Guest guest Posted September 25, 2000 Report Share Posted September 25, 2000 Hi all; Regarding what is a " natural " diet for humans. I used to think that a raw food hygiene-style diet was natural, when I erroneously thought that primates ate a vegan diet in the wild. Now, I understand that they, our closest biological relative in nature, eat all raw, yes, but include animal products on an occassional but regular basis, as well as their own fecal matter. (Yuck, gross!) The animal products are their identifiable source of B12. That is what is natural for primates in nature and was natural for humans before the developments of technology made B12 available in supplement form. The thing is, humans are beginning to see the need to choose a vegan diet at this stage of our evolution, and fortunately, because of having evolved the technology to supply ourselves with the B12 we need in supplement form, we can do that. Eating animal products was essential at one stage of our human evolution, but that has changed, just like what is natural tends to change from one stage of life to the next. For example, what is natural for a human as a baby changes as the person ages. Not only do we now have the freedom to choose a vegan diet, clearly it is wise for us to make that change, just like it is best for the baby and it's mother, for children to be weaned from the mother's breast and onto a solid diet when they get bit enough. I think this is the case for human kind in general. I think that when we had no technology (and were in our infancy, as if were), we had to eat animal products to obtain the B12 we need. Now, in maybe our adolescence as a specie, we have technology to supply us far more efficiently with B12, which frees us to avail ourselves of the advantages of a plant food diet and save the various costs of animal products. I think we have outgrown the need to rely on animal products, although our need for B12 is the same as always, and I think that is natural. I think it is natural for us as a specie, and that it is necessary for the health and happiness of Our Mother Earth, for us to make that switch. Does that make sense do you think? Deborah Jeffrey Novick, MS, RD, Senior Nutritionist at the Pritikin Clinic in Florida, himself a raw foods vegan, informed me this morning that there are some studies of clinical blood values on vegans following natural hygiene diets, and that deficiencies have been reported for unsupplemented vegans, both on Natural Hygiene diets AND on the " Hallelujah Diet " . Have listmembers found any systematic data -- not opinions -- in this area? This would imply that, apart from the worldview predispositions towards following hygienic-style diets, the experiences of the followers of unsupplemented " Hallelujah Diet " diets and the natural hygiene style diets, as well as unsupplemented macrobiotic diets, have some significant biochemical and health parallels. I wonder if the suggestion of nutrition supplementation, and its significant as an " intervention " of some artificiality, alters the nature of the rationale or the justification for the diet. Maynard S. Clark Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - List owner: -owner Shortcut URL to this page: /community/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.