Guest guest Posted October 16, 2002 Report Share Posted October 16, 2002 I have to face this a lot too. I`ve not been following whatever this is about, but I get kicked off lists for being " off-topic " all the time. People are trained to sadly see things as all chopped up into neat different sections, but life isn`t like that. Veganism needs to be holistic, just as everything needs to be (socialism, or whatever) holistic, if it is to be valid in a universe in which all things are interconnected and related. As Aristotle said, " Man is a political animal " . Your choice to buy Quorn instead of meat and soya instead of milk is a political act. Life cannot be treated as a collection of neatly divided packages like in a supermarket. Veganism, too, is richly intertwined with everything else: our life-view, our values, our sensitivity, our POLITICS! Just as hunting is a political issue and war is a political issue, so is veganism. So, if folk want to be off-topic, let them! It must be the ones doing the censoring who have the problem here, not the contributors! As Locke said, " Let`s throw in all our ideas for the debate. We`ll sort them out as we go along. " - Josey Sunday, October 27, 2002 8:04 AM Re: spoils of peace -- was: spoils of war wow, that was insanely insensitive... is it not enough to dismiss an emotional and obviously heart-felt post as off topic, you have to add insult to injury by passing it off flippantly as " stuff about Israel " ? way to be " compassionate " ! Considering that apparently vegan subjects are running dry (this is the first post since my rant yesterday) would you rather accept ideas that may be of interest to other humans w/ consciences, or talk about nothing until someone comes up with another vegan topic? I hate to be the one always making a stink, but have some decency. It is obvious that this is something that is personally important to Debbie and close to her heart. how would you like it if someone paraphrased your post in another group as " [a lot of deleted stuff about Veganism] " and told you it was off topic? Maybe I'm overreacting but this seems just plain mean and insensitive! Josey , Gerry Morgan <gjm@p...> wrote: > Debbie wrote: > [a lot of deleted stuff about Israel] > > As Anji recently pointed out, this is a list about veganism. Let's remain > focused on the main topic of the list, interesting as international > politics may be. > > Gerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2002 Report Share Posted October 27, 2002 B " H I realize that the people on this list are trying to be as compassionate as they can be, and I realize that with the anti-Israel and anti-Jewish sentiment that is contaminating this earth and this country it is very difficult to know what is right and what is wrong, but I find it very disheartening (and quite a bit scary from a " person who was named after someone who died in the holocaust " perspective) that Jewish life is so cheap. It seems so easy for people to dismiss the murders that go on day after day in Israel, a country about the size of NJ. Babies, young people (teenagers, young marrieds, young couples), grandparents, families as a whole, schoolchildren, etc. are targeted with no concern for who they are or what sort of person they might be. We as Jews are fighting for our survival -- not just the survival of our faith (which, for people who are compassionate, if you only understood what our Torah and our beliefs stand for, you'd realize we are basically the most peaceful of people, but we do believe in protecting ourselves and our families and our babies) but the survival of our people. It's funny (that's ironic) that we are being accused consistently of doing exactly what the accusers are doing to us (which, I might add, we are NOT doing). Jews and the government of Israel protects the religious places and icons and holy places of other faiths, including Islam (and Christianity). Members of the PA (Palestinian Authority) are not militants. Militants take over the offices of college presidents. They are terrorists. They kill for no reason (Israel has offered on several occasions to give them what they SAY they want. What they REALLY want is for us to be dead. Period.) It freaks the heck out of me that people equate pacifism with what I consider suicide. I am a pacifist. I don't believe in war. UNLESS (and this is a huge unless) people begin a war with you and the only way to stop them is to fight BACK. This is what Israel was trying to do (though horribly inadequately due to world, particularly US, pressures). So, please. Look at a map. Look and see how big Israel is (or, should I say how small Israel is?) when compared to the Arab countries that surround them. The Palestinians are refuges denied admission to these countries for the sole purpose of destroying Israel and killing the Jews. If you doubt this, please, explain to me why the Arabs only began to " care " about them when Israel, after winning a war that was thrust upon them in 1967 (like the previous wars of 1948 and 1956 and other future military actions), took these lands. When they were under Jordanian control, no one cared about them. Debbie not to beat a dead horse or anything, so to speak (i say that a lot, and it always feels weird saying it to other vegans), but i see posts about police brutality, chicano youths/palestine, etc. I think these, and anti-war subjects are likely to be relevant to vegans, depending on what each individual's reasons for being vegan are. If it is a matter of health, then maybe it wouldn't be so relevant, but it seems more common that it is a matter of compassion. If we show compassion towards animals, and espouse non-violence by way of our lifestyle, it seems it would follow that we would show compassion for our fellow humans as well, after all, humans are animals, and animal issues, i think, should also encompass human issues (but not eclipse them). I have an " animal liberation/human liberation " button that I wear,which is basically a visual protrayal of my point here. I think that animal rights and human rights are very closely related (as closely as we are to our animal brethren, for that