Guest guest Posted November 2, 2000 Report Share Posted November 2, 2000 Mad meat British beef may not be the sole culprit in this long, dark saga THE whole point of the BSE Inquiry was to learn from past mistakes. But can we be sure that a similar food and health disaster won't happen again? The simple answer is no. We know that BSE rampaged through British cattle, and we are now seeing the beginnings of an outbreak of vCJD in people. But we know so little about where else BSE might have spread that we simply can't say whether meat is safe. Mutton, lamb, pork and even chicken may harbour the infection. And we may be repeating those past mistakes that allowed BSE in cattle to spiral out of control. The problem is not confined to Britain. France and Portugal are just realising that they have far more BSE cases than they thought, and similar nasty surprises probably await other countries in Europe (see Graph). Cases of vCJD have already appeared outside Britain. We also do not know yet how vCJD might spread from one person to another--so it is possible that important measures to block such routes of transmission are not being taken. " In terms of what we know about the disease, we might be at the same stage in the vCJD epidemic now as we were with BSE in the early days, " says Moira Bruce of the Neuropathogenesis Unit in Edinburgh. What we do know is that pigs, chickens, sheep and even farmed fish have been exposed to BSE-contaminated feed. In many places in Europe, and possibly elsewhere, they still are. Britain banned the rendered remains of mammals from all animal feed in 1996. But elsewhere in Europe, where there are small but significant numbers of BSE-infected cattle, this material can legally be fed to non-ruminants. European Commission scientists believe some is still reaching ruminants as well. Moreover, some countries that could well harbour BSE-infected cattle will only start removing key infected tissues, such as brain and spinal cord, from animal or human food this year. But scientists recommended removing high-risk tissue from cattle in all EU countries in 1997, says Albert Osterhaus of the University of Rotterdam, a member of the European Commission's advisory panel on transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). It is also now clear that infections such as BSE affect different species in radically different ways. One species can be infected with a prion and not show any symptoms. But it can pass the infection to another species, which then falls sick. There has been, for example, no visible outbreak of TSEs, the group of diseases that include BSE, in pigs and chickens. Researchers working for Britain's Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food have failed to cause disease in pigs and chickens by giving them BSE-contaminated feed. This may mean such meat is safe. Crucially, however, no one has reported putting tissue from pigs or chickens that ate BSE-contaminated feed back into cows or other animals, to show if they are nonetheless infectious. Sheep are another matter. When they eat BSE-contaminated feed, they develop a disease clinically similar to the sheep disease scrapie. Mice fed meat from such sheep develop the distinctive pathology of BSE. So these sheep still have BSE, which, unlike scrapie, is a potential human pathogen. " What scares me is that BSE in sheep could infect humans, but look like scrapie, " says Osterhaus. Scrapie is common in much of Europe. We would not realise such sheep were dangerous, so people could be eating animals that are infected but not yet sick. This is " perhaps the most important unanswered question about the BSE epidemic " , says Liam Donaldson, Britain's current Chief Medical Officer. It has taken a while for researchers to realise the risk. They are now checking to see whether sheep with scrapie-like symptoms are actually harbouring BSE. Ominously, Spain--which had always been free of scrapie--has just declared its first scrapie cases. Spain denies having BSE, but the European Commission is sceptical. " The money used for the BSE Inquiry would have been better spent on eradicating scrapie, " says Paul Brown of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders near Washington DC. " The inquiry won't teach us how to avoid the same thing happening again. " British agriculture minister Nick Brown says Britain plans to eradicate scrapie just in case it is masking the presence of BSE. Another problem with sheep is the distribution of infection in their bodies. In cattle, BSE is only known to infect brain and nerve tissues and some parts of the gut, says Bruce. But in sheep with BSE, as in scrapie, infection is spread through the body, and is more likely to be in the meat we eat. This means that unlike BSE in cattle, BSE in sheep might well spread from sheep to sheep when they nibble afterbirths or dead sheep. Controlling feed will not block infection in this case. " We urgently need to understand how these infections get out of sheep, " says epidemiologist Mark Woolhouse of the University of Edinburgh. Although progress has been slow, the one area where we seem to have learned the lesson of the BSE debacle is research. This time, say scientists, research efforts are open, and broad-based, and the threat to public health is concentrating minds on the key risk areas. Yet government reluctance, especially in continental Europe, to admit the scale or implications of the BSE epidemic still hampers progress. The German government continues to promote German meat as safe--just like Britain did--though few experts believe Germany is free of BSE. EU countries are only now preparing to test cattle not obviously suffering from BSE for the prion. This has already revealed many unsuspected cases in France and Switzerland. But Markus Moser of the Swiss company Prionics, which makes one of the leading tests, says some countries have not yet published their plans to test cattle. We have also been slow to realise that TSEs may spread from person to person, for example, in blood products. " Evidence so far suggests that the distribution of prion in humans may be more like sheep than cattle, " says Bruce. Unlike cattle, it seems that BSE in infected sheep can pass into other sheep through blood. If humans are similar, transfusions might pose a risk. Yet in a recent statement eerily similar to the British government's early declarations that beef is safe for humans, Britain's National Blood Service says: " There is no direct evidence of blood transmission of vCJD in humans. " However, this time someone--Paul Brown--is testing blood transmission of vCJD in primates to make sure. So once again, we may be allowing a BSE-like disease to spread. This time, far more scientists are interested and far more people are watching for the unexpected pathways BSE might have taken. We can only hope that this time, they get it right before it's too late. Debora MacKenzie From New Scientist magazine, 04 November 2000. http://www.newscientist.com/nlf/1104/mad.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.