Guest guest Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 [There have been some encouraging articles posted here recently about the alleged virtues of ethanol for fuel. Here’s the other side of the story.] STUMBLING TOWARDS GREEN FUEL Environmentalists Are Skeptical About Government Investment In Ethanol by EVE KRAKOW From Nov. 2 to 4, representatives from government and industry are meeting in Quebec City for the World Summit on Ethanol in Transportation to discuss ways to promote the use of ethanol fuel. Last week, the government of Canada launched a three-year, $100-million Ethanol Expansion Program, a component of its Climate Change Plan for Canada. The government's ultimate target: to have 35 per cent of our gasoline contain 10 per cent ethanol by 2010. Derived from agricultural crops, ethanol burns cleaner than gasoline, offers the same engine performance and can be used in blends of up to 10 per cent in all cars built since the 1970s. It's been around for years, but now the government is allocating more money for its development as an alternative fuel. Sounds great, no? But ethanol is not a panacea for our problems, environmentalists warn. Real greenhouse gas reductions depend on how the ethanol is produced. Plus, subsidies are still required to make it commercially viable. They say that government money would be much better spent supporting proven alternatives - such as public transportation. " On average, it takes a public transit user 40 years to consume the energy that a motorist consumes in four, " says Normand Parisien, executive director of Transport 2000. Questionable figures Ethanol fuel is not a new technology; in fact, ethanol blends have been available at a number of gas stations across Canada (and about five in Montreal) for years. In Canada, ethanol is traditionally made from the starch in wheat and corn. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), the federal agency overlooking our natural assets, estimates that using a 10 per cent ethanol blend in your car reduces greenhouse gas emissions by three per cent compared to conventional gasoline. But not everyone agrees with these figures. " The study by NRCan was severely criticized for overlooking certain elements of the energy chain required to produce ethanol, " explains Steven Guilbeault, director of Greenpeace Quebec and the climate change campaigner for Greenpeace Canada. Emerging technologies to produce cellulose-based ethanol are more promising. These would use agricultural residues such as cereal grain straw, corn stalks and cobs or even waste from the forestry sector. Supported by the Canadian government, the Ottawa-based Iogen Corporation has built a large-scale demonstration plant using this technology. NRCan estimates that 10 per cent blends using cellulose-based ethanol reduce greenhouse gas emissions by eight per cent. Yet it will be some time before this new technology is widespread. An ethanol plant slated for construction in Varennes, Quebec, would still use mostly corn. Moreover, until ethanol can hold its own over gas prices, government subsidies are required. A spokesperson for Les Pétroles Sonic, which sells ethanol blends at about 100 gas stations across Quebec, says they offer only a five per cent blend to keep it profitable. They're still waiting for the Quebec government to implement a promise to exempt the ethanol portion of gasoline blends from taxes. Expensive and untested " Ultimately, you want to be able to produce ethanol at a cost that's competitive with gasoline, on an unsubsidized basis, " says Bill Cruickshank, a bioenergy research and development specialist at the CANMET Energy Technology Centre in Ottawa. He says this is one objective of the NRCan program he manages supporting the research at Iogen. Alain Lefebvre, director of the hydrocarbons development branch of the Quebec Ministry of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Parks, is a member of the summit's organizing committee. He argues that in light of our Kyoto commitments, it's in Quebec's interest to develop ethanol fuel. " If we look at the technologies currently available that can be easily applied, ethanol fuel is a logical choice. I agree that the environmental gains are modest, but when you convert that into megatonnes, it's still substantial. " Others still disagree. They urge the government to invest in electric cars and public transit, and force car manufacturers to build cleaner-burning engines. " I think it's imprudent, if not misleading, to put a lot of money into ethanol as part of our Kyoto commitment plan, " says Guilbeault. " What if we realize, four or five years down the road, that we've invested hundreds of millions of dollars into a technology that doesn't deliver? " José Etcheverri, research and policy analyst for the David Suzuki Foundation's climate change program, qualifies ethanol as, at best, a remedial solution. " Too often, remedial actions tend to absorb resources to the detriment of preventive measures. " http://www.montrealmirror.com/ARCHIVES/2003/103003/news2.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.