Whales lose, Japan wins as whaling meet ends

[Guest guest]

http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSN2743745820080627?pageNumWhales lose, Japan wins as whaling meet endsFri Jun 27, 2008 3:39pm EDTBy Simon GardnerSANTIAGO (Reuters) - Whales emerged the big losers as a weeklong International Whaling Commission meeting wrapped up in Chile on Friday, conservation groups said after anti-whaling nations failed to halt No. 1hunter Japan.Anti-whale hunting nations led by Australia have voiced deep concern at Japan's skirting a nonbinding 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling by killing hundreds of whales each year in the name of scientific research.Japan says it is unhappy with the moratorium and wants to resume commercial whaling, though detractors say it is already doing so in all but name.The issue has generated so much tension that IWC Chairman Bill Hogarth, seeking to avoid confrontation, set up a working group to try to build consensus over the next year.But that step, with nations urged not to vote against each other on Japanese whaling or calls for a South Atlantic whale sanctuary, means little was achieved at the meeting, environmentalists said."I think it was a disappointing week for whales," said Ralf Sonntag ofthe International Fund for Animal Welfare."Japan goes home without any votes or resolutions against it. Iceland started a new round of commercial whaling just prior to this conference.So they are not taking it very seriously. Nothing has been achieved for the whales."Japan gives itself a special permit to catch 1,000 whales each year despite the moratorium, while Norway and Iceland continue to hunt whalesin defiance of the ban.Aboriginals in Greenland, Russia and Alaska are granted special concessions for subsistence hunting.NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN STATESJapan said it would not bow to pressure from the anti-whaling lobby and had not ruled out leaving the IWC altogether, but wanted to givedialogue a chance."Conservation groups might be disappointed at the meeting's outcome, butthe real negotiation has to take place between the states," said RyotaroSuzuki, senior coordinator of the ocean division of Japan's Foreign Ministry."I'm not telling you that we're going to stop the scientific research.All sorts of resolutions and talk about Japan-bashing in the past ... didn'tstop us," he added. "That's a reality, and conservation groups need to face that."Asked if Japan would ever consider halting whaling altogether, Suzuki said: "Yes and no.""We are not happy with the commercial whaling moratorium and we want theresumption of commercial whaling in a limited and sustainable way," he said.Australia, which strongly opposes whaling and has proposed reforms like joint nonlethal whale research with Japan and conservation management,put a brave face on the outcome."We would count it as having been in the main a constructive andpositive engagement," said Australian Environment Minister Peter Garrett."We're opposed to commercial whaling, we think the moratorium shouldstay in place and we're opposed to so-called scientific whaling in the way itis being conducted by Japan," he said."There are significant potential activities that countries can engage inin terms of cetacean research and whale use which doesn't require whalesto be killed," he added, referring to a burgeoning global whale-watchingindustry.Conservation groups said they were heartened that anti-whaling nations blocked Greenland's bid to raise its hunt quota by 10 humpback whalesthis year, amid claims some whale meat is being sold in Greenlandsupermarkets."The real risk of this week was that it would be business as usual atthe end of the meeting, and to a certain extent that is true," said Mick McIntyre, director of conservation group Whales Alive.(Editing by Xavier Briand) Thomson Reuters 2008. All rights reserved. Users may download andprint extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. ThomsonReuters and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to the Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.

This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is confidential. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the original message. You may not copy or disseminate this communication without the permission of the University. Only authorized signatories are competent to enter into agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus advised that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which are not necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in writing to the contrary.Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars.