What Al Gore Didn't Mention in 'Inconvenient Truth'

[Guest guest]

[What Al Gore Didn't Mention in 'Inconvenient Truth'. Rick.]

 

 

 

 

A Very Inconvenient Truth

 

Commentary by Captain Paul Watson

 

The meat industry is one of the most destructive ecological industries

on the planet. The raising and slaughtering of pigs, cows, sheep,

turkeys and chickens not only utilizes vast areas of land and vast

quantities of water, but it is a greater contributor to greenhouse gas emissions

than the automobile industry.

 

The seafood industry is literally plundering the ocean of life and some

fifty percent of fish caught from the oceans is fed to cows, pigs,

sheep, chickens etc in the form of fish meal. It also takes about fifty

fish caught from the sea to raise one farm raised salmon.

 

We have turned the domestic cow into the largest marine predator on the

planet. The hundreds of millions of cows grazing the land and farting

methane consume more tonnage of fish than all the world's sharks,

dolphins and seals combined. Domestic housecats consume more fish,

especially tuna, than all the world's seals.

 

So why is it that all the world's large environmental and

conservation groups are not campaigning against the meat industry? Why did Al

Gore's film Inconvenient Truth not mention the inconvenient truth that

the slaughter industry creates more greenhouse gases than the automobile

industry?

 

The Greenpeace ships serve meat and fish to their crews everyday. The

World Wildlife Fund does not say a word about the threat that meat

eating poses for the survival of wildlife, the habitat destroyed, the wild

competitors for land eliminated, or the predators destroyed to save

their precious livestock. .

 

When I was a Sierra Club director for three years, everyone looked

amused when I brought up the issue of vegetarianism. At each of our Board

meeting dinners, the Directors were served meat and only after much

prodding and complaining did the couple of vegetarian directors manage to

get a vegetarian option. At our meeting in Montana we were served

Buffalo and antelope, lobsters in Boston, crabs in Charleston, steak in

Albuquerque etc. But what else can we expect from a “conservation†group

that endorses trophy hunting.

 

As far as I know and I may be wrong, but my organization, the Sea

Shepherd Conservation Society is the only conservation organization in the

world that endorses and practises vegetarianism. My ships do not serve

meat or fish ever, nor do we serve dairy products. We've had a

strictly vegan menu for years and no one has died of scurvy or malnutrition.

 

The price we pay for this is to be accused by other conservation

organizations of being animal rights. Like it's a bad word. They say

it with the same disdain that Americans used to utter the word

communist in the Fifties.

 

The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is not an animal rights

organization. We are exclusively involved in interventions against illegal

activities that threaten and exploit marine wildlife and habitat. We are

involved in ocean wildlife conservation activities.

 

Yet because we operate our ships as vegan vessels, other groups, and

now the media dismiss us as an animal rights organization.

 

Now first of all I don't see being accused of as an animal rights

organization to be an insult. PETA was co-founded by one of my

crew-members and many of my volunteers come from the animal rights movement. But

it is not accurate to refer to Sea Shepherd as animal rights when our

organization pushes a strict conservation enforcement policy.

 

And secondly we do not promote veganism on our ships because of animal

rights. We promote veganism as a means of practising what we preach

which is ocean conservation.

 

There is not enough fish in the world's oceans to feed 6.6 billion

human beings and another 10 billion domestic animals. That is why all the

world's commercial fisheries are collapsing. That is why whales,

seals, dolphins and seabirds are starving. The sand eel for example, the

primary source of food for the comical and beautiful puffin is being

wiped out by Danish fishermen solely to provide fish meal to Danish factory

farmed chickens.

 

This is a solid conservation connection between eating meat and the

destruction of life in our oceans.

 

In a world fast losing resources of fresh water, it is sheer lunacy to

have hundreds of millions of cows consuming over 1,000 gallons of water

for every pound of beef produced.

 

And the pig farms in North Carolina produce so much waste that it has

contaminated the entire ground water reserves of the entire state. North

Carolinians drink pig shit with their water but its okay they say, they

just neutralize it with chemicals like chlorine.

 

Most people don't want to see where their meat comes from. They also

don't want to know what the impact of their meat has on the ecology.

They would rather just deny the whole thing and pretend that meat is

something that comes in packages from the store.

 

But because there is this underlying guilt always present, it manifests

itself as anger and ridicule towards people who live the most

environmentally positive life styles on the planet – the vegans and the

vegetarians.

 

This is demonstrated through constant marginalization especially in the

media. Any organization, like Sea Shepherd for example, that points out

the ecological contradictions of eating meat is immediately dismissed

as some wacko animal rights organization.

 

I did not set the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society up as an animal

rights organization and we have never promoted animal rights in the

organization. What we have promoted and what we do is oceanic wildlife and

habitat conservation work.

