Guest guest Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 I'm a digest r, and don't know what happened after my earlier post. Someone pointed out that mentioning the spam was okay, but it wasn't nice to be sarcastic about " modest dress, " etc. My apologies... spamming pushes a big button in me, and I shouldn't have mentioned anything but that. Certainly I believe people have a right to believe, spiritually, in whatever they want, and shouldn't be singled out as I did. Regards, Mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Mark, I don't think you owe anyone an apology. I thought you were quite mild. I consider spammers fair game. Barbara At 07:55 AM 6/14/05, you wrote: >I'm a digest r, and don't know what happened after my earlier post. > >Someone pointed out that mentioning the spam was okay, but it wasn't nice >to be sarcastic about " modest dress, " etc. > > >Regards, Mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 I agree - if you're putting all of that out there, it has to be expected to hear something. I actually found your email quite amusing --- Barbara & George Grenier <grenier wrote: > Mark, I don't think you owe anyone an apology. I > thought you were quite > mild. I consider spammers fair game. > > Barbara > > > At 07:55 AM 6/14/05, you wrote: > >I'm a digest r, and don't know what > happened after my earlier post. > > > >Someone pointed out that mentioning the spam was > okay, but it wasn't nice > >to be sarcastic about " modest dress, " etc. > > > > > >Regards, Mark > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 I don't agree that you need to apologize, Mark - although it's sweet of you to try to put things right. I also am grateful for you for pointing out the 'modest dressing' which I assume prefers lowfat over highfat and allows any pot, crock or otherwise, to reveal itself to our personal taste to best advantage. Best love, Pat the lurker > Someone pointed out that mentioning the spam was okay, but it wasn't nice > to be sarcastic about " modest dress, " etc. > > My apologies... spamming pushes a big button in me, and I shouldn't have > mentioned anything but that. Certainly I believe people have a right to > believe, spiritually, in whatever they want, and shouldn't be singled out > as I did. > > Regards, Mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 Except I don't think she was spamming. I think she was introducing herself by saying who she is and what she does for a living. Mark did not quote her spamming. He mentioned it and then flamed her being a conservative Christian and modest dresser. I think Mark did owe her an apology for that. Asking her not to spam (if indeed she realized that's what she was doing) would have been very appropriate. Attacking her for who she was was not. God's Peace, Gayle - Barbara & George Grenier Tuesday, June 14, 2005 12:01 PM Re: Apology Mark, I don't think you owe anyone an apology. I thought you were quite mild. I consider spammers fair game. Barbara At 07:55 AM 6/14/05, you wrote: >I'm a digest r, and don't know what happened after my earlier post. > >Someone pointed out that mentioning the spam was okay, but it wasn't nice >to be sarcastic about " modest dress, " etc. > > >Regards, Mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.