Guest guest Posted January 22, 2001 Report Share Posted January 22, 2001 The following was published in the High Country News. Trappers often argue that leghold traps are " humane " because they use them to trap endangered animals for relocation to new areas where people are working to reestablish populations. After all, who would want a mutilated animal to begin a reintroduction project they argue. But as this article shows, wolves suffer horribly in traps. Otters have also been trapped for reintroduction projects. When otters were trapped to be relocated into Indiana, 53% of the otters had to receive veterinary attention because of lacerations and amputations of toes caused by leghold traps. These cruel devices must be banned. http://www.hcn.org/wotr/dir/WOTR_001107_Robinson.html 'Protected' wolves still caught in a trap= by Michael Robinson TALK BACK - Discussion Forum Many people justly celebrate the reintroduction of wolves as a reversal of the federal wolf extermination policy of most of the last century. But look below the surface, and the policy may have changed a little less than it appears. In particular, a three-legged Mexican gray wolf roaming New Mexico's Gila National Forest indicates how, in some respects, the Old West still reigns. She's called F189, but her progenitors in the same predicament several wolf generations ago, from the 1880s to the 1940s, were given names at once both visceral and pedestrian: Two Toes, Three Toes, Old Lefty. These and dozens of others all came to their titular disfigurations in the same manner: Working to free themselves from leghold traps placed by the U.S. Bureau of Biological Survey. Old Lefty of northwestern Colorado had twisted and torn the tendons in his trapped limb until only loose skin kept his useless foreleg in the trap. He bit through the skin and hopped away alive and forever wary -- but finally tricked into another, final trap by a federal agent who used his fear of traveling on established trails against him. Back then, in 1921, though the goal was extinction, the individual wolves took on mythical hews and some of the killers themselves waxed nostalgic as their work petered out with the last few " renegades. " Government publicists used the wolves' sobriquets to foster popular interest in the extermination campaign. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is a direct institutional descendent of the old Bureau of Biological Survey. Ironically, now dedicated to wolf recovery, the agency eschews naming wolves -- even as breeders and docents in some of the zoos that participate in the Mexican wolf captive breeding program assign their charges monikers: Rio, Francisco, Sheila, Paquito, Zuni. Instead, the government gives each animal an identifying number. The reason can be inferred from the fact that aside from putting the animals on the ground in the first place, the Fish and Wildlife Service has prioritized livestock interests over wolves in the face of any conflict. And such a policy, taken to an extreme in order to mollify still-furious ranchers, has brought us full circle to the three-legged wolves of yore. F189 was released in spring 1999 in the Blue Range of Arizona, accompanied by a male wolf and their four newborn pups. The pack roamed ponderosa and juniper forests preying on deer and elk. Two other packs, meanwhile, tempted into preying on stock by cattle carcasses on which they had scavenged, had been trapped and removed from the wild -- to the accompaniment of venomous rhetoric by the livestock industry. In the course of removing those other packs in the fall, F189 was accidentally trapped, and lost two toes on her left front leg. Fish and Wildlife Service was desperate for Mexican wolf " success " stories, and the Mule Pack still seemed a good prospect. Hence, four months later, when the pack discovered a cow and a horse carcass on the national forest,and scavenged on them, the federal agency decided to move the wolves to an area without stock. But this time their trapping went even more awry, and F189 was left overnight in cold January weather to struggle against the trap. When the government trapper found her, she had suffered frostbite and her leg had to be amputated. Today, she roams the Gila National Forest of New Mexico alone. Though her pack was released with her, a previously cohesive social unit broke apart: Her mate took off running, along with her two surviving yearling sons; the latter are back in captivity, and her mate has recently joined with two other wolves from a pack that was similarly fragmented due to equally aggressive management. F189 displays the same perseverance and will to live as her injured kin from decades past. She has avoided domestic animals and despite missing a leg has survived by bringing down wild prey. And unlike in the early 1900s, the government favors her survival, having provided veterinary care after her accidental injury and re-releasing her when she recovered. But the eerie similarities to past three-legged wolves can't help but remind us that managing wolves with leghold traps will always be risky, and that the perceived need to trap and remove wolves -- in this case before any cattle were bothered -- will inevitably involve accidents. The underlying logic of wolf extermination still holds true: Livestock will graze the public lands and anything that interferes will be removed. As long as that notion holds sway, expect more injured wolves. But don't be surprised if the agency that once trumpeted the myth of such wolves as outlaws, assigning them characters and fame, now relegates them digits like " 189 " -- an ironically antiseptic substitute for the very real digits lost to the snap of a trap. Michael Robinson is a contributor to Writers on the Range, a service of High Country News (www.hcn.org). He is a longtime wolf advocate and lives in Pinos Altos, New Mexico. Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.