matter)and to focus exclusively on either without the other is missing something. There's also the argument of veganism/vegetarianism making the world a better place for all beings, by reducing the use of fossil fuels (there's a tie to war in the middle-east right there), reducing the amount of land used to grow food for livestock and growing it for humans instead, alleviating this hunger problem we have, these are " human issues " that are intimately tied to our movement. This is just my take on it, I wont speak for anyone else. I like the slogan " non-violence begins at dinner " , i think it complements this post well. Veganism, for many, is an expression of non-violence, of going the extra mile to alleviate suffering. War is the antithesis of this ideal. War is suffering. I do understand not wanting to get too off-topic, and i also understand the moderator's feelings take precedence in their own group (and grudgingly accept this fact, against my anarchist sensibilities), so with your say so, I will refrain from " off-topic " posts in the future, if you still deem anti- war posts to be so, but I personally think the mass slaughter of innocent humans is more akin to the mass slaughter of innocent animals than most people want to think about, which is not to downplay the importance of either group (i hope that's obvious). Also, I'm sorry to the mod if I come on too strong on this point or sound rude, I get loud when I'm passionate about something :-P, and I would like to thank you for being polite in your reminder. I think we're all good people in this group, even if we don't always agree with each other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2002 Report Share Posted October 27, 2002 Debbie wrote: [a lot of deleted stuff about Israel] As Anji recently pointed out, this is a list about veganism. Let's remain focused on the main topic of the list, interesting as international politics may be. Gerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2002 Report Share Posted October 27, 2002 wow, that was insanely insensitive... is it not enough to dismiss an emotional and obviously heart-felt post as off topic, you have to add insult to injury by passing it off flippantly as " stuff about Israel " ? way to be " compassionate " ! Considering that apparently vegan subjects are running dry (this is the first post since my rant yesterday) would you rather accept ideas that may be of interest to other humans w/ consciences, or talk about nothing until someone comes up with another vegan topic? I hate to be the one always making a stink, but have some decency. It is obvious that this is something that is personally important to Debbie and close to her heart. how would you like it if someone paraphrased your post in another group as " [a lot of deleted stuff about Veganism] " and told you it was off topic? Maybe I'm overreacting but this seems just plain mean and insensitive! Josey , Gerry Morgan <gjm@p...> wrote: > Debbie wrote: > [a lot of deleted stuff about Israel] > > As Anji recently pointed out, this is a list about veganism. Let's remain > focused on the main topic of the list, interesting as international > politics may be. > > Gerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2002 Report Share Posted October 27, 2002 Josey wrote: >how would you like it if someone paraphrased your post in >another group as " [a lot of deleted stuff about Veganism] " and told >you it was off topic? I don't make off-topic posts in other groups (nor in this one). But if I made one, and someone paraphrased my post in that way, I'd consider it to be an entirely appropriate response. Josey also wrote: >Maybe I'm overreacting but this seems just plain mean and insensitive! It's neither. The point of a mailing list is to have a discussion about a particular subject. Ours is veganism. So let's stick to the topic. Anthony Walker wrote: >Life cannot be treated as a collection of neatly divided packages like in >a supermarket. >Veganism, too, is richly intertwined with everything else: our life-view, >our values, our sensitivity, our POLITICS! You are right that life can't be compartmentalized. But this mailing list has a focus, and that is veganism. There are other mailing lists for talking about middle eastern politics. It's true that there may sometimes be wider issues that are relevant, but it's the poster's responsibility to make it clear why those issues are not off-topic in this list. In the case of this thread, there was no clear link to veganism. That's why it was off-topic. Gerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2002 Report Share Posted October 27, 2002 I guess this is where I decide to be mature and bow out, rather than get mean. Okay, let the vegan discussions commence. , Gerry Morgan <gjm@p...> wrote: > Josey wrote: > >how would you like it if someone paraphrased your post in > >another group as " [a lot of deleted stuff about Veganism] " and told > >you it was off topic? > > I don't make off-topic posts in other groups (nor in this one). But if I > made one, and someone paraphrased my post in that way, I'd consider it to > be an entirely appropriate response. > > Josey also wrote: > >Maybe I'm overreacting but this seems just plain mean and insensitive! > > It's neither. The point of a mailing list is to have a discussion about a > particular subject. Ours is veganism. So let's stick to the topic. > > Anthony Walker wrote: > >Life cannot be treated as a collection of neatly divided packages like in > >a supermarket. > >Veganism, too, is richly intertwined with everything else: our life-view, > >our values, our sensitivity, our POLITICS! > > You are right that life can't be compartmentalized. But this mailing list > has a focus, and that is veganism. There are other mailing lists for > talking about middle eastern politics. It's true that there may sometimes > be wider issues that are relevant, but it's the poster's responsibility to > make it clear why those issues are not off-topic in this list. In the case > of this thread, there was no clear link to veganism. That's why it was > off-topic. > > Gerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.