 

And the truth is that you can't practise solid and constructive

conservation work without promoting veganism and/or vegetarianism as

something that promotes the conservation of resources.

 

A few years ago I attended a dinner meeting of the American Oceans

Campaign hosted by Ted Danson. He opened the dinner by saying that the

choice he had to make was between fish and chicken for the dinner, and what

was the point of saving fish if you can't eat them?

 

Guest speaker, Oceanographer Sylvia Earle put Ted in his place by

saying she did not think that he was being very funny. She said that she

considered fish to be her friends and she did not believe in eating her

friends. So neither Sylvia nor I ate dinner that night.

 

I met Sylvia again at another meeting, this time of Conservation

International held at some ritzy resort in the Dominican Republic. Harrison

Ford was there and the buzz was what could be done to save the oceans. I

was invited as an advisor. I sat on a barstool in an open beachfront

dining plaza as the conservationists approached tables literally

bending from the weight of fish and exotic seafood including caviar. I

looked at Sylvia Earle and she just shook her head and rolled her eyes.

 

The problem is that people like Carl Pope, the Executive Director of

the Sierra Club, or the heads of Greenpeace, World Wildlife Fund,

Conservation International and many other big groups just refuse to accept

that their eating habits may be just as much a part of the problem as all

those things they are trying to oppose.

 

I remember one Greenpeacer defending his meat eating by saying that he

was a carnivore and that predators have their place and he was

proud to be one.

 

Now the word predator in relationship to human beings has a rather

scary connotation having nothing to do with eating habits, but for any

human being to describe themselves as a carnivore is just plain ridiculous.

 

Humans are not and have never been carnivores. A lion is a carnivore as

is a wolf, as is a tiger, or a shark. Carnivores eat live animals. They

stalk them, they run them down, they pounce, they kill, and they eat,

blood dripping, meat at body temperature. Nature, brutal red in tooth

and claw.

 

I've never met a human that can do that. Yes we found ways to run

down animals and kill them. In fact we've come to be rather efficient at

the killing part. But we can't eat the prey until we cut it up and

cook it and that usually involves some time between kill and eating. It

could be an hour or it could be years.

 

You see our meat eating habits are more closely related to the vulture,

the jackal or other carrion eaters. This means that we can't be

described as carnivores. We are better described as necrovores or eaters of

rotting flesh.

 

Consider that some of the beef that people eat has been dead for months

and in some cases for years. Dead and hanging in freezers, full of

uritic acid and bacteria. It's a corpse in a state of decomposition. Not

much that can be said to be noble about eating a cadaver.

 

But a little dose of denial allows us to bite into that Big Mac or cut

into that prime rib.

 

But that one 16 ounce cut of prime rib is equal to a thousand gallons

of fresh water, a few acres of grass, a few fish, a quarter acre of corn

etc. What's the point of taking a shorter shower to conserve water as

Greenpeace is preaching if you can sit down and consume a 1000 gallons

of water at a single meal?

 

And that single cut of meat would have cost as much in vegetable

resources equivalent to what could be fed to an entire African village for a

week.

 

The problem is that we choose to see our contradictions when it is

convenient for us to see them and when it is not we simply go into a state

of suspended disbelief and we eat that steak anyway because, hey we

like the taste of rotting flesh in the evening.

 

Have you ever thought why it is that with a person, it’s an abortion

but when it comes to a chicken, it's an omelette?

 

Does anyone really know what's in a hot dog? We do know that the

government health department allows for an acceptable percentage of bug

parts, rodent droppings and other assorted filth to go into the mix.

 

And now tuna fish comes with a health warming saying it should not be

eaten by pregnant women or small children because of high levels of

mercury. Does that mean mercury is good for adults and non-pregnant women?

What are they telling us here?

 

Eating meat and fish is not only bad for the environment it's also

unhealthy. Yet even when it comes to our own health we slip into denial

mode and order the whopper.

 

The bottom line is that to be a conservationist and an

environmentalist, you must practise and promote vegetarianism or better yet

veganism.

 

It is the lifestyle that leaves the shallowest ecological footprint,

uses fewer resources and produces less greenhouse gas emissions, it's

healthier and it means you're not a hypocrite.

 

In fact a vegan driving a hummer would be contributing less greenhouse

gas carbon emissions than a meat eater riding a bicycle.

 

May be freely distributed, reproduced and published with permission of

the writer.

 

Paulwatson

 

Captain Paul Watson

Founder and President of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (1977-

Co-Founder - The Greenpeace Foundation (1972)

Co-Founder - Greenpeace International (1979) of the Sierra Club USA (2003-2006) - The Farley Mowat Institute - www.harpseals.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell?

Check outnew cars at Autos.