement that vegetarianism and animal rights are good things, so I'd be willing to move on to other subjects before this red herring gets out of hand and my reputation for troublemaking gets any worse! Bruce > I was shocked and disturbed to read in recent postings that some > people say > they feel strongly about veg'ism and animal rights and yet don't see a > compelling reason for others to be vegetarian. I don't > understand this at > all. What are your own reasons for being vegetarian? Because you want to > prevent animal suffering? Because you don't want to contribute to soil > erosion, water pollution, and ozone depletion? Because you don't want to > waste grain, water, land, and pesticides? Because you want to > free up grain, > water, and land (skip the pesticides) for people in need? Because > slaughterhouses treat their workers almost as brutally as they treat > animals? -etc.- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.