Guest guest Posted January 26, 2000 Report Share Posted January 26, 2000 January 11, 2000 Web posted at: 11:17 AM EST (1617 GMT) WASHINGTON (AP) -- For decades, the experience of dissecting a frog, fetal pig or earthworm was a rite of passage in high school biology class. Today, in more and more schools, technology is becoming an alternative to the smell of formaldehyde and the snap of surgical gloves. Some computer-savvy teen-angers apparently prefer to use a " virtual scalpel " -- a cursor on a computer -- to slice into an image of a frog rather than operate on a real amphibian. Some teachers consider computers just another way to get youngsters excited about science and allow students to practice what they have learned, whereas a dismembered frog cannot be stitched up again for a second dissection. " I really don't have any blanket objections to animal research, but I am not comfortable with a waste of life at this level. And if kids object, I am not going to force them, " said Deborah Hill, who teaches biology to sophomores and seniors at a high school in Norman, Oklahoma. " In a regular biology class, you do a dissection very hurriedly, and a lot of times, it's to satisfy morbid curiosity, " she said. " I don't know if they can fully appreciate the opportunity. It's a very tedious procedure to do it correctly. " Other teachers believe there is no substitute for the experience of an actual dissection, and the lesson, in addition to teaching biology, can foster respect for animals as complex organisms. " Virtual and plastic models are idealized, and real rats are not. For one thing, they have no texture, and there are no anomalies in models, " said Bob Brown, who teaches freshman biology at St. Francis High School in Louisville, Ky. " It's also important to see comparisons between various sizes and ages and genders all being examined by various students in the same classroom at the same time. " He sees one substantial advantage to the virtual, however -- no mess. The National Association of Biology Teachers in Reston, Va., agrees with teachers like Brown that dissection is a valuable classroom lesson. The association's position is that " no alternative can substitute for the actual experience of dissection or other use of animals and urges teachers to be aware of the limitations of alternatives. " At the same time, the association encourages teachers to be sensitive to students who object. The National Science Teachers Association in Arlington, Va., advises teachers that dissection objectives must be appropriate to the maturity level of the students and that students' views should be considered. Check it out... http://www.peta-online.org/cmp/crexpfs3.html http://george.lbl.gov/ITG.hm.pg.docs/dissect/info.html ps. Hi Stan! -- _____________ Free email services provided by http://www.goodkarmamail.com powered by OutBlaze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.