Guest guest Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/29/us/29poultry.html?_r=1 http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2008/11/29/us/20081129POULTRY_4.html I have several objections to the article & slideshow, such as: 1) the article mentions 20-35 thousand birds cramped per house, without describing the horrific conditions. 2) the slide show is misleading by showing teensy 2 " chicks spread out vs grown birds with no room to move about. 3) the article praises chicken as affordable, high quality, low fat protein. it mentions, yet ignores, the higher quality, zero-cholesterol corn & soy crop, which could feed so many more people than birds, or be used for bio-fuel. 4) the article praises slaughterhouse job creation, without explaining why the industry needs irrradiation to address manure that cannot be purged in the fast assembly lines. 5) the article praises manure pellets as great organic fertilizer, without mentioning the great amounts of steroids and antibiotics fed to the crowded birds. _______________ Access your email online and on the go with Windows Live Hotmail. http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_access_1120\ 08 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.