Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

The Meat Eating Environmentalist - a Contradiction in Terms?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

The Meat Eating Environmentalist - a Contradiction in Terms?

 

For more informations: www.goveg.com

 

 

World Environment Day - 5 June 2007

Press Release - European Vegetarian Union

 

It takes no more than a moment's thought to realise that in terms of land, water

and energy it is far more efficient to live on plant foods than on the dead

bodies of animals who themselves had to eat huge quantities of plants to fuel

their own growth and activity.

Studies of the health of vegans (no animal products), other vegetarians (milk

and eggs only) and meat eaters have also shown beyond doubt that human beings,

including children, can be perfectly healthy without animal products.

 

What is new is the growing recognition that we are pressing the environmental

limits of our planet, and the widespread acceptance by authoritative

international bodies that a key reason for this is our continuing - on a world

scale, still growing - reliance on animals for food.

 

Global warming is increasingly accepted as the critical challenge for the 21st

century and the recent report by the United Nations Food and Agriculture

Organisation (FAO), " Livestock's Long Shadow " , removes any doubt as to the

importance of our food choices to addressing this issue:

 

- " The livestock sector emerges as one of the top two or three most significant

contributors to the most serious environmental problems at every scale from

local to global. "

 

- " The livestock sector ... is responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse gas

emissions measured in CO2 equivalent. This is a higher share than transport. "

 

- Demand for meat and for livestock feed is driving the destruction of forests

with accompanying massive release of carbon dioxide. The methane from ruminant

animals is the other major livestock impact on greenhouse gases.

 

Despite the dramatic evidence of the need for change, most organisations remain

convinced that livestock will always be with us. While recognising the damaging

impact of livestock on the environment, the FAO expects world consumption of

milk and meat to double by 2050. They have seen the problem, and the solution

is staring them in the face, yet it seems that the world's leaders just cannot

imagine a future without continued dependence on animal products.

 

However, if we can't both imagine such a future AND take urgent steps to make it

a reality we shan't have a future at all. If we make the leap quickly enough we

may yet have the luxury of looking back on the blindness of past generations

from the standpoint of the only viable future - where a meat-eating

environmentalist will seem as absurd a concept as an egalitarian slave owner.

 

Renato Pichler

President

European Vegetarian Union

www.euroveg.eu

president

 

 

http://www.euroveg.eu/lang/en/news/press/20070605.php

